5 reasons the Facebook IPO is no Google

This time it's harder for small investors to win big.

By MSN Money Partner May 16, 2012 2:58PM
By John Shinal

 

MarketWatchWhen it comes to comparing blockbuster Internet IPOs, make no mistake: The sequel produced by Facebook will be a bigger hit than the original from Google (GOOG) eight years ago.

 

At the same time, however, the very success of this week’s Facebook offering will make it harder for retail investors to make the kind of money on its shares that they did on Google, which tripled in their first year.

 

Simply put, if you don’t already own Facebook shares, you’re late to the party.

 

1. A different investing climate

The current mania for Facebook shares had no parallel back in the day of Google’s IPO. In the summer of 2004, with the memory of the dot-com bust still fresh, the mood among big-moneyed institutional investors for tech stocks was downright hostile. The only other tech company of note to execute an IPO that year was Salesforce.com (CRM).

 

What’s more, multiple gaffes by Google’s founders in the run-up to the IPO -- including an ill-advised Playboy magazine interview that had to be included in the prospectus -- damaged the management team’s credibility.

 

Confusion over the unorthodox, quasi-Dutch auction method used to allocate Google shares also hurt the offering. In the end, Google was forced to reduce the price of its IPO by nearly one-third. Moreover the company reduced the number of shares sold by 20%.

 

Consider this fact: Three weeks after the offering, you could have bought Google shares for the same price they opened at on the day of the IPO.

 

By contrast, the Facebook IPO has been by the book, and the only thing resembling drama has been CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s decision to wear a hoodie for his first road show meeting.

 

Facebook’s debut has been preceded by more than a half-dozen other Internet IPOs, which have helped drum up interest in social media companies. Given that Facebook is more profitable than any of those other companies, including LinkedIn (LNKD), Groupon (GRPN) and Zynga (ZNGA), their offerings have served as a perfect preview to Facebook’s.

 

The road show leading up to this epic deal has received the kind of attention once reserved for rock star reunions. Demand for its shares is so strong that on Monday the company raised the bottom end of its share price range by 21%, to $34 a share vs. $28 previously.

 

While that’s great for Facebook and its early investors who are unloading the shares, the price-hike will make it that much tougher for retail investors to cash in. (see No. 5 below)

 

2. A bigger, older company

Facebook’s larger offering shouldn’t be a surprise. On the eve of its IPO, it’s an older and larger company than Google was when it went public. It is also growing more slowly at this point, compared with the numbers Google was posting back then.

 

During the quarter in which went public, Google had revenue of $805.9 million, more than double the sum it recorded the comparable quarter a year earlier.

 

For all of 2004, Google sales increased even faster than that, totaling to $3.2 billion. By comparison, Facebook in its current quarter will post revenue of $1.25 billion if it continues on roughly the same sequential revenue-growth trajectory it has been on over the past eight quarters. That figure would represent growth of 40% from a year earlier.

 

In annual terms, analysts expect Facebook sales just north of $5 billion, a 35% rise from 2011.

 

3. A bigger addressable market

Google and Facebook are both in the business of selling Internet advertising, but it’s a very different business today from what it was eight years ago.

 

Online advertising spending totaled $9.6 billion in 2004, and was rising at an annual rate of 33% according to research from the Internet Advertising Bureau, an industry trade group. Last year, that figure reached $31.7 billion, a rise of 22%.

 

If such spending rises a reasonable 20% this year, it will reach $38 billion. That means its market is four times larger than Google’s was at the time it went public.

 

Indeed the size of that market is a big reason for the strong demand for Facebook shares.

 

4. More mania

Even before it filed for its IPO three months ago, Facebook had already raised roughly $2.3 billion from private investors. That is about 10 times the $25.1 million that Google had raised before its offering.

 

Here’s another way to look at it: Facebook, even before going public, has raised more money than the $1.67 billion Google raised in its IPO.

 

The size of Facebook’s previous funding rounds means that the company essentially has already conducted an offering of stock to a broad pool of outside investors.

 

Given the competition among private investors to get in on those funding rounds, it’s easy to argue that Facebook’s valuation has been inflated by a bubblelike mentality. The current mania for its IPO shares means its price on the public markets will reflect the same froth.

 

The year it went public, Google posted fully diluted net income of $1.46 a share. That means its IPO price of $85 a share was 58 times its expected annual earnings.

 

5. A much richer valuation

While that’s much higher than the price of the broader market, which currently trades for a P/E of just under 13 times expected earnings, it’s a bargain compared with where Facebook will likely be changing hands later this week.

 

While there is not yet a Wall Street consensus on Facebook’s earnings outlook, various analyst reports peg the company’s 2012 profit in a range of 35 to 50 cents a share.

 

If Facebook ends this week trading at $50 a share -- and that price may prove conservative, given the mania surrounding its IPO -- its valuation will be priced at 100 times the most optimistic earnings projections.

 

With that kind of rich valuation, Facebook is priced to perfection, and few companies execute perfectly.

 

Maybe Facebook will. But looking at the numbers compared with Google’s stock, it’s clear it will be much tougher for retail investors to score big on this deal.

 

More from MarketWatch

 

13Comments
May 17, 2012 10:44AM
avatar
Facebook is on it's way out. I don't know why anyone would invest in it.
May 17, 2012 10:53AM
avatar
The only people who will make money on this IPO are the people who already own part of Facebook. They are cashing out for a reason. Would you buy shares of MySpace today? That's where Facebook is heading.
May 17, 2012 11:16AM
avatar
Ever hear of the dot com bubble. Facebook has no solid assets. it really thinks that you are the asset as long as you still use it. Go in low, sale high and stay away fast.
May 17, 2012 11:33AM
avatar
I dont think facebook is the right place for advertising. I have always wondered how they were generating revenue. I can see it as a subscribed service but not for advertising. I can also see them selling aggregate data on consumers reflecting patterns and trends in the consumer mentality. But thats all.
May 17, 2012 12:17PM
avatar
I agree with Mac.  Their leading dmographic is women over 40... ask any teen ager and they will tell you Face book is over.  remember companies IPO because they need money.
May 17, 2012 11:50AM
avatar

6. Barriers to Entry

Google developed a very sophisticated, proprietary search engine that would be extremely challenging to duplicate. Facebook is a silly little web application that any junior developer could reverse engineer.

 

May 17, 2012 2:20PM
avatar
face book is and likely will be as they have said a passing feetable thing same as myspace to cause both aren't trying to keep up with what there suppose to really be
May 17, 2012 2:28PM
avatar
I'm unsure about this one, some say that Facebook is on it's way out, I have to say I don't think it's on their way out just yet. I know a lot of kids that still use it. I hate it, still use it. I know it's just like Myspace and soon will not be in the in crowd. No doubt it'll go uot of style eventually, and Google probably won't but for now, for the next AT LEAST 3-4 years Facebook is in.
May 18, 2012 12:24PM
avatar
"$2.3 billion is about 10 times the $25.1 million"?  Please do the math again (possibly to the advantage of the point you're trying to make).
Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

DATA PROVIDERS

Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.

ABOUT TECHBIZ

Start investing in technology companies with help from financial writers and experts who know the industry best. Learn what to look for in a technology company to make the right investment decisions.

RECENT POSTS

Harvard scientists develop swarm of robots

Like a mechanical flash mob, the group of about a thousand tiny robots can work together -- like bees or army ants -- in vast numbers without guidance.

VIDEO ON MSN MONEY

RECENT QUOTES

WATCHLIST

Symbol
Last
Change
Shares
Quotes delayed at least 15 min

MSN MONEY'S