Sandberg: Facebook study 'poorly communicated'
The company's No. 2 executive responds to backlash over a psychological experiment conducted on nearly 700,000 of its users.
By R. Jai Krishna, The Wall Street Journal
Facebook's (FB) psychological experiment on nearly 700,000 unwitting users was communicated "poorly," Sheryl Sandberg, the company's No. 2 executive, said Wednesday.
It was the first public comment on the study by a Facebook executive since the furor erupted in social-media circles over the weekend.
"This was part of ongoing research companies do to test different products, and that was what it was; it was poorly communicated," Sandberg, Facebook's chief operating officer, said while in New Delhi. "And for that communication we apologize. We never meant to upset you."
Sandberg was in India meeting with smaller-sized businesses that advertise on Facebook. The company is working with advertisers outside the U.S. to launch campaigns that are more tailored to local markets. She was meeting with entrepreneurs and businesswomen as part of her "Lean In" campaign when she commented on the study.
The uproar centered on Facebook's one-week experiment in 2012, in which the company's data scientists enabled an algorithm to determine whether lowering the number of positive or negative posts in users' news feeds could prompt them to post more positive or negative content.
The research, published in the March issue of the Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, sparked soul-searching and questions among researchers and ethicists over the social network's ability to tweak its users' emotions.
"We take privacy and security at Facebook really seriously because that is something that allows people to share" opinions and emotions, Sandberg said.
– Reed Albergotti contributed to this article.
More from The Wall Street Journal
I fear the day that technology will surpass our human interaction. The world will have a generation of idiots.
...Sorry Al, too late.
And that's further driven home by their locking nearly 3/4 a million users out of their accounts while giving them no recourse and no way to even communicate to anyone who could do anything. How could that possibly help any study?
Facebook must be paying the media to stroke their cocks on this by calling it a study and claiming the data collected was beneficial to science. STOP REPORTING THESE LIES!! They're not paying you enough to say it was ethical. How could they be paying you enough to tell these other lies?
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
Start investing in technology companies with help from financial writers and experts who know the industry best. Learn what to look for in a technology company to make the right investment decisions.
Forget Facebook: DataCoup allows users to sell their private data directly to businesses. But will consumers feel comfortable taking them up on the offer?
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'