5 Apple secrets revealed in its battle against Samsung

A court case is forcing Apple to divulge its closest secrets, including the origin story of the iPhone -- and abortive plans to build an Apple car.

By TheWeek.com Aug 7, 2012 11:23AM

Apple (AAPL) is "one of the world's most secretive companies," says Ian Sherr at The Wall Street Journal, and it's "finding there's a price tag in pushing its grievances against rival Samsung (SSNLF) in federal court: Disclosure." In its quest to prove that Samsung has stolen its designs for the iPhone and iPad, Apple's top officials have been forced to testify about their company's creative process and marketing campaigns, details of which have long been held close to the vest. 


From an abandoned plan to build an Apple car to the Fight Club-like levels of security that surrounded the development of the iPhone, here are 5 secrets Apple revealed in its legal dispute with Samsung:


Post continues below.

 

1. Even the iPhone's creators didn't know what they were working on ... at first
When former CEO Steve Jobs tapped Scott Forstall, the head designer of Apple's iOS operating system, to build the iPhone in 2004, he gave Forstall some "pretty wild restrictions," says Eric Limer at Gizmodo. Forstall testified that he was not allowed to hire anyone outside the company to work on the iPhone, which was dubbed Project Purple. He had to find "superstars" within Apple, and even they had no idea what the project was before they accepted his offer to work on it. "We're starting another project," Forstall said he would tell potential recruits. "It's so secret I cannot tell you what the project is. You are going to give up nights and weekends for a couple years."


2. The first rule of iPhone is "You do not talk about iPhone."
Initially, Forstall and his team occupied a floor in one of Apple's buildings in Cupertino, Calif. When the team expanded to some 1,000 people, all reporting to Forstall, he took over an entire building and locked it down with badge readers and security cameras. "In some cases, even workers on the team would have to show their badges five or six times" to get into work, says Ina Fried at AllThingsD. Forstall hung a sign outside the main entrance that read "Fight Club," a reference to the Brad Pitt movie about an underground club of brawlers known for its catchphrase, "The first rule of Fight Club is, 'You do not talk about Fight Club.'"


3. The iPhone went through a lot of 3-D prototypes
Apple has submitted documents showing various iPhone prototypes, some of which featured "bulbous backsides and angled edges," says Sherr. When lawyers for Samsung asked how Apple determined the iPhone's final design, Apple designer Christopher Stringer said, "It was the most beautiful of our designs ... When we realized what we got, we knew." (Samsung's lawyers are trying to show that Apple took inspiration for its iPhone design from phones made by Samsung and other manufacturers, negating Apple's claim that Samsung had copied the iPhone. "I never directed anyone to go and copy anything from Samsung," Forstall testified. "We wanted to build something great ... so there was no reason to look at something they'd done.")


4. Apple considered a 7-inch iPad
An internal email between Apple executives show that in early 2011 the company was considering creating a 7-inch tablet, smaller than its current 9.7-inch iPad, citing the success of Samsung's Galaxy Tab 7. "I believe there will be a 7-inch market and we should do one," executive Eddy Cue wrote to Jobs. Prior to the iPhone, Apple had also considered building a car, since the "success of the iPod persuaded Apple that it could be more than a computer company," says Stephen Lawson at PCWorld


5. Apple uses focus groups, despite Steve Jobs' denials
Phil Schiller, Apple's marketing chief, says the company sought to cultivate a "lust factor" for the iPhone when it debuted in 2007. Apple's marketing campaign was built on the theory of "product as hero," in which the product's looks and functionality were the dominant themes. So far, Apple has spent $647 million on marketing for the iPhone, and $457 million for the iPad, which came out in 2010. Schiller also revealed that Apple relies on focus groups to create its products, which had been denied by Jobs, who wanted to create the impression that iPhones and iPads were designed in a kind of aesthetic vacuum. 


More from The Week:

106Comments
Aug 7, 2012 1:54PM
avatar
I'm using a Samsung Galaxy II, other than being rectangular, it has features that I prefer over my wife's Iphone.  The phone is larger than the Iphone, so I can read the screen more easitly.  Next, I can swap batteries if I need to.  2nd, I can install mini_SD cards in it, and 3rd I have access to the Android market place.  I have no beef against Apple products, however, I hope they loose the farm during this lawsuit.  Their attempts to stifle the compettion and restrict user choice by bludgeoning their competitors out of the market with lawsuits have really drawn my ire.
Aug 7, 2012 1:34PM
avatar
Who cares? Apple is just the smug, arrogant yuppie of the electronics world & only too happy & quick on the trigger to pounce on anyone able to snatch a few dollars away from them. I hope they lose their shirts on this one... They deserve it!
avatar

How does revealing any of these hurt Apple?

 

Apple considered a 7-inch iPad? So what

 

Apple uses focus groups? Duh.

 

They wanted to build a car?

 

The headline said, "A court case is forcing Apple to divulge its closest secrets..."     How are these their closest secrets? This is just garbage.

Aug 7, 2012 1:25PM
avatar
Maybe for once the consumer will come out a winner on this battle.
Aug 7, 2012 1:45PM
avatar
I don't see anything secret here...  ??
Aug 7, 2012 3:05PM
avatar
Does Apple remind anyone else of an extremist communist governement?
Aug 7, 2012 1:47PM
avatar
I would say something about Apple, but I bet I would get sued as well! Maybe if you guys were not the biggest tech jerk out there, I would think of supporting your company. Until then @ Apple = Fail
Aug 7, 2012 1:40PM
avatar
If Apple considered building a car, they should sue Hyundai as well. 
Aug 7, 2012 3:32PM
avatar
Yes, Jobs was a genius in the way he developed Apple. I saw him several times at Apple meetings.  I also saw the "dark side" of Apple Corporate, when I owned an Apple Dealership from 1984 - 1990. Of course that was when IIe's were the rage, and the "newest innovation", the Macintosh Mouse and object oriented screens were introduced .... and then Bill Gates got a great idea ... "Windows". Of course, iPhones, iPads, and such were just science fiction back then. I just wish that all the jobs making Apple products today were putting Americans to work. By building it all in China, we're basically doing all the innovating here, and simply giving the technology to the Chinese so they can build the products, with what amounts to slave labor, in their factories.
Aug 7, 2012 2:38PM
avatar

Talk about the most arrogant company in the world.

Apple: "We are the only company with enough vision to see that people like tiny computers that are phones too."

"And we are the only company, minus every other tech company, to acknowledge that people want something that is easy to use."

I am in awe of their visionary ideas. s/

Aug 7, 2012 2:26PM
avatar
Forget Apple, it is only a staus symbol among the rich.  I have used their products and really don't care for them.  Especially the I Phone.  Apple is not the only brains in the world,
avatar
Excuse me .... I own the patent for the rectangle.   See design patent D457,540    Pay up Apple
Aug 7, 2012 1:46PM
avatar
funny world, in that the success of 3 products(ipod, iphone, ipad)  can make a company the biggest tech giant.
Aug 7, 2012 3:33PM
avatar
Apple products may be decent (decent, not great), but their arrogance, exorbitant prices and now this attempt to monopolize takes away all of that.

I'm surprised they didn't yet claim that they invented everything.
Aug 7, 2012 3:02PM
avatar
6. steve jobs was a freaking oddball.    oh wait thats no secret
Aug 7, 2012 2:19PM
avatar
Whether or not you support Apple, it is still an American company. Samsung is not.
Aug 7, 2012 1:56PM
avatar
If you like the idea of knowingly supporting Chinese sweat shops where people are treated like animals, go ahead and buy Apple products.
Aug 7, 2012 3:42PM
avatar

Apple used focus groups to work on one product.. Who'd of thunk it

Apple used security to keep their secrets. So how did  Samsung get their info?  What a  load cf  BS from Apple.

I asked my Gallaxy iii if it was stolen from an APPLE  design.. It said it didn't understand the question.

Aug 7, 2012 12:51PM
Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

RELATED ARTICLES

DATA PROVIDERS

Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.

Japanese stock price data provided by Nomura Research Institute Ltd.; quotes delayed 20 minutes. Canadian fund data provided by CANNEX Financial Exchanges Ltd.

ABOUT TECHBIZ

Start investing in technology companies with help from financial writers and experts who know the industry best. Learn what to look for in a technology company to make the right investment decisions.

RECENT POSTS

Yahoo's bold -- and expensive -- deal for Tumblr

Taking over the popular blogging platform is a smart idea, but with a price tag of $1.1 billion it's a huge gamble for CEO Marissa Mayer.

VIDEO ON MSN MONEY

RECENT QUOTES

WATCHLIST

Symbol
Last
Change
Shares
Quotes delayed at least 15 min

MSN MONEY'S