Facebook IPO: How to play the big pop
If you want to invest for the long term, it may make sense to wait -- maybe as long as six months after the stock's inevitable first-day pop.
Facebook shares will soon be available to the public, but if you want to invest on the long side, it may make sense to wait -- maybe as long as six months after the inevitable first-day pop.
"Facebook is a global public brand and as a result there are a lot of people that feel they understand Facebook -- they understand what Facebook is all about. Whether they do or not is a whole separate issue," says Bob Ackerman, founder of venture capital firm Allegis Capital. "There's that level of visibility that serves to expand demand for the stock, at least initially, and if you look at that breath of demand based on this high profile public image versus supply it looks like it probably ought to pop"
If Ackerman is right, it may not be such a good thing for the shares for the next few months.
Of the seven initial public offerings of technology companies since 2011 to rise more than 50% within their first two days of trading, only one rose additionally through the next 180 days, tweeted Ted Tobiason, head of technology equity capital markets at Deutsche Bank.
A massive run-up in a company's shares shortly after an offering is priced suggests the deal should have been priced higher. That would have allowed the company to make more money, as opposed to shareholders lucky enough to get an allocation before the shares become available on the open market.
Post continues below.
Facebook could have chosen to avoid the pop by doing a Dutch auction-style offering, as Google (GOOG) did in 2004.
In that type of offering, rarely used in IPOs, shares go to the highest bidders rather than being allocated to investors by the investment banks underwriting the deal. That method worked well for Google, which rose less than one percent in its first day of trading, and a month later was up by a healthy but not unsustainable 20%.
It also enabled Google's users to invest in the company without being subjected to wild share price swings that had more to do with the oddities of the IPO pricing process than the business in which they were investing.
"It was very important to [Google founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page] that those who helped build the company were able to participate in the IPO and that was something you could only do in an auction," says Lise Buyer, who helped implement Google's IPO as head of business optimization, and now runs Class V Group, an IPO consulting firm.
By contrast, Buyer says, Facebook is going the traditional IPO route.
"That is certainly the safe way. It's the nobody ever got fired for buying IBM approach. And so if it goes askew -- if they have a massive pop and then it eases off -- well, there are certainly a lot of companies that have had that issue before."
One thing that is slightly unusual about Facebook's IPO is the number of underwriters it is using--32 different investment banks, according to the company's latest S-1 filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Buyer notes that Google did the same thing, however.
She argues the reason is partly because Google is a big company selling a lot of stock and so it makes sense to have "a large army of sales reps working for you."
She also notes that hiring so many underwriters ensures Facebook will have plenty of research coverage, while also giving an opportunity to smaller, specialized and in some cases minority-owned firms "to try to be inclusive."
"None of the banks are going to get rich off of this deal, but all of them will use the fact that they were involved in Facebook as a marketing tool for years to come," Buyer says.
Allegis's Ackerman believes the large group of underwriters enables Facebook to show Wall Street who's boss.
"The broader that banker syndicate is the more control is vested in Facebook," he says.
Neither Buyer nor Ackerman expect Facebook's IPO to have many major implications for other companies, however.
"The only companies that will be really directly impacted by Facebook's IPO will be companies that look like Facebook and there aren't any others at the moment," Buyer says.
A Facebook spokeswoman declined to comment for this article.
Google priced at $85 and closed its first day at a bit over $100, for an initial return of about 18%. Did you mean from the open to the close of the first day of trading?
"In that type of offering, rarely used in IPOs"
We Americans tend to forget that we're not the whole world. You mean that it's rarely used in the U.S., but there's been hundreds of IPO auctions around the world. Or perhaps you mean rarely used in the 21st century, given what a bad track record auction IPOs had around the world in the 1980s and 1990s.
"Facebook could have chosen to avoid the pop by doing a Dutch auction-style offering"
Do you have any evidence whatsoever for this? Of the hundreds of these that have been done in more than two dozen countries, can you point to even one country in which auction IPOs have priced shares accurately? Or do you mean simply about zero on average, but of course with a huge variance?
In theory, auctions price IPO shares very poorly, using auction theory that fits the circumstances of IPOs. In practice, the reason so many countries have rejected this method is because it's worked so poorly. So what, exactly, were you basing your claims on?
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Start investing in technology companies with help from financial writers and experts who know the industry best. Learn what to look for in a technology company to make the right investment decisions.
Starting next summer, every smartphone sold in California must have an anti-theft device. But many users don't have to wait to safeguard their phones.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
MUST-SEE ON MSN
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'