Next-generation consoles may be capable of killing cable television, if consumers can be convinced they're home entertainment systems and not 'just video game machines.'

By MSN Money Partner Feb 20, 2013 8:47PM


Sony PlayStationBy Josh Herr, The Fiscal Times  The Fiscal Times on MSN Money


Sony (SNE), the troubled Japanese electronics company, may have one last big chance to dominate the television universe again.


But it won’t be because of 3-D TV, 4K TV, Blue-Ray DVDs or other such technology.  At an event tonight in New York, the company is announcing the “future of the PlayStation,” which most think could be the future of television.

 

After seven long years, PlayStation 3, one of the two big names in gaming consoles, is getting an upgrade.  Experts think it’s going to be big. This is hardly a surprise. Microsoft's (MSFT) pending announcement of the Xbox 720 has been the worst-kept secret in gaming for months now. (Microsoft owns MSN Money.)


The current generation of consoles is now well past the typical five-year lifespan for such gadgets. Gamers and developers have been screaming for updated hardware that would allow them to take advantage of advances in graphics and software that the current boxes just can’t handle.

 

Why we care

Media commentators and industry observers have been debating whether consoles are dead or dying -- whether Sony and Microsoft lost a loyal user base by waiting so long to update their hardware.


Why do we care?  Because millions of people globally have made gaming an $82 billion a year business. So no one will be surprised why Sony is banking on its new product. 


The bigger question is . . . what is it going to be? The obvious answer is that it will be a video game machine, but increasingly the definition of a gaming console is fuzzy.


Think back to 1972 when Atari rolled out Pong -- originally a machine that let you play digital ping pong. The success of Pong inspired a first-generation of home consoles in the early '80s that expanded the concept. From the classic Atari 2600 through the Nintendo era, the cartridge model ruled the gaming world. 


The '90s brought CD-Rom gaming and eventually DVDs. The technology might have improved, but the process remained the same. Customers purchased the hardware and then bought packaged software titles incrementally.


Apps for free

But that model, like many of the older technology models, is increasingly under threat in the digital age, as consumers grow used to downloading apps and streaming content from the cloud.


The traditional economics of console systems is challenging. The next generation of gaming boxes will retail for around $399. A single (new) video game runs $60, and there is much speculation that the additional resources required to develop for the new high-end graphics cards will drive the price of an individual game even higher. For an average family struggling through the recession, that’s an awful lot of money to spend just to play a video game.


Additionally, the used-game market has done much to gut the industry. Unlike music, gamers are much less likely to pull out an old favorite from even so much as two years ago. With a few exceptions, when a player is done with a game, which can typically take two or three months, he’s done forever.


This led to the rise of stores such as GameStop (GME), which built a business around the second-hand market. An experienced shopper knows that a $60 game will be available for $30 in six months. And with games becoming bigger and more involved, a gamer may buy no more than two or three games a year.


Too many gamers?

Ironically, the industry has also been damaged by the proliferation of gamers. Typically, the image of a "gamer" has been that of a shy loner with poor social skills. (An image the media often cites in the wake of events like Newtown). The download statistics on runaway successes like Angry Birds and Fruit Ninja prove that everyone from tiny kids to Dick Cheney is now a gamer.


Those gaming apps for mobile devices run $4.99 or less, and often are available for free  -- a price that's pretty hard to beat. Last year, the U.S. market for new video games totaled $7.1 billion, according to the NPD Group. Spending on used and rented games reached $1.8 billion. And digital gaming downloads and subscriptions, including mobile and social gaming, totaled $5.9 billion. So traditional sales represented less than half of the  total, and spending on physical content fell 21% as sales of digital content grew 16%.


The trends are pretty clear, and as mobile app makers roll out increasingly more sophisticated, engaging and cheaper games for phones and tablets, the question becomes "what is the point of buying a console?"


The smartphone actually answers that question best. Consumers tend to view these devices as phones with a fair share of bells and whistles, but they don’t often consider the shear bulk of standalone devices that the iPhone and its ilk have rendered obsolete. The Palm Pilot, point-and-shoot cameras, Walkmen/Discmen/iPods, day planners, Gameboys, the watch, the map, the compass and the daily newspaper have all been turned into relics of a bygone age, replaced with one single convenient device.


Cable killer?

This is the model that tech giants have long pursued in the battle for your living room, competing to supply the Internet-connected hub of a multi-pronged, multi-screen entertainment experience. In the same way that the smartphone has replaced all of those more limited devices, the PS4 and the Xbox 720 will likely take aim at all of those boxes under your TV: the DVD player, the DVR, the streaming device and -- most importantly -- the cable box.


For many owners of gaming boxes, this is already a reality. A large selling point of the PS3 was that it featured a Blu-ray player at a cheaper price than standalone Blu-ray players. Currently most streaming video services are available through PS3 and Xbox players. In fact, more people are using PS3’s to stream Netflix to their TV than any other single device.


There are of course cheaper standalone streaming devices, such as the Roku. But the next generation of consoles could mean the death of cable television as we know it.


The new machines will be a one-stop shop for all media needs. The ability to access your files on networked computers, download movies and music from the PlayStation store, and customize music channels will still be an important part of the package. And of course, unlike the Roku, the PlayStation plays top-of-the-line games.


Cable television providers, with their continued lock on premium content, are most threatened.

HBO’s refusal to release HBO Go to non-subscribers shows that media and cable companies like HBO’s parent, Time Warner (TWX), know what would happen if customers could get their "Game of Thrones" fix without having to pay for the Cooking Channel or the Golf Channel.


Sports, news and other live events have also kept home users bound to cable, but services such as the MLB.TV live streaming package allow subscribers to get all of their favorite team’s games directly through a Roku, PS3, Xbox 360 and both Samsung and Apple TVs.


The winning box

As all of these individual boxes and services increasingly overlap, it’s easy to imagine that they will eventually be integrated into one single box that serves all of our various devices and screens. The maker of that winning box could rule the market.


Console owners are already accustomed to using the devices in this manner, so it’s not hard to see them upgrading to a new generation of PlayStation or Xbox. But for Sony or Microsoft to really break through, they will have to convince traditional home entertainment users that the new products are much more than "just video game machines."


With Sony’s announcement, we’ll have a better sense of whether the next PlayStation will be a real step toward that future or another sign of a company struggling to recapture its past.


More from The Fiscal Times

 

As Google's share price surpasses $800 for the first time, Wall Street's perceptions of the two tech titans are starting to diverge. But investors are notoriously fickle.

By TheStreet Staff Feb 19, 2013 3:51PM

Smartphone warsBy Chris Ciaccia 


thestreet logoThe fortunes of Google (GOOG) and Apple (AAPL) have become polar opposites on Wall Street, as Google's share price surpasses $800 for the first time and Apple's free-fall continues.

 

Investors think that Google, as led by CEO Larry Page, seemingly can do no wrong. That's how Apple was perceived for much of the past few years, but that's quickly changed. 


Apple shares have shed 19% over the past three months, while Google is up 20% over the period.

 

A strong stock market is setting the stage for more tech firms to go public. These companies should be on radar screens of tech investors.

By StreetAuthority Feb 19, 2013 1:05PM
Twitter website (© Jonathan Hordle/Rex Features)By David Sterman    
                                       
Investment bankers are a fickle lot. When the market takes a tumble, they tell their soon-to-go-public banking clients to withdraw their plans for an initial public offering (IPO). But when the market is stable and rising, as has been the case in recent months, then they scramble back to those clients, telling them the time to complete the IPO has arrived.

As long as the market avoids an air pocket in 2013, then the coming year could prove to be a very active period for IPOs. Indeed, we're off to a good start: There has been $5 billion worth of IPOs completed thus far this year, according to Dealogic. The tech-heavy slate of upcoming IPOs is being led by the debut of Xoom (XOOM), an online money-transfer service that was the first tech IPO of 2013.

Here are 10 other fast-growing tech companies being cajoled by investment bankers to take the plunge. A few of them may end up in your portfolio before the year is out.
 

The company's subscribers may place a higher value on TV series, which are more conducive to 'binge viewing' and are superior at engaging a fan base.

By Minyanville.com Feb 15, 2013 6:56PM

"House of Cards," the much-hyped original series from 
Minyanville logo
Netflix (NFLX), has received mostly positive reviews since it was released earlier this month. The $100 million production is part of Netflix’s strategic move to use original content to attract and retain subscribers.

Original shows can also help the video-streaming service "become HBO faster than HBO can become us,” as Netflix’s Chief Content Officer Ted Sarandos said in an interview with GQ.
 
More original series have been lined up, including the eagerly awaited resurrection of the cult favorite comedy "Arrested Development,"  which will be released in April.

The pivot toward original programming, made in the face of rising content-acquisition costs, seems to have pleased Wall Street -- Netflix shares are up 105% year to date.
 
Given the positive reception to its original series, an obvious question is whether original movies might be the next stage of the company's content-development strategy
 

Waiting for Apple's chief to address the numerous questions on the minds of investors is an exercise in futility.

By The Fiscal Times Feb 14, 2013 11:59AM
Apple iPhoneBy Suzanne McGee 

The Fiscal Times logoForget about the frustrations of waiting for Godot, as depicted in Samuel Beckett’s famous play. Waiting for Apple CEO Tim Cook to say anything significant to address the numerous questions that weigh on the minds of many investors -- and that appear to be weighing heavily on the company’s stock price -- may be just as much of an exercise in futility.

As market indexes have crept ever closer to their highest levels since 2007 in recent weeks, Apple’s (AAPL) share price has largely moved in the opposite direction. The company’s earnings, as impressive as they were, disappointed Wall Street, and so far there is no clear indication of what the company will do in order to return to the days of high growth and high margins.
 

DATA PROVIDERS

Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.

ABOUT TECHBIZ

Start investing in technology companies with help from financial writers and experts who know the industry best. Learn what to look for in a technology company to make the right investment decisions.

RECENT QUOTES

WATCHLIST

Symbol
Last
Change
Shares
Quotes delayed at least 15 min

MARKET UPDATE

NAMELASTCHANGE% CHANGE
There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.
NAMELASTCHANGE% CHANGE
There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.
Market index data delayed by 15 minutes

[BRIEFING.COM] The stock market ended the Thursday session on a modestly lower note, but a late-morning rebound lifted the indices off their lows. The S&P 500 shed 0.2% with seven sectors ending in the red.

This morning, European equities and U.S. futures slumped around 6:00 ET after Ukraine's President Petro Poroshenko was quoted as saying Russian forces have invaded an area southeast of Donetsk. The news pressured the markets, but a brief uptick took place after a correction to ... More


Currencies

NAMELASTCHANGE% CHANGE
There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.

MSN MONEY'S