Moto X might not be the hero Google needs
The just-launched, US-made smartphone could kick-start a new era for a former market leader . . . or push it deeper into trouble.
In 2011, Google pledged to pay about $12.5 billion to buy Motorola, thus joining the ranks of smartphone manufacturers. The company has had little success in this category so far, despite the domination of its Android OS in the global smartphone market.
Motorola Mobility has been bleeding money and losing employees since becoming part of Google in the spring of 2012.
Motorola Mobility has been consistently reducing its global presence, dropping one market after another (TheGuardian), and giving up control of its manufacturing plants. But even these moves didn't help the company remain afloat on its home turf. Its Droid line didn't seem to strike the fancy of American customers, and shipments declined quarter after quarter.
Moto X might be the savior the company desperately needs. Promoted under a "Made in the U.S." banner, the device will be "the first smartphone designed, engineered, and assembled in the USA," as the company puts it.
Motorola Mobility CEO Dennis Woodside said that 70% of the devices will be assembled in a Fort Worth, Tex., factory run by Motorola's manufacturing partner Flextronics (FLEX), a global contract electronics maker headquartered in Singapore (allthingsd).
But will the appeal to patriotism and an enormous $500 million marketing budget prompt consumers to pay $199 on contract for the device? Except for its slim and sleek design and signature curvy back, Moto X doesn't offer much in the way of special features; it is hardly worthy of a gadget-to-die-for label.
Moto X features a 4.7-inch AMOLED 720p display and 10 megapixel main camera, and it uses Motorola's X8 set of chips. It essentially combines a couple of different processors "under the one hood," but most of its power comes from Qualcomm's (QCOM) Snapdragon S4 Pro running at 1.7 GHz, which is similar to the processors used in the updated Nexus 7 tablet and the Droid smartphones Motorola announced in July.
Moto X comes in two versions, with 16GB or 32GB of storage that's not expandable (two years of free 50GB on Google Drive is included as bonus). The promised battery life is up to 24 hours.
While the hardware itself is solid, it's far from being impressive. A number of similar or faster devices are already on the market, including Samsung's (SSNLF) heavyweight Galaxy S4.
As for its software, Moto X runs Android 4.2.2 and offers Active Display updates (important notifications appear on the screen even if the device is not fully powered), Touchless Control (the phone is always "listening" for voice commands), and an improved camera application.
The personalization options look promising, to say at least: Users can customize the color on the front and back of the phone and will have thousands of shades to choose from. The company is also working on a back made of wood. Customers can also choose the type of edges the phone will have and the color of the volume buttons, and they can still have the phone delivered within the US for free in four days or less. However, whether customization options will have an impact on sales is uncertain.
Moreover, pressure from the upcoming Apple (AAPL) iPhones -- not to mention current Android flagships from Samsung, Sony (SNE), and HTC -- might seriously hurt Moto X sales, which begin in late August in the U.S.
So could a single "Made in the U.S." phone model save the ailing company and bring Google something more than just a boost to its patent portfolio and poor financials? At least Motorola has already saved its own reputation with the RAZR line-up, first released about a decade ago, and Moto X looks like a sound attempt at a comeback, anyway.
More from Minyanville
Google owns Motorolla,.....and has a strong interest in republic wireless,...Republic wireless needs more phone options,...could this generate enough base to justify the phone while making $$ on the national cell providers,.... .just saying,.......
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Bill Stiritz owns more than 5% of the company, and has experienced an estimated $145 million in paper losses on his investment.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.
Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.
Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.