Smart TaxesSmart Taxes

3 reasons to fear a dividend tax hike

President Obama has proposed raising the tax on capital gains and dividends from its current 15% rate to the same rates as earned income. Would it hurt more than help?

By MSN Money Partner Feb 28, 2012 8:32PM

This post is by Abram Brown of Forbes.com.

 

President Barack Obama's proposal to raise the tax on dividends should leave investors trembling. It has the ability to affect anyone with an interest in equities, from the executive in the corner suite to the grandmother who lives next door to you.

 

You pay 15% on dividends right now. Under Obama's plan, the wealthiest would see a personal tax rate of nearly 45%. And before a company gives a dividend, that money is taxed as corporate profit. Obama would like to lower the corporate tax rate to 28%.

 

So by the time the dividend reaches your bank account, it has been taxed twice.

 

The corporate-dividend tax hike is part of Obama's broader restructuring of America's corporate tax structure. As a whole, the plan would be a game changer for U.S. business. But the dividend tax increase is the plan's most striking element, since it's hard to identify whom it would help.

 

Here are three reasons to fear the Obama plan:

 

1. It could hamper the shelter behind dividend stocks.

 

A high-yield dividend stock can provide some comfort and stability in volatile times -- a period like the one we're in right now. (Post continues after video.)

If each new day brings a wild swing in the equity market, being able to count on a dividend can seem like a good way to take cover. Money managers can direct clients toward blue-chip companies with sizable dividend yields. Stalwart Coca-Cola just raised its dividend for the 50th straight year.

 

You don’t invest in these types of companies to make money through appreciation or trading, says Mark Lamkin, who manages $250 million at Lamkin Wealth Management. You pick these stocks for their security -- and their dividends. But if those dividends lose their value through higher taxes, these stocks lose their attraction.

 

2. It could increase market volatility.

To make up for what you lose in dividends, you'd probably start trading more. Greater volume can bring volatility. And don’t we have enough volatility as it stands?

 

It would also lead to some investors sitting out entirely, reducing the amount of available capital.

 

"As you increase tax on dividends, you discourage some amount of investment in stocks," says David Stowell, a former UBS managing director. "As you discourage investment in stock, there’s less money to fund companies to produce useful products, to employ people, and I think it really takes some money out of the economy. It certainly seems counterproductive to building a more robust economy."

 

3. It could hurt retirees the most.

 

Americans 65 and older accounted for 42% of dividend income reported to the Internal Revenue Service in 2008, the latest year available.

 

So when Obama suggests raising the tax rate on dividends, he's taking aim right at your retirement nest egg.

 

Your retirement portfolio probably has a lot of dividend stocks right now, because they're predictable. But with higher taxes, money managers would likely shift more toward growth companies and away from dividend-bearing stocks. This is all well and good until that growth stops, says David Armstrong, who manages $200 million at Monumental Wealth Management.

 

What would be likely to halt it? Well, if there was anything remotely like 2008 in the future, that would cause a pretty big jolt.

 

More from Forbes.com and MSN Money:

VIDEO ON MSN MONEY

41Comments
Feb 29, 2012 4:06AM
avatar
Really, it seems as though every time BO wants to raise revenue he heads for the rich or seniors. No, it's not class warfare-----if it walks like a duck, wiggles like a duck, it must be a duck. Truth is, what BO does is so blatantly obvious the foolish part is trying to claim it isn't what it is? You can change the cover, but the book remains the same. BO is a socialist, was, is, and is going to be. His answer to all is government intervention. What did Reverend Jackson say----it's an honor to be the "food stamp" president----can't believe someone actually said that?? No doubt, there's folks who'll believe that.
Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

DATA PROVIDERS

Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.