12/15/2011 8:40 PM ET|
Endangered tax breaks and benefits
Many tax deductions and subsidies are set to expire this year or in 2012 unless Congress steps in to save them. Could any of these raise your tax bill?
As Congress and President Barack Obama head into an election year, tax reform has emerged as a key roadblock to lowering the nation's debt -- and ultimately reviving America's economy and competitive edge.
Beginning in the George W. Bush presidency and continuing into the Obama era, national spending and tax revenue have diverged dramatically.
"We are rapidly approaching a time when the tax system we have will be unable to support the government that we want," said Howard Gleckman, a tax expert and resident fellow at the Urban Institute. "It's being held together by bubble gum and baling wire."
Bush-era tax cuts, as well as long-in-place tax breaks, expire at the end of 2011. Meanwhile, other established tax provisions will remain hot topics (and fair game) into the election year, as political and ideological rhetoric increases over how to reduce the nation's budget.
We asked Gleckman, author of the Tax Policy Center's TaxVox blog, and Dean Zerbe, the national managing director at the Alliant Group and a former tax counsel for the Senate Finance Committee, for their take on these tax cuts and subsidies.
Read on to see the most endangered tax provisions.
Capital gains and the 'Buffett Rule'
Obama got a lot of attention in September when he rolled out a deficit reduction plan including his "Buffett Rule" -- that no one making more than $1 million should pay a lower tax rate than the middle class.
In targeting this income group (whose income averages about $2.9 million annually), Obama recognizes that they make most of their money from investments. A few of these very high earners make more than two-thirds of their income from capital gains and dividends, which are taxed at 15%, said Bob Williams on the TaxVox blog.
While current rates expire at the end of 2012, the Obama administration would raise capital gains rates even as it cuts rates on ordinary income. For now, rates continue at historic lows for long-term capital gains and dividends. For taxpayers in the 15% income tax bracket and below, the rate is zero. For those in the 25% bracket and above, the rate is 15%.
The prospects of the "Buffett Rule" becoming law, however, are weak, with strong opposition among congressional Republicans. GOP presidential hopeful Mitt Romney would drop the rate on gains and dividends to zero for most taxpayers, with those making more than $200,000 still having to pay 15%, Gleckman said.
Research and development credit for businesses
The research and development tax credit celebrated its 30th anniversary in September. The basic credit rate is 20% and expires Dec. 31. Historically, the credit has been extended for a year or two and sometimes was allowed to expire and be restored retroactively, said Gleckman.
Although the tax credit is popular, there's room for improvement, said the Alliant Group's Zerbe. For example, raising the credit and offering a higher rate for small businesses would be a good start.
Both the administration and Congress have proposed raising the R&D tax credit as well as the related alternative simplified credit, or ASC, a simpler way for businesses to calculate the credit. "It can be a life saver for a small-business owner," Zerbe said.
IRA charitable donation
Congress extended this popular provision through 2011, but it will lapse in 2012 if lawmakers don't act. Donors older than 70½ may contribute up to $100,000 of IRA assets directly to one or more qualified charities. While there's no deduction, the gift is excluded from income, The Wall Street Journal reports.
More broadly, deductions that wealthier taxpayers claim will continue to be targeted by Republicans and Democrats heading into 2012. The White House has said that most of the cost of Obama's payroll tax cut and other job initiatives would be covered by limiting the deductions claimed by wealthier taxpayers.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Why not just cap the Schedule A at 35,000 then? That saves the middle class but eliminates the ficticious claims of the rich.
I'm all for the following... all increase revenues... helps middle class.
1. Cap the Schedule A to 35,000
2. Make a law you can't get back more than you put in... sorry people who only put in $500 and "expect" to get $5,000 time to work for your money
3. Raise the top tiers 5% each.
Everyone then put forth something other than the middle class who are working as it is. nothing "earned" is lost. If you are poor and want a bigger refund check then you need to work for your refund not just get a handout.
We are rapidly approaching a time when the tax system we have will be unable to support the government that we want,"
OMGod!! Who the heck wants government that is that BIG????
Where is the money going to come from?? From scraping by shrinking middle class..
Bring back jobs, manufacturing and personal responsibility!
End welfare for these idiotic girls who get knocked up just to collect money and then do it over and over again!
Then must use birth control and get trained to do some job!
End Corporate welfare to.. bring our money back from off shore accounts!\
End life fime pensions for politicians!
End 'pork barreling'
End 'exemptions' for insider trading for elected officials...
There you go just for starters... more revenue and NO new taxes or entitlements
This whole thing is a mess..
This is an attack on the middle class which is already in jeopardy of becoming extinct in our country. I completely agree with KONx - this will be a huge cut to those of us who still have mortgages if they take our deduction away. I itemize this deduction every year. I am single with no children so I'm taxed above and beyond by Uncle Sam. I don't have any real deductions except my house. I pay a higher tax rate because I'm single because apparently Uncle Sam wants to punish me for not walking down the aisle. I don't have any kids to write off because even though I count my dogs as children the IRS does not.
If they take this deduction away, which is thousands for me every year, then I will have to seriously consider if home ownership is even worth it. In an already slumping real estate market does our government really want even less home ownership?
We are already at historic lows and the so called American Dream of the white picket fence is a far stretch for the average American.
Seriously Congress - cut the middle class some slack! Quit attacking us! We can't afford it. We are struggling day in and day out as it is. I don't care which side of the political fence you are on. The bottom line is that our current government (on BOTH sides) is killing our country.
Do something America! Stand up and tell them enough is enough. We need financial stability. We need an opportunity to succeed. Quit beating us down! The middle class backs are breaking under the pressure. We cannot carry this load anymore!!!!
Unless trade is balanced, all the measures mentioned in this article will be temporarily. It is quite sad to see that trade deficits are not even mentioned and they are one of the main reasons for our financial troubles (besides all the wars Washington does).
Corporations have no loyalty to any country. The only thing they want is money and more return on their investments. That being said, 50 years ago or so, when global trade was not at the level it is now, big corporations in the US were stuck in the US; in other words, US economy was fitting more or less a closed economy model. This has not been the case for few decades now. Our economy is an open economy, thus acting like it is closed is a complete nonsense. There is a constant flux of money out of the system, but no one does anything about it. On top of that, the trade we have with our “partners” is anything but fair – starting from their policies and getting to their labor “practices”…
"The tax system we have can't support the Government" --------GOOD!
The Government we have doesn't represent me or anyone I know or have ever or will ever know. Right now it's set up for the corporations. It's time for a change and this is the kind of change we need. It's time for the Government to get back to being "Of the people, by the people and for the people."
LEAVING YOU WITH THIS THOUGHT, ITS NOT THE WE THE PEOPLE THAT HAVE TO ABIDE BY THE LAWS OUR GOVERNMENT IS CREATING THAT IS AFFECTING THE ECONOMY.
ITS THE WE THE PEOPLE IN WASHINGTON THAT HAVE FORGOTTEN THAT THEY ARE TO BE A GOVERNING BODY MAKING LAWS TO PROTECT THIS LAND, NOT AN OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE THEMSELVES RICH.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.