Investors say no to executive buyout perks

Shareholders are pressuring companies to curb golden parachutes. But, legally speaking, their votes don't mean much.

By MSN Money Partner Jun 6, 2014 1:57PM
Credit: © dmcmurdie/Getty Images

Caption: A businessman floating on a golden parachute, holding bags of moneyBy Liz Hoffman, The Wall Street Journal

Golden parachutes are encountering a stiff wind.

Shareholders at four companies have voted in recent weeks to prevent executives from cashing in on certain stock bonuses if their companies are sold, the latest sign that investors are pushing back on the generous pay packages in the event of a merger or sale.

The nonbinding votes at oil refiner Valero Energy (VLO), media company Gannett (GCI), commercial landlord Boston Properties (BXP) and Dean Foods (DF) come as shareholders have pressured companies to curb severance perks over the past few years, experts say. Regulators, too, have forced companies to disclose more about these payouts.

"The golden age of golden parachutes is over," said Regina Olshan, a Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP lawyer who advises companies on executive pay.

Golden parachutes are falling out of favor amid investor and regulatory scrutiny of rising executive pay, especially perks that aren't tied to a company's performance. Those concerns can be heightened during merger-and-acquisition deals, when executives can pocket years' worth of stock grants, options, salary and bonuses all at once.

Defenders of golden parachutes say they can create value for investors. Chief executives of acquired companies often expect to lose their jobs after a merger closes. If they know they will be compensated, they might be less likely to stand in the way of a deal that would pay shareholders a premium. 

"You want to get to the point where management, from a personal financial standpoint, is indifferent" about a deal getting done, said George Paulin, CEO of Frederic W. Cook & Co., an executive-compensation consulting firm.

Since 2011, shareholders have had a say in how much executives are paid, including golden-parachute payments. "Say on pay" votes are now required by the Securities and Exchange Commission. While they aren't binding, boards are under pressure from regulators and shareholder-advisory firms to consider investor views when crafting executive-pay packages.

As a result, "we're certainly seeing a more conservative approach by companies" to change-of-control payments, said Dan Wetzel, a managing director at consulting firm Pearl Meyer & Partners.

Cash severance payments, which once commonly exceeded three times an executive's annual salary and bonus, have been trimmed, experts said. Other perks have all but disappeared. One such example are gross-ups, which obligate a company to pay the high taxes levied on corporate perks, in effect letting the executive take home the full amount. Just seven of the 50 largest U.S. companies allowed tax gross-ups in 2012, down from 21 companies in 2006, according to Pearl Meyer. Mr. Wetzel said the number is likely lower now.

In recent months, mall company Taubman Centers (TC), auto-parts supplier Lear Corp. (LEA) and others have removed gross-ups from their arrangements with senior executives, regulatory filings show.

Mel Stephens, Lear's head of investor relations, said the company's board believed removing the gross-ups "was in shareholders' best interests."

Shareholders have also driven a shift to golden parachutes that only compensate executives who are fired after a merger, rather than agreements that pay out even if the executives keep their jobs. "The appearance of double-dipping" irked some investors, Mr. Paulin said.

Shareholders now appear to be ratcheting up the pressure against a perk that persists: stock awards. Companies often grant top executives shares that vest, or become available, at a future date, and often only if the company hits certain performance goals.

But in an M&A deal, these shares can vest automatically when a deal closes, even if the executive keeps his or her job. That is the case at 44 percent of Russell 3000 companies, according to proxy adviser Institutional Shareholder Services Inc.

For example, Matthew Shattock, CEO of liquor producer Beam Inc., received about $20.9 million from previously unvested stock options and awards in the company's sale to Suntory Holdings Ltd., according to a regulatory filing. Mr. Shattock remains CEO of Beam, which was renamed Beam Suntory Inc. after the sale to Japan's Suntory closed in April. 

C. Larry Pope, CEO of Smithfield Foods Inc., received about $18 million from similar perks that were cashed out when the pork producer was sold to a Chinese company last year. Mr. Pope is still the CEO of Smithfield, now a subsidiary of WH Group Ltd. Beam and WH Group declined to comment.

The proposals at Valero, Gannett, Boston Properties and Dean Foods, submitted by organized-labor groups, would prevent unvested stock awards tied to future performance from automatically vesting in a merger. They each received a majority of votes cast but aren't binding on the companies.

Valero, Boston Properties and Dean Foods declined to comment. Gannett didn't respond to a request for comment.

Amalgamated Bank, the union-owned bank that sponsored the Valero ballot measure, has submitted at least 10 similar measures at other companies since 2010, according to regulatory filings. But none has passed until this year, said Scott Zdrazil, the bank's head of corporate governance. Similar proposals have failed at other companies this year, including Honeywell International (HON) and Avon Products (AVP). 

"We're not opposed to some sort of severance, but we are concerned about the size of the cherry on top of the cake," Mr. Zdrazil said.

More from The Wall Street Journal

Jun 6, 2014 2:10PM

""Since 2011, shareholders have had a say in how much executives are paid,...... While they aren't binding........""


~ that says it all.  we have no say


excessive CEO pay, and high payouts upon their firing, is theft of our 410K money

Jun 7, 2014 10:22AM
these packages are awarded by the directors...look at the insider trading for any company...directors are "awarded" hudreds of  millions of $ each qtr for their "work"...which is rubber stamping the ceo's outrageous pay
Jun 7, 2014 6:47AM
If shareholders REALLY had balls, they would sue any executive propping up a selfish money grub and drive the shallow bastard to ruin. Maybe we can get some 1% cannibalism going and flush the cancer out of America. 
Jun 7, 2014 10:18AM
Say on pay votes  you talkin to me?"   or we hear you but you do not matter...
Jun 8, 2014 10:58AM
This comment "Defenders of golden parachutes say they can create value for investors.  of acquired companies often expect to lose their jobs after a merger closes. If they know they will be compensated, they might be less likely to stand in the way of a deal that would pay shareholders a premium".  , proves that CEO's don't have the shareholders best interests in mind but rather a little ego and inflated self worth.
Jun 8, 2014 11:52AM

There  are a few, but probably hard to name many....; CEOs that have the Shareholder's best interest at heart....??

If and when they do, it is quite beneficial to them, their families and close friends, that are investors also...And many times is expressed in how their EMPLOYEES are treated too...

Kind of there within, is "the proof in the pudding."

And most of them have long tenure or are Founders/ close founder related.

Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?


Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.


StockScouter rates stocks from 1 to 10, with 10 being the best, using a system of advanced mathematics to determine a stock's expected risk and return. Ratings are displayed on a bell curve, meaning there will be fewer ratings of 1 and 10 and far more of 4 through 7.

124 rated 1
266 rated 2
452 rated 3
702 rated 4
671 rated 5
604 rated 6
640 rated 7
495 rated 8
267 rated 9
158 rated 10

Top Picks




Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.

Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.

Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.