Murdoch fires first salvo in media mergers
The bid for Time Warner may not go through, but it's an indication that the industry is ripe for consolidation.
It's "part of the digital disruption" of the industry, he said in a "Squawk Box" interview.
"Even though content is normally king, the new age of the Googles, the Amazons, the Apples, the Netflixes all suggest that you have to be very entrepreneurial," Levin continued, "and most importantly, try and redefine your company."
"It's ultimately all about management," he added. "The ability to manage a combination. It's not just about blue-chip assets. That's another lesson from AOL-Time Warner."
Larry Haverty, associate portfolio manager of Gabelli Multimedia Trust, told CNBC a deal of this magnitude is like "two elephants playing in the jungle."
"This is basically the first salvo in a wave of media consolidation," said Haverty, following the news of Rupert Murdoch's overture.
In order to address antitrust issues, 21st Century Fox said it would sell CNN, sources told CNBC, so Fox News Channel and CNN would not be under the same umbrella.
"The industry is ripe for consolidation," he said. "I doubt there would be antitrust considerations."
"I don't think that it's happening is a surprise, but the fact that it is happening in this scale in Time Warner, which has been a very high-performing company, [is]. "It's made our clients tens of millions of dollars," Haverty said.
"We thought internally that things would happen in this sector," he said -- adding a 21st Century Fox offer for Time Warner was not "exactly what we thought."
Mario Gabelli, the billionaire value investor, tweeted his thoughts, saying Time Warner is in play.
Murdoch is said to be "determined" to buy Time Warner, despite the board's rejection. If this deal were to happen, it would not only have implications in cable TV but also in sports and movies.
"Time Warner doesn't have a broadcast network. And they have one of the most prolific, successful TV studios in the world. So if you marry the Time Warner TV studio with the Fox broadcast network, you kind of own the entire value chain," said David Bank, media analyst and managing director at RBC Capital Markets.
"The content cost synergies, you're negotiating across a massive portfolio of channels. And you're going to probably get better pricing there," he said.
Tony Wible, media analyst at Janney Capital Markets, told CNBC: "It's way under-paying for the value that Time Warner brings to the table."
"You think about this tie-up here. You bring 21st Century content to HBO, Fox ends up getting sports content. You get [retransmission fees] leverage to really improve the economics around Turner Network and other core cable networks," he said.
More from CNBC
Boy, lots of Saul Alinsky types on here today. They obviously read his book Rules for Radicals and have they ever been duped.
Evil is in the hands of the liberal media. or is it the other way around.
Have you noticed how MSN feels sorry for the Palatines.. And ignore that Hamas is who to blame for all of this.
It is said that in the last days all will turn against the Jews,
I have a solution and I'm asking for others to join in with ideas and answers, spread the word and lets get started and please no needless garbage unless you have a better idea:
The wealthy in the media will hate this, The population of America is roughly 307,000,000. Start there, then identify the number of taxpayers and develop a plan to construct our own, tax payer paid and controlled media. We find out how many Satellites would be needed to cover America, including daily operations. That is our cost
Next, we offer all media broadcasters, both airwave and cable to "Uplink" to OUR satellites. Instead of the Digital Broadcast TV, we go back to the 18" Dish as our antenna to receive the signals. They can get their revenue through advertising but scale back the ridicules massive amount that are shown today (typical daytime 1 hour show = 40 to 55 commercials per hour). There are so many you forget what you're watching, not to mention the mental issues that comes with that many unnecessary changes.
Go back to the 18" Dish. Have "American" companies build a simple small dish system that becomes the new TV antenna system. No coding, no monthly fees, just TV. All the cable market people like HBO, Showtime and others can join in if they want but they would have to change to a new commercial venue. Maybe they can incorporate the commercial into the program or run them before or after a show. I'm sure that can be developed. We have just created a new industry in America and most important, JOBS. Build, Buy, Sell and service the dish.
If you go camping, you can take your system with you, if you move, same thing. It's now a small and simple system and you only pay for the equipment. The satellite system, compared to the hundreds in orbit could be managed by the Air Force, they already do that, so adding a few more "Birds" won't be a big deal plus they could charge the media providers for bringing them on board.
We as taxpayers pay for the system and pay to maintain it, we're already paying for wars, other countries and those getting rich off us but "we" would control this. If someone wants to join, follow "our" rules.
The cost spread out among tax payers would be minimal to non existent compared to cable and satellite fees. A simple solution to a serious treat to our wallets. This is simple and yes lobbyist for the media groups will be kissing major politicians booties to stop it but isn't it about time politicians start doing their job which is looking out for our interests and not their financial handlers?
We can do it people, we can do it. For once, lets stand together, pass this idea around, talk about it, send letters to the slugs in Washington and tell them for once, think about us!.
Wait...so that means all of you who post about how he only lets one side of politics run rampant on his network don't know what they are talking about?
If you need any more proof that politics is a fixed game where both sides are playing us Rupert Murdoch is it. He has happily been profiting off the hatred both sides spew towards each other...no wonder it keep on marching on
In the end, we the consumers who make these people wealthy will just keep paying more and get less. There is no end in site and horrible when you see cable bills higher that the electric bill to run the entire house.
We are screwed and its going to get worse. I watch the entire Comcast merger dealings on CSpan and it was sickening. All they talked about was corporate profits, edging out competition and that consumers will only pay more and have less options.
It's amazon Fox is owned by an Australian and a Saudi National. Their network spends it waking hours blasting the President and spreading lies. Harvard and Yale have made it clear to their students, do not use Fox as a reference.
It doesn't matter if you like Obama or not, the fact that two non-Americans ream us for money, talk about our country and want more at our expense. Leave the Mexicans here, send these fools and Justin Beiber home!
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
These companies won't soar like other plays in the sector, but they make for great income sources.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.
Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.
Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.