Smart TaxesSmart Taxes

Does Congress want the IRS to catch tax cheats?

Obama wants to increase the IRS budget and bring in more revenue, but GOP wants to cut the agency's budget.

By MSN Money Partner Mar 2, 2011 7:29PM

This article is by Stephen Ohlemacher of The Associated Press.

Every dollar the Internal Revenue Service spends for audits, liens and seizing property from tax cheats brings in more than $10, a rate of return so good the Obama administration wants to boost the agency's budget.

 

House Republicans, seeing the heavy hand of a too-big government, beg to differ. They've already voted to cut the IRS budget by $600 million this year and want bigger cuts in 2012.

 

The IRS has dramatically increased its pursuit of tax cheats in the past decade: Audits are up, property liens are up and asset seizures are way up. President Barack Obama and Democrats in Congress see stepped up enforcement as a good way to narrow the nation's staggering budget deficit without raising tax rates or cutting popular spending programs.

 

"It makes little sense to cut the agency that collects revenue," said Rep. Jose Serrano of New York, the top Democrat on the House subcommittee that oversees the IRS budget.

 

Article continues below

 

IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman told the committee Tuesday that the $600 million cut in this year's budget would result in the IRS collecting $4 billion less through tax enforcement programs. The Democrat-controlled Senate is unlikely to pass a budget cut that big. But given the political climate on Capitol Hill, Obama's plan to increase IRS spending is unlikely to pass, either.

 

Obama has already increased the IRS budget by 10% since he took office, to nearly $12.5 billion. The president's budget proposal for 2012 would increase IRS spending by an additional 9% -- adding 5,100 employees.

 

Republicans, however, view the IRS as an ideal target in their promise to reduce government spending, in part because the agency will play a big role in implementing Obama's new health care law. If the law survives court challenges, the IRS will administer tax credits for businesses that provide health insurance to employees, as well as credits to help individuals pay for coverage. The agency also is tasked with enforcing the mandate that most Americans buy health insurance, starting in 2014.

 

Obama's 2012 budget proposal for the IRS includes $473 million and 1,269 new positions to start implementing the health care law.

 

"At a time when we have to tighten the belt from a budgetary standpoint, we're seeing massive new responsibilities laid at the doorstep of the IRS and it's making it more difficult for them to meet their charges of enforcement as well as customer service to the taxpayer," said Rep. Charles Boustany, R-La., chairman of the House Ways and Means oversight subcommittee.

 

Republicans want to deprive the agency of money to enforce the new law, but the budget cuts go deeper than health care, reflecting GOP concerns about an agency that touches nearly every business and adult in the nation -- as well as many that operate abroad.

 

"We're hearing from small businesses a repeat of the horror stories from more than 10 years ago," said Rep. Pat Tiberi, R-Ohio, chairman of the House Ways and Means subcommittee on select revenue measures. "I think you will see House Republicans have a real discussion about the role of the IRS in this country as we are trying to grow the economy and create jobs."

 

In the late 1990s, Congress held hearings so taxpayers could relate horror stories about dealing with IRS tax collectors. The hearings resulted in a 1998 law that reorganized the IRS and largely reined it in, guaranteeing taxpayers rights and due process when the IRS files property liens, seizes bank accounts or garnishes wages.

 

The law led to a steep drop in enforcement actions against delinquent taxpayers. From 1997 to 2000, the number of levies, or asset seizures, fell from 3.7 million to 220,000, and the number of liens was nearly cut in half. Agency staffing was gradually reduced from a high of 117,000 employees in 1992 to about 91,000 in 2008.

 

"The IRS has been in what I would call a rebuilding mode to rebuild their workforce from the mid-90s, and their staffing is still about 20% lower than it was in the mid-90s," said Colleen M. Kelley, president of the National Treasury Employees Union, which represents IRS employees. Obama's 2012 budget would bring overall staffing up to 100,500.

 

Enforcement numbers have rebounded, with the agency collecting $57.6 billion last year through enforcement actions -- on an enforcement budget of $5.5 billion. In 2010, the agency used 3.6 million levies to seize assets, and filed nearly 1.1 million property liens.

 

The IRS only takes such action against taxpayers who have ignored numerous notices and who owe significant back taxes. For example, taxpayers who owe at least $10,000 in delinquent taxes and ignore numerous IRS notices would get an automatic lien placed on their property.

 

"From the top down, the IRS has been pushing more for enforcement and sometimes employees overstep those bounds," said Robert McKenzie, a tax lawyer with the firm Arnstein & Lehr LLP of Chicago, and a member of the IRS Advisory Council, which evaluates IRS policies. "People do what they're rewarded for. Right now the IRS reward system for its employees seems to be, you get promoted faster, you get more pay raises, if you're more aggressive than if you seek to work things out with a taxpayer."

 

McKenzie said it would be "stupid" to cut the IRS budget while the nation is grappling with a record $1.5 trillion budget deficit. He suggested that Congress should instead provide more oversight to make sure the agency respects taxpayer rights.

 

Shulman said the agency tries to strike a balance between enforcement and taxpayer service. He recently announced a program to help people struggling to pay delinquent tax bills by reducing the number of property liens and easing rules for small businesses to enter into installment agreements.

 

Rep. Jo Ann Emerson, R-Mo., who chairs the House Appropriations subcommittee that oversees the IRS, said the agency is more respectful of taxpayers' rights than it was in the 1990s. But Congress is in a budget-cutting mood, she said, and the IRS will not be immune.

 

"At the end of the day, a 9% increase is substantial," Emerson said. "I don't see it happening."

Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

 

More from MSN Money:

VIDEO ON MSN MONEY

12Comments
Mar 3, 2011 9:04AM
avatar

Throw the whole tax code away and start over from scratch.  Make it simple enough that a 12 year old could do it.  We then would not need a huge IRS staff and they could really cut their budget.  Most people cannot do their own taxes as it is too confusing.  It is also a huge burden on business.

Mar 6, 2011 11:55AM
avatar
If the IRS wants to find tax cheats, it won't have to go far. Just check out the Congress and the Obama administration. Tim Geitner, Charlie Rangel, former Senator Tom Dashal, just to name a few. I seem to remember a number of nominees for positions in the Obama White House had to withdraw over questions about taxes. All Democrats, by the way. And what about that congressman from Louisana, William Jefferson, I think, who had bribe money in his freezer? I'm sure he paid taxes on that. So I'm all for going after tax cheats-lets just make sure the fat cats and politicians are the first ones we look at. Also, let's make sure they are treated the same as any other citizen, with all the outrageous fines and interest the IRS just loves to bury the average citizen with. Yeah,like that will ever happen.
Mar 7, 2011 4:27PM
avatar

Senator John Kerry from Massachusetts recently had a custom yacht built.  When the boat was delivered, he docked it in Rhode Island even though he uses it around Massachusetts and Cape Cod.  He did this to avoid Massachusetts taxes.  Someone found out about this and reported him.  The press were all over him in Mass. and he was embarrassed.  Then he came out and said that he would pay the taxes.  Members of Congress are the tax cheats. 

 

In 2010, Mass. Democratic auditor candidate Suzanne Bump was discovered taking a tax break for 2 homes she had in 2 different communities, claiming that both were her "primary" & "principal" residences.    Fu**ing hypocrites.

Mar 3, 2011 7:07PM
avatar
Why don't we tax welfare, they cash their checks at casino's.  I live on S.S. and can't afford to gamble. 
Mar 2, 2011 10:13PM
avatar
Obviously they would like to underfund it, can't find cheaters if there's no one watching the store. I think I saw a poll a month or so ago, said that 85% of people did not cheat on taxes. If they redid that poll, I wonder how it turned out under different economic household incomes? I am quite sure as my father was an account that we know the rich are far more likely to cheat on taxes than the poor. Poor have everything to lose, where the rich will just be fined, boohoo.
Mar 10, 2011 9:03AM
avatar
The problem with the IRS cracking down on "tax cheats" is that you are presumed guilty of being a tax cheat until you can prove that you're innocent.  And since there is no judge and jury it is almost impossible to prove. 

I've known people who were audited who provided all the evidence requested by the IRS, at considerable cost.  So the IRS requested more evidence and more evidence.  Finally, they all realized that it was going to cost them thousands of dollars to defend a $500 deduction.  It just wasn't worth it.  It costs the IRS almost nothing to crank out some letters demanding evidence and the taxpayer spends thousands responding or has to pay the increased tax.

Mar 5, 2011 6:58PM
avatar
I'd like to see the IRS go after Tax Cheats like Elliott Ness went after Gangsters. 
Mar 8, 2011 12:01AM
avatar
This is about Obama's health care taxes. It is not about tax cheats. They want to enforce and unpopular law. That the taxpayers do not want. Also many poor that  have talked to. Do not want the government telling what they what to do.
Mar 9, 2011 12:41PM
avatar
It's funny to read post on this site. People are always pointing the finger at everyone else! It's the poor blaming the wealthy. Rep. blaming the Dems. and vise versa! No one every takes the blame! It's always someone else's fault for your troubles! If you don't like the way things are going in your life or in society, get off your **** doing something to change it!
Mar 9, 2011 7:59PM
avatar
Obama wants 16,000 new IRS agents.  They aren't going to be helping collect back taxes.  His own administration hasn't paid their taxes.  They don't have to pay, Obama doesn't make them, or fire them for not paying taxes.  He is afraid he would have no one left.  His HHS secreatary owed taxes, he didn't care.  They must have made a mistake.  He wouldn't make all off shore banks give the USA their lists.  He knew he would have opened a pandora's box and his Democratic friends would be paying millions in taxes.
Mar 9, 2011 7:20PM
avatar

I'm not sure why I hadn't thought of that.  It makes sense to underfund the agency that may be targeting you.  Perhaps that is why the IRS mainly seizes the property of middle class and lower class citizens, they can't put up much of a fight.  Easier pickings.

 

Then again, some of the richie riches may have bigger targets worth going after.

Mar 3, 2011 12:35PM
avatar

The I R S has to fight corruption in tax filling searching the matter of Dependents and the Itemization matter where the leak of money of Treasury Department and the fraud it is made alarmingly.

Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

DATA PROVIDERS

Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.