Beware the PEG ratio

These 3 companies demonstrate how this simple tool is far from perfect.

By Aug 28, 2013 10:53AM

Stocks circled in newspaper (© Digital Vision/Getty Images)By Todd Bunton

The PEG ratio is a simple tool that can be useful in your search for undervalued stocks. But it is far from a perfect metric and is no substitute for doing your own homework.

Before we examine its shortcomings, let's first explore what it is.

PEG ratio defined

The PEG ratio takes the basic price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio one step further by factoring in earnings growth. In short, companies with faster earnings growth warrant higher P/E ratios.

This metric was first popularized by Peter Lynch and is calculated as price-to-earnings-to-growth rate.

According to Lynch, a company that's fairly priced will have a P/E ratio equal to its growth rate. In other words, a stock with a PEG ratio of 1.0 is fairly valued, while a stock with a PEG ratio of less than 1.0 is undervalued, and a stock with a PEG ratio greater than 1.0 would be overvalued.

No magic bullet

While this seems intriguing and intuitive, remember it is only a rule of thumb. The assertion that a P/E ratio should equal earnings growth is somewhat arbitrary and certainly does not apply to all companies.

Consider a blue chip company operating in a mature industry. Its earnings growth may only be 5%. Does that mean it should have a P/E ratio of 5? What if it pays a huge dividend? What about a company with no growth ... or even negative growth?

The intrinsic value of a business is the total of all its free cash flow available to owners discounted to the present value. This, of course, can be extremely difficult to calculate with any accuracy. So the PEG ratio is simply a proxy for it, and nothing more.

There is also no consensus on whether to use a trailing or a forward P/E ratio and whether to use next year's expected growth rate or a longer-term expected growth rate. But this can have a major impact on the PEG ratio calculation.

Beware those 5-year growth rates

I would argue for using a forward P/E since the stock market is forward looking, along with a longer-term earnings growth rate to keep a long-term perspective. However, use the long-term earnings number only with a great deal of caution. That is because the long-term earnings growth rates that analysts publish are often way too optimistic.

A study by J. Randall Woolridge and Patrick Cusatis of Penn State showed that analysts consistently project earnings per share growth rates much higher than actual growth, and that companies rarely meet or exceed their projected earnings per share growth rates. In fact, over a period of more than 20 years, Woolridge and Cusatis found that analysts' long-term earnings per share growth forecasts averaged +14.7%, but companies actual long-term earnings per share growth averaged only +9.1% -- almost 40% lower.

The study also found that analysts almost never forecast negative long-term earnings per share growth, although it happens quite frequently.

So, do your own homework, and make sure those growth rates seem reasonable because many bad investment decisions have been made based on off-the-wall earnings growth projections.

3 Deceiving PEG Ratios

So what are some deceptively attractive PEG ratios out there right now? Here are 3:

Apollo Group (APOL)

PEG Ratio: 0.6

5-yr projected EPS growth: 10.5%

Apollo Group owns several for-profit educational institutions, including the University of Phoenix. A PEG ratio of 0.6 looks very attractive at first glance. However, if you look a little closer, enrollment, revenue, profit margins and earnings have all been moving in one direction for Apollo: down. In fact, based on current consensus estimates, analysts project a 20% decline in earnings for Apollo this year and a whopping 38% decline next year. It seems very unlikely that the company can get to 10.5% average earnings per share growth from there in just a couple of years.

Cirrus Logic (CRUS)

PEG Ratio: 0.6

5-yr projected EPS growth: 16.9%

Cirrus Logic develops high-precision analog and digital signal processing components for consumer entertainment electronics, including smartphones. A high tech company with a PEG ratio of 0.6 might sound alluring, but based on current consensus estimates, analysts project a 32% drop in earnings this year and a 30% drop next year. The company would have to right the ship very quickly to see anywhere near 16.9% average earnings per share growth over the next 5 years.

Vale (VALE)

PEG Ratio: 0.4

5-yr projected EPS growth: 20.4%

Vale is a metals and mining company headquartered in Brazil. A PEG ratio of 0.4 might be tempting, but investors will probably be wise to ignore its siren call. Based on current consensus estimates, analysts project a 5% drop in earnings for 2013 and a 12% drop in 2014. And those estimates have been declining for several months. It's very unlikely that Vale can compound its earnings at an average of more than 20% from here when earnings are expected to decline this year and next.

The bottom line

The PEG ratio can be a useful rule of thumb for finding undervalued securities. But it should only be a starting place in that search. Don't blindly rely on those published five year growth rates and do your own homework!

Todd Bunton is the Growth & Income Stock Strategist for Zacks Investment Research and Editor of the Income Plus Investor service.

More from

Aug 28, 2013 11:34AM
"The study also found that analysts almost never forecast negative long-term earnings per share growth, although it happens quite frequently."

Just another of the myriad reasons all ****-ysts should never be trusted, as company and personal self interest always trumps the truth with  those bought and paid for sell outs.

Re: PEG............ PEG is a starting place, yes, but do avoid any stocks with a PEG under .50....way too much risk in almost all cases.
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?


Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.


StockScouter rates stocks from 1 to 10, with 10 being the best, using a system of advanced mathematics to determine a stock's expected risk and return. Ratings are displayed on a bell curve, meaning there will be fewer ratings of 1 and 10 and far more of 4 through 7.

124 rated 1
266 rated 2
452 rated 3
702 rated 4
671 rated 5
604 rated 6
640 rated 7
495 rated 8
267 rated 9
158 rated 10

Top Picks




Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.

Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.

Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.