Smart SpendingSmart Spending

Should we all pay more taxes?

Would it be wrong to expect the middle class to pay higher taxes to help reduce the federal debt?

By Karen Datko Jan 8, 2013 4:22PM

Image: Taxes (© Thinkstock/SuperStock)If I had a dollar for each time I've heard someone say that we're burdening our kids and grandkids with a huge federal debt -- Rick Santelli's recent rant about "all kids left behind" should count for a lot -- I'd happily give that money to the U.S. Treasury.

 

I'd be in good company. Last year righteous Americans donated a record $7.7 million -- over and above their tax bills -- to cut the nation's debt, CNN says

 

It could use some help. With the federal debt at $16.4 trillion, the Congress has racked up a big stack of IOUs, which means we all owe this. You may disagree about how essential it is to reduce this large amount immediately, but we can all agree that the interest on the debt -- $220 billion in 2012, says U.S. News & World Report -- could be better spent elsewhere.

 

For whatever reason -- lack of political will is at or near the top of the list -- the president and Congress decided as part of the so-called fiscal cliff pact to raise income and investment taxes only on those making more than $400,000. (I'm not counting the 2% increase for payroll taxes for Social Security, which nearly every worker will pay. It was generally understood that the payroll tax holiday was a temporary stimulus measure that would end.)

 

Now President Barack Obama is talking about closing tax loopholes that favor the wealthy, as the next phony crisis -- votes on raising the debt ceiling and automatic and drastic spending cuts put off by the fiscal cliff deal -- approaches. Others believe the solution should be drastically shrinking the size of government.

 

Now, if you read personal finance blogs, you know that reduced spending is only part of the solution for restoring fiscal sanity in a household overwhelmed by debt. The other half is raising revenue. And that's where all the rest of us come in. Wouldn't a modest tax increase on the middle class -- not just the wealthy -- help the country? Surely more households could be taxed a little more without triggering another recession.

 

The idea surfaces from time to time but is hardly heard above the din of so many complaining about their tax burden.

 

"But in fact, most Americans in 2010 paid far less in total taxes -- federal, state and local -- than they would have paid 30 years ago," reported The New York Times in late November. "According to an analysis by (the Times), the combination of all income taxes, sales taxes and property taxes took a smaller share of their income than it took from households with the same inflation-adjusted income in 1980."

Since 1980, state and local taxes increased while federal income tax rates declined. If it doesn't feel that way to some old-timers, there's a reason. Adds The Times, "The average American in 2010 paid 30% more of income in payroll taxes (for Social Security and Medicare) than in 1980, even while paying 27% less in federal income taxes."

 

The Times says that those making more than $200,000 a year were the biggest beneficiaries of federal tax cuts over the years. But others with lower incomes also gained, so isn't it fair that more of us should pony up now?

 

Among those who agree are:

  • New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who suggested in 2011 that the Bush tax cuts be allowed to expire across the board.
  • Former U.S. Senator (and NBA star) Bill Bradley, who said last summer on CNN, "The deficit is one problem (we face) -- and that requires taxes on a lot of people, not just the wealthy."
  • Wrote David Callahan, a senior fellow at Demos, at the end of November:

"Only 13% of voters earlier this month agreed that income taxes should go up for everyone, according to exit polls. And only 33% agreed that taxes should be raised to help tackle the deficit.

 

"Now, it would be one thing if all these Americans against higher taxes also wanted to see spending cuts. But, of course, that is not the case."

He proposed that all the Bush tax cuts be allowed to lapse on Dec. 31. Then Congress could vote to extend them for other than the rich only long enough to get through the economic recovery.

 

If the Bush tax cuts had been allowed to expire for everyone, that would have raised federal revenue by $4 trillion over 10 years. The last federal budget was $3.7 trillion, with a deficit of $1.1 trillion. Letting the Bush tax cuts die would have helped fill the gap that's now being paid for with borrowed money.

 

What do you think? Should middle-class taxpayers share more of the tax burden -- now or in the future, once the economy is more robust? Why shouldn't they be asked to pay a little more? I'm reminded of a comment I once read about how paying taxes used to be considered a duty, a responsibility -- a privilege, in fact.

 

More on MSN Money:

519Comments
Jan 17, 2013 3:25AM
avatar

I agree with most of the folks here..., the problem is not with the taxpayers, it's with the politicians trying to use tax dollars to buy votes.  Here's my idea.  Anyone recieving an "unearned" payment from the Federal Government loses their right to vote do to conflict of interest.  Wouldn't involve Federal paychecks, or returns for things we've paid into our entire working lives like social security or medicare, just the "freebies" we simply can no longer afford to give away.  My guess is that as soon as the politicians find out they can't buy anyone's vote, they'll stop giving away the money.

 

A second notion that occurs to me is to stop paying Congressional salaries and perks when they spend more than they take in.  Just a drop in the deficit bucket..., but at least it puts more of the pain on the people who caused the problem.   

Jan 17, 2013 3:23AM
avatar
Are you kidding? We have a federal government that can not control it's spending and you expect the middle class to give even more. The Republicans and the Democrats need to reign in their spending.
Vote out all incumbents and bring in a change of the guard. If they then do their jobs they get to keep their jobs.

Jan 17, 2013 3:15AM
avatar

I can tell you why no one in the middle class, or upper class, or in the lower class of working folks, should have to pay even a dime more in taxes - because it is way past due that something else happens. The time is right for an alternative to higher taxes. You know what time is due, the time for - the unrighteous entitlists, those leeches on unemployment for up to a year when yes there are jobs but just not the ones they want out there, the drug dealers who get public assistance and food stamps, the fakers on disability who are more able than you or I, the bums who could work but choose to suck charity's tit dry, the Occupy Wallstreet useless hippies who rant and rave and never earn anything but the disrespect due them - those useless pieces of flotsam in our society to get off of their supposedly entitled arses and get legitimate jobs and pay taxes. It is time for the 47 percent who pay nothing but who take everything to finally get jobs waiting tables, washing dishes, scrubbing floors, cleaning up dog poo in kennels, digging ditches, handing out fliers, or doing whatever menial jobs they can get to pay their fair share and to lighten the burden on the rest of us by not taking what we have dutifully earned. It is also time to get rid of the 30 million blood sucking illegal aliens in this country and for them to give up their jobs to the above mentioned useless American citizens so that tax rates on the rest of us can finally go down. Think about it, then sleep on it, and maybe you will wake up as a responsible adult tomorrow.  Something tells me though, you are a hopeless liberal, just as hopeless as is the future of any country, like the USA, in which so many feel entitled, even empowered, to take so much from the rest of us and give nothing in return except demands for more. 

Sincerely,

Glenn  B

Jan 17, 2013 2:59AM
avatar
Why should I pay more money for someone else's screw up? I would much rather give that dollar to a local business than the government, which will squander it and get a few cents worth of stuff out of it. It's not my fault the govt overspent, so why should I hand over more cash? How about they spend less like the rest of us?
avatar

Does anybody know if the White House sees these comments? Or, are we just throwing words out into the air with no results. Every comment I see is fairly accurate. Third world countries get money from the U.S. that we don't know about. They'll never support us, just burn the flag. Washington politicians have no plans to stop the "Debt Clock" as it goes out of control and I think we know that. Each so called President just increases the debt ceiling. Do we all know who we really owe? Some say China. Our debt is over 16.5 trillion and we owe China  less than Japan...about 1.2 trillion. Take a look when you can at who we owe money to. You'll find we owe ourselves most of the dept and this is why the Washington politicians won't stop the clock. They know we're stupid and they don't mind calling us stupid. We keep voting the wrong people in office. Smoking pot in some states is legal now. These are the same people that will pull the lever for the wrong politician at the polls. They don't think right and can't. They're too high. We are our own destiny and it's going down the toilet thanks to people who are here illegally and to those who just don't know this countries history. Everyone who voted for this so called president wants something for nothing. You know who you are! You think this country will survive with 300 million people like you in it? Move to another country for a while. You'll come running back to the protection this country gives you.

 

Jan 17, 2013 2:41AM
avatar

This isn't about parties, it's about giving billions to gluttonous immigrants from the south.  Stop more

taxes, stop the give aways, the budget will be fixed. OR, be indebted forever to these parasites.

Mike

Jan 17, 2013 2:31AM
avatar
Every dollar congress spends should come directly out of their paychecks.  No exception.
Jan 17, 2013 2:29AM
avatar
Yes, we should all pay more taxes, but I have concerns about how that would affect the recovery.  If we could raise taxes in a way that does not damage recovery, then I'm all for it.  I can agree to spending cuts, but I really believe that we must also honor our commitments to the poor, to the elderly, to children, to education and to rebuilding the infrastructure.  You can't have a great country if it is allowed to crumble away for lack of judicious spending. 
Jan 17, 2013 2:29AM
avatar

Should we all pay more taxes is a stupid question when 47% pay no taxes.  Everyone should pay the exact same percentage.  I say 15%.  Everyone.  No deductions, no loopholes.  Congress should be forced to work with that much revenue. 

Jan 17, 2013 2:22AM
avatar

You know, I'm solidly in the middle class living in expensive New York.  I calculated that over the last 12 years counting state, local, federal, sales, gas, energy, and every other tax known to man, that I've paid about $500,000 in taxes - about 50% of my gross pay putting me under a 6 figure yearly salary.  That's definitely middle class in this state.  So what have I gotten for my half a million dollars?

 

The way I see it, it cost me something near $114 per day for the right to drive on a modern road system that is cleared of snow and repaired; see my neighbor's children educated (I have none by choice); have myself, home and property protected; and will receive retirement benefits from the government.  Of course there are all sorts of smaller things that the governments do for me, but what other expense do I have that even comes close to paying for government?  Should this really be that expensive???  I'd find it hard to believe that it should.

Jan 17, 2013 2:20AM
avatar
NO, The politicians need to start living without a debt and quit screwing the people for their own profit. Pork barrell has got to STOP, I don't  know what part of STOP they don't understand. It's very simple if they don't stop spending more than we pay them they get NO PAY until the debt is paid.
Jan 17, 2013 2:08AM
avatar

Before anyone's taxes is increased, I'd like to see a web site put out by the government that details where every dollar of our taxes went for the last ten years.  And I don't  mean a list of categories.  I do mean a list of every program by county, state, city, etc. that the federal monies have been sent to, and by any weapon system, border protection, and social security/medicare per persons grouped by age and state.  This data exists and it's about time We The People understand where our money is being spent and for what.  This also includes grants and loans, general salaries for government employees, and aide to foreign nations. 

 

If you want money from the bank, you have to detail what you are going to use it for.  If We The People are to give more money, then we need to know how it is being used IN DETAIL.  If the federal government needs for us to open our pockets more, then we need to demand more openness in government.  And it needs to be understandable as well.

Jan 17, 2013 1:59AM
avatar
The more they get the more they spent . A lot of those people can't balance ther own accounts so why should we geve them more to play with
Jan 17, 2013 1:59AM
avatar
If they're just going to spend it on dumb sh*t and new military toys, I say no. How about they just cut their spending for a change and leave us pacified, push-overs alone.
Jan 17, 2013 1:48AM
avatar

I was appalled when I turned 15 and  was charged money to get a job.  I can't believe that we are so stupid as a nation that we don't understand how ridiculous it sounds that I have to teach my child that if you want to get a job then you have to pay money to work.  Isn't there a better way?  There has to be a genius out there who can figure this one out.  That doesn't bother anybody?  Oh yeah, the money they took out for disablity is a scam.  I became disabled at 37 when I was diagnosed with a heart defect that has killed three of my siblings.  Guess what.  When I went to get the money back that I paid into the system they told me that I have to pay disability a $1000 a month for the year for medical only.  That's $12,000 a year to go on disability that I will have to pay to die from my condition.  Private insurance is cheaper than that per year.  Does anyone see anything wrong with that picture?

avatar
First of all it would help if Washington would stop spending our money like a drunken sailor out on leave. Second if the middle class has to pay more in taxes it would be nice for the 50% who don't pay anything to federal taxes would stop getting 3000 per child for nothing. They might not be able to pay anything into it but why should they be able to take away from it? If we do have to give someone who has 3 or 4 kids and are on welfare 9 to 12 thousand dollars why don't we give them some of those "jobs that American will not do". I'm sick of the class warfare I'm sick of lazy people who just breed children for free housing,free food, free medical care,a welfare check and then pick our pockets at the end of every year. NO as a middle class taxpayer who works her A$$ off I don't think I should nor do I want to pay more taxes to a government who has not balanced a budget for going on 5 years. If I ran my house like this government runs our country I would be bankrupt. WAIT THIS COUNTRY IS BANKRUPT.
Jan 17, 2013 1:35AM
avatar
If I have to stay in my budget to survive, than so does the government! If I didn't stay in my budget,  I would need assistance. In order for me to get assistance, as a so called " middle class", I would have to either,  loose everything and go on social services. Suppression, in its finest, or cut back on my spending! I am not giving another cent! Matter of fact, the government owes us! They work for us, not vice versa!  I run a family business that has been a loyal tax paying entity for 38 years, the thought of one more penny being squeezed out of me through, sales tax, property tax, school tax, water tax, compensation, down sizing of products, increase operational cost, heating, cooling, ex..I can't see survival much longer. Which now means 12 more people unemployed. As I said, a small family business, ever increasing cost, less consumer spending. People like us should be given breaks, so we can keep our employees,  maybe hire more people. Soon we can all go to Walmart for everything!!! It will be the only place open, because remember, you didn't build that business, the government did it for you.
Jan 17, 2013 1:34AM
avatar

NO TERM limits is the problem!...kick em out after 2 terms MAX

 

Jan 17, 2013 1:33AM
avatar

wrong. the people with $ should pay more. its only logical. theyre the only ones that can afford it.

 

how are people without money supposed to pay more for taxes?

 

whats next? the return of debtor's prisons?

Jan 17, 2013 1:18AM
avatar

You cannot expect middle class families to pay higher taxes because they, like our government, are in debt too. Most of America is in debt, trying to live the life of a movie star and they have been in debt for many years. I cannot help but laugh about commenters who throw stones at anyone who receives food stamps or another type of assistance. It is not that we disagree with helping others in need; we just want our free check too. I think it is about time we grow up and act like we are a country, together. We are in debt and we are going to have to pay for it. There shouldn't be any questions about whether we're willing to accept higher taxes. We just need a leader who says you're going to pay higher taxes and we're going to cut spending. We love our economy and its imperative for growth but all of a sudden, we're struggling to figure out how we're going to pay for that growth. We're pretty messed up culturally and now we get led around by our noses trying to figure out if we're going to pay to take care of the baby-boom generation now or pass the burden on to our kids to pay for later. No question, we are going to pay now by raising taxes and cutting spending, and we are all going to help.

Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

DATA PROVIDERS

Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.

ABOUT SMART SPENDING

Smart Spending brings you the best money-saving tips from MSN Money and the rest of the Web. Join the conversation on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

VIDEO ON MSN MONEY

TOOLS

More