The $500,000 TV
Even if you happen to have the cash and the space to accommodate the set, experts still say to proceed with caution.
This post comes from Charles Passy at partner site MarketWatch.
That's the price tag on Panasonic's model TH-152UX1, billed as the "world's largest, 4K2K plasma display" (we'll get to that 4K2K part in a minute). The set is indeed massive -- equivalent to nine 50-inch screens and weighing in at a whopping 1,272 pounds. (For one installation at a restaurant, a forklift was used to put the TV in place.)
But Panasonic says it's not just about size; it's also about picture quality The 4K2K refers to the resolution -- meaning 4,096 by 2,160 pixels. In other words, it can deliver four times the resolution of a standard high-definition set, says Rick Albert, a Panasonic vice president. Albert adds that the resolution is key for commercial purposes, such as using the set to display graphics or charts at large gatherings. Indeed, the set's target market is the business crowd, not the high-end homeowner.
But Panasonic will sell to individuals as well. In fact, the set, which was first introduced in 2009, got a lot of buzz when Harrods, the famed British luxury-goods retailer, starting offering it.
Panasonic won't give sales figures -- and, by the way, that $500,000 price doesn't include installation -- but the company reveals that the sets are going everywhere from bars and restaurants to the 39th floor of an office building. Put another way, there's big business in really, really big TVs. "Sales of the 152 have exceeded our expectations," says Albert.
Obviously, most couch potatoes aren't prepared to shell out all their retirement savings for a new TV -- and Panasonic readily asserts they needn't do so. The company points to a 50-inch plasma set -- model ST50 -- it offers for under $1,000. There's also the issue of size: 152 inches of television is far too big to be viewed properly in most homes. Experts recommend a set of only 40 inches to 80 inches if you're viewing it from a distance of 10 feet. As the tech-oriented site Gizmodo warned about the Panasonic behemoth: "Just remember to sit a safe distance from the screen to prevent eye strain. Cleveland should do."
But if you happened to have the cash and the space to accommodate the set, experts still say to proceed with caution. For starters, at this point, commercial TV programming isn't transmitted at the high resolution the set offers. Buying a high-def set today "is a bit like buying a color TV in the black-and-white era," says Joe Kane, a TV-calibration expert.
Additionally, there's always a concern about image "burn-in" with plasma. "It doesn't matter how much it costs, plasma is plasma," says Sean Aune, the editor-in-chief of TechnoBuffalo, a gadget-review site.
Panasonic's Albert disagrees with some of the criticisms, saying that the set's picture quality still makes it ideal "for use in a boardroom or large conference room for high-resolution graphics" and that burn-in is essentially a non-issue for the brand at this point. "We are on our 14th- or 15th-generation plasma displays, and the materials used are far more resistant to burn-in than the first generations," says Albert.
It's also worth noting that higher-resolution TV programming is likely to be a reality at some point in the not-too-distant future. "Eventually, the broadcasts will catch up to 4K, and our cable companies will be able to pipe more data into our homes," says calibration expert Kane.
More from MarketWatch and MSN Money:
- 10 things the Super Bowl won't tell you
- Get a big deal on a big TV for the Super Bowl
- Best Buy's Hail Mary: Amy Poehler
- Which Super Bowl ads are already winning?
- Mercedes criticized for Kate Upton Super Bowl spot
- Chicken wing prices take flight
Maybe spend another couple thousand properly mounting them by professionals. I figure if your rich enough to do this you'd hire someone else to do all the work.
Then fork out a couple grand for a decent computer and program that can split up a TV image and display only portions on each TV (you see where I'm going)
It would only be HD not their 4K2K 'super HD' but the human can't see much beyond 720p anyhow.
And this setup would cost you under $20,000.
It's still too small in screen size for me!
I want something at least 200" or more. Aaahhh, technology...!
Neh, Coyboy's Stadium has a 11,200 square foot high def tele that cost $40 MILLION. That's more money than what it cost to build the previous home of the Cowboys, Texas Stadium.
When a TV cvosts more than an entire stadium.....it's BIG, BAD, and took an idiot to commission it's construction. You reading this, Jerry? Get us COACHES and a WINNING TEAM and stuff your television.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
ABOUT SMART SPENDING
LATEST BLOG POSTS
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's complaint database highlights the worst problems people have with collectors.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
BLOGS WE LIKE
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'