When $11 billion is cheap
JPMorgan could catch a break if authorities agree.
In what world would an $11 billion settlement be cheap? How about in the
world of banking?
If JPMorgan Chase (JPM) can actually get the federal and state authorities to sign a piece of paper saying they can only sue them for future infractions in the mortgage market and not past ones, then JPMorgan will have gotten a huge bargain. It could be fabulous for the bank.
The reason? Two words: Normalized earnings. That's right. If we could see what JPM could earn excluding all of these cases, then we could build a model. If we could build a model we might be able to find out what JPMorgan's worth on an earnings basis. Until then, we are stuck in some world where we don't know what this bank, the envy of the industry, can really earn. Right now the Street is clustered at around $6 in earnings power for next year.
But what would you pay for that stream? What would you pay for that stream if you knew it came attached to a buyback of some size? What would you pay for it if you knew that it contained several dividend hikes, hikes that were decided upon by the bank's board itself? What could that be worth? How about a 10 multiple? Eleven? Maybe even a 12? How about in a rising-rate environment, one where the 10-year Treasury goes to 4%, adding about $4 billion to the bottom line? How about where you take out the possible $4 billion in legal costs that JPMorgan might end up paying annually as this insanity of nationwide court battles drags on?
That $11 billion dollar price tag is dirt cheap when you consider all of the positives that could come out after the payment, especially when you know that JPMorgan has a fortress ATM machine that can spit out fortress dollars to pay Fort Knox.
Now it's tough to come up with a figure. The number has to be substantial enough to allow the Justice Department and all of the states involved to call it a victory and the people actually believe that it is a victory because the sum is so large. But it can't be so large that JPM says, wait, let's take our chances with all of these authorities and go to court.
It also has to be ironclad. BP (BP) is still being crushed and obliterated by its deal with the Justice Department that BP thought got it off the hook for damages but, in retrospect, got them nothing at all. JPMorgan needs a deal that is so clean, that is so preemptive that you can't ever expect the Justice Department or a State Attorney General to file suit on old mortgages again.
Do you think the authorities will go for that? Do you think they will say "OK, so maybe we haven't found everything they have done wrong, but we can risk that we have and let them off for all but future violations?" In that sense this would be like the global tobacco settlement where the tobacco companies mortgaged their future with the suing authorities to stay alive and in the end prospered. I am sure the critics of the banks will say this is a get-out-of-jail-free card and that Jamie Dimon has to go as part of it.
That's not going to happen either.
Nor does it matter that many of these mortgages that are faulty came from Washington Mutual and from Bear Stearns and not originally JPMorgan. That's a total abstraction. We are way past the fault-no-fault stage.
So, JPM shareholders, don't freak out at the size. It is a fraction of what Bank of America's (BAC) been on the hook for. But don't rejoice yet, either. There are a lot of entities that want executive scalps as part of any deal. And a lot of others who don't want to hold JPMorgan harmless for any future infractions that were rooted in the dark past.
Call it fluid. But in the end call it certainty and certainty leads to a higher, not a lower, multiple.
Jim Cramer is a co-founder of TheStreet and contributes daily market commentary to the financial news network's sites. Follow his trades for Action Alerts PLUS, which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust and is long JPM.
More from TheStreet.com
Corporate officers must be punished and the protections offered by corporate law must be changed. If an individual commits a crime against society they must be punished. As well when a corporation commits a crime the officials must pay as well. No more standing behind corporate law. This activity is nothing less than organized crime. A 16 year old black kid steals a televison he goes to jail. A rich white guy in a suit steals 500 million through corporate safety they are fined 100 million. Total BS.
I've always said, if the penalty for robbing a bank was a $1000, I'd be robbing banks all day, every day.
It's really sad that Cramer thinks this $11 billion fine is a great thing.
And how about your part in the countrywide scam cramer ? Remember how you shilled for mozilla on y our show as he was busy stealing hundreds of millions from the American taxpayer.
$11 billion is a chump change slap on the wrist for the "too big to fail" gang of thieves.
so therefore it will happen
I guess Anthony Mirhaydari is Leaving MSN reports...
I kind of liked and enjoyed his columns...
Also what happened to the "NOW" format on the home page...??
Veteran Lender has a way of creating mental images with words. Amazing really!
Well folks, Barry has joined us with his name calling and words of wisdom.Do you know the difference
between a super market and the stock market yet?Barry thinks Jimmy Buffett and Warren Buffett
are the same guy.
"WASHINGTON (AP) - Speaker John Boehner says House Republicans will not accept the temporary funding bill being considered by the Senate.
Boehner told reporters Thursday, quote, "I don't see that happening." Boehner, however, refused to say how the House would change it.
The Senate is expected to pass a bill this weekend that would fund the government beyond Monday, the last day of the budget year. House Republicans previously passed a bill to fund the government that also stripped funding for President Barack Obama's health care law.
The Senate is expected to remove the health care provisions from the bill and make other changes. Boehner said House Republicans want to avoid a partial government shutdown. But to do that, the House and Senate must agree on a bill by Tuesday."
When a few stubborn career politicians can stall and stagnate an entire nation over points best described as "lobby demands"... then it is time to haul lobbies out into the daylight and have the nation pulverize them. 90 million recovered careers with family-sustaining wages or the end of GOP in America. Go ahead John Boehner... throw THAT threat out to the House and see who still stands there collecting salary for Treason and Terrorism.
Barry, let me refresh your memory.Obama got Bin Laden.Your buddy Bush was rewriting
history back in Texas then.
EVIL CHRIS:We don`t want to mention that Clinton put100,000 fully funded cops on the streets.
Peace and prosperity with Dems is boring.We want wars,hate,bad education and sacrifice.Where`s
Dick Cheney when we need him?
4loveofmoney;IKE built the interstate highway system in the 50`s.Now the Repubs can
mention all the great things the Dems have done.I have a bridge to sell also.LOL.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
Most people hate the idea, according to a recent poll. But the government is inching closer to allowing airlines to make the final decision.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.
Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.
Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.