How to prepare your portfolio for rising interest rates
Increasing yields can bring both risk and reward for these stocks, but that doesn't mean you have to miss out on earning consistent dividends.
As interest rates collapsed in the past few years to multi-decade lows, investors had no choice but to flee low-yielding government bonds and bank CDs for higher-yielding, dividend-paying stocks. From master limited partnerships (MLPs) and real estate investment trusts (REITs) to foreign government bonds, it's been an era of profitable investing.
Yet signs are emerging that this trend may start to reverse course.
The yield on the 10-year Treasury note has spiked higher since the beginning of May to roughly 2.2%, and if we continue to see robust monthly employment reports, then these rates will probably climb steadily higher as the year progresses.
Simply put, the economy is getting healthier. Even given the likelihood that the Federal Reserve will keep its benchmark interest rates quite low for a few more years, the longer-term bonds, which are influenced by economic trends, have begun to anticipate a broader upturn.
So are the MLPs, REITs and other dividend payers likely to suffer if investors start to see attractive yields in the safety of government bonds and bank CDs? Not necessarily. But you need a keen understanding of the factors behind the rate changes, as they will bring disparate effects to different types of asset classes.
Before digging deeper, understand that the yield on the 10-year Treasury is likely to rise at a slow pace, and it could be a year or more before that figure moves past the 3% mark. The only concern is that the Fed's massive pump priming (known as quantitative easing or QE) is so unprecedented that we don't know how bond prices will react when the Fed starts to wind down the program. It could lead to a bit of chaos, which the bond market hates. Still, as long as the 10-year Treasury remains below 3%, it's premature to get too alarmed about the recent rate rise.
The cost of money
Putting aside for a moment the question of relative yields between bonds and stocks, you should be more concerned about which companies will be hurt or helped by rising rates. We've already seen potential losers in the group of mortgage REITs such as Two Harbors Investment (TWO) and Annaly Capital (NLY), both of which have fallen more than 10% in the past three months. These firms take advantage of low borrowing rates and garner profitable spreads by reinvesting their funds into higher-yielding mortgage-backed securities.
Traditional REITs, many of which deploy debt leverage to boost returns (or at least on properties that carry variable interest rate debt), are also falling out of favor right now. In just the past four weeks, a number of REITs have fallen more than 10%, including:
DHI), for example, have slid 10% in the past month.)
Higher rates will be felt most heavily by companies that carry variable rate debt, though you need to research and find out whether a specific company's floating rate debt is tied to LIBOR, which is likely to stay low for a while longer, or high-interest credit lines that are more closely aligned with 10-year bond rates. Rising variable interest rates will start to lead to lower earnings for highly leveraged companies.
Conversely, any companies that have suffered from low returns on their cash are bound to benefit. Charles Schwab (SCHW) for example, has made few profits on its money market funds or on the cash balances it holds for clients. Rising rates would help boost Schwab's core earnings power.
In a similar vein, insurance companies will also soon start earning more money on their hefty cash balances. I looked at this group a few weeks ago and noted that what had been a big headwind, pushing their shares below book value, could soon become a tailwind.
Risks to consider: The yield on the 10-year Treasury has spiked higher in a short time on several occasions in the past, so you may want to see yields pushing above 2.5% -- a level not seen in nearly two years -- before making major portfolio moves. Still, this is a good time to think about the steps you'll take in such a transition.
Action to take: The long bull market in bonds that began in the early 1980s appears to be winding down. Although dividend-paying stocks of all stripes have benefited, it's time to separate the field into winners and losers by looking at how interest rates affect each of these investments' earnings. Any company that uses very low interest rates to juice profits has probably seen a peak in profits, and smaller dividends may be looming ahead.
Add in the fact that rising fixed-income rates lessen the appeal of riskier stocks, and a tide may be turning. Still, it will be quite some time before fixed income investments offer the 4% or 5% yields that many crave.
More From StreetAuthority
- Should You Buy The Market's Most Controversial Stock?
- 'Bernanke-Proof' Your Portfolio With These Dividend Growers
- The Biggest Companies That Don't Pay Dividends -- But May Be About To
StreetAuthority LLC owns shares of NLY, TWO in one or more of its "real money" portfolios.
Ok, I don't plan to play with bonds anytime soon. But if I were how would this author suggest I do it? He gave no real advice. For me buying bonds even if rates rise 50% from this level would be foolish. I believe the Fed money printing guarantees higher interest rates and higher rates mean the value of bonds go down. Why would I buy into that? And Obama's economy-wealth-prosperity killing 20 trillion on its way to 25 trillion dollar debt will also drive rates higher as the world tires of taking on more and more risk and as they see U.S. inflation they will demand even higher rates.
I can not see owing bonds for perhaps the next ten years as we see how the Obama disaster unfolds.
We now modify our core investing strategies based on what we think the government will do next.
A sad time indeed.
Stocks are a pretty good hedge against inflation. If Coke sells a 12 oz drink for 50 cents and makes a nickel on it, and then we have 100 % inflation, then it will sell the same drink for 100 cents and make a dime. All else being equal, ie the PE ratio staying the same, the price of the stock doubles. Of course the reality is that you have gained nothing as the buying power of the value of your stock has remained the same. And of course if you sell, Uncle Sam will take a cut of your BOGUS gain. (This is why capital gains should be indexed to inflation and exactly why they never will be). Really this is the exact same logic used to owe gold as a hedge against inflation, and you still have to pay taxes on gold gains. One big difference is the INSANE commissions you have to pay on gold purchases and sales.
Back to stocks. Of course not all stocks will have complete pricing power to offset inflation, but most have to come pretty close. Secondly, a high inflationary economy ususally has slower economic growth and this can be a drag on stocks and a drag on their ability to completely offset inflation. All said and done stocks are a petty good hedge against inflation and should over a long term do better than gold. Obviously, fear has driven gold to preform very well, but long term their is no mechanism to drive gold to outperform inflation and stocks benefit from growth on top of inflation pricing. Bonds going forward from here will just be death to your economic health.
Curious will they finally raise the interest rate in banks saving accounts???
It is getting old having bankers use our funds for loans while only giving a half a penny back in interest!!!!!
The inflation rate is already rising. The government (Republicans, Democrats and Obama) is in denial of this fact. Just like in 2008 when the government kept denying a recession had begun, until the economy completely to hell.
I feel sorry for whom ever the next President is, democrat or republican. They will be stuck with high inflation, out of control spending and budget cuts that Obama refuses to make.
You will get killed! If your 30 year munis pay you 3.5% or 4%, ask a broker what that bond will be worth in 5 years when similar bonds are paying you 6%. Your $100,000 bond portfolio will be worth about $60,000. I could do the math , but that is a guess. Even if the number were $80,000, does that sound like a plan?
If you must go fixed income, go short term bonds. You might only get 1.5% but when interests return to 5% you can buy bonds then .... maybe.
My 5 year CD just matured and was paying 4.75% This money was in my SAFE bucket of invest ments.. There is a five year CD paying 1.5% with only 2months early withdrawal penalty. There are zero couple bonds paying 3.6% for 6 year term. Then there are fixed annuities paying 3.2% for 10 years. Wish I knew when and how much interest rates might rise. Back in 2010 I was sure rates were going up. I am 65 and this money is in my lower 1/3 bucket of safe investments. Don't need the money to live on cause my retirement income pays the bills with cola adjustments. Got to make a move soon.
This is typical. The Democrats make a big mess and then the Republicans have to clean it up and take the heat for doing the right thing. Obama knows that he can pile on 10 or 12 trillion in debt and the wheels will not fall off his bus or the economy until he is out of office. The sht will hit the fan, as you say, in the next administration. Typical, Carter guts the military, and Reagan came in fixed it and buried the Soviet Union. Clinton comes in, increases domestic spending, guts the military again using Reagan's "peace dividend". Obama continues to gut the military and we are now unable to fight a two front war. What will come of that will not be good and Republicans will have to fix it, and take the heat for the spending. The Democrats even know this is true, but it fits their agenda, expand the Welfare state at the expense of security, and then let the Republicans take the heat for fixing that problem, all the while the Democrats pocket the expansion of the state.
Take missle defense. Reagan started it. The Democrats have attempted to defund it at every turn. Obama guts the program in Europe. And then when N. Korea acts up, the Democrats take credit for being able to deploy missle defenses in the Pacific. Typcial. And on and on and on.
So once again, the Democrats maintain and expend Socialism with Debt, and Debt, and Debt. And they know there will be hell to pay on someone else's watch. And they know the American people are too stupid to look at cause and affect, and to look in the rearview mirror. And they know that it will be impossible to turn back their socialist expansion. So Republicans will get the blame for Obama's disaster.
"Be a Delusional Psychopath" or a Broke beggar living under the bridge, in a box....
Is this really a Choice I have to make today??
MLPs, LPs,Trust and even REITS(when favoable conditions exist) are pretty good bets on high dividend returns...Different type taxing conditions...
Get good advice, do your research, and maybe consult a tax advisor.
"The Democrats make a big mess, and then the Republicans have to clean it up"
That's takes a lot of balls to make a broad brush statement of that sort.
Better CHECK....the Facts and Logic, nary get labeled a lunatic.
BTW...We really shouldn't be fighting any Wars, unless beneficial to all Americans..These are not.
For you guys/gals contemplating or about to retire...
Number one thing of "Importance.".....Are you ready to retire ?? It's a different life, first of all.
The one waiting for/or at about 65, you are gaining every month on what you can draw on SS.
Both of you should realize and will, how much money you will be saving by retiring...
Make a list, add it up. Providing you do not have any "major debt" such as Mortage,CCs or New cars.
Figure in all forms of income, that you might be recieving(including any windfalls, Estates, etc.).
We retired several years before 62, then took SS as soon as possible; We don't regret it.
Putting safe back ups into long term low payers, I never considered. Usually about 6-13 months.
Maybe up to 3 years on a good rate...Exception: Locked in maybe longer terms on monies for kids, g-kids on an IRA or CDs; Being left to them.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
Fed keeps important 'considerable time' language in reference to short-term interest rates, but dissents and dots leave doubts.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.
Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.
Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.