Restaurants continue to deliver

With many big gainers in the sector, is there any value out there?

By TheStreet Staff Sep 11, 2013 11:44AM

thestreet logo

Couple ordering meal in restaurant © NULL/CorbisBy Jonathan Heller

The restaurant freight train continues to roll. Historically, restaurant stocks have been one of the top performing sectors coming out of recessions, primarily due to two factors.

First, during recessions the supply of restaurants either contracts or does not grow, as weaker chains are forced to close and the healthier ones slow their growth. Once consumers regain their confidence, they typically eat out more often and it becomes a supply and demand issue.

But this time around, the outperformance seems to have continued long past the end of the recession (if it really did, in fact, end). This has occurred during a period of extended high unemployment numbers and the lowest labor force participation rates we've seen in decades.

Commodity cost inflation, which would force either higher menu prices or lower margins, has not yet reared its ugly head in a significant way, although I still believe it ultimately will. It appears that one of our greatest pastimes as a nation is eating outside the home -- good economy or bad.

As a result, restaurant stocks have been on fire again this year. Year to date, a basket of 39 restaurant stocks, with a minimum market cap of $100 million, are up an average of 39.2%, versus 19.8% for the S&P 500 ($INX), and 24.3% for the Russell 2000 ($TOMX), which is the better benchmark -- given that the average market cap for the basket is about $1.3 billion.

But valuations for the group appear to be getting stretched out, with an average price-to-earnings ratio just above 30 and price-to-book ratio at 4. That's not to say restaurant stocks are on the verge of a meltdown, but they certainly are not cheap, and would likely get hit hard if the economic "recovery" (if you can call it that) loses steam, and/or if we see food costs rise substantially. These names would also likely be hit harder than the broad markets if we see a market pullback.

The biggest winner year to date is fast-casual name Fiesta Restaurant Group (FRGI), which went public in 2012 and operates Pollo Tropical and Taco Cabana restaurants in six states, primarily Texas and Florida. Last month, the company opened its 100th company-owned location.

Other big gainers include Krispy Kreme (KKD) (+110%), Red Robin Gourmet Burgers (RRGB) (+92%), Wendy's (WEN) (+77%), Famous Dave's (DAVE) (+76%), Ruth's Hospitality Group (RUTH) (+67%), Chuy's (CHUY) (+66%), and AFC Enterprises (AFCE)(+64%).

As a value investor, I'm interested in the losers, the names that investors are shunning. Just two names have negative returns year to date: BJ's Restaurants (BJRI) (-4%), and Ruby Tuesday (RT) (-4%).

Ruby Tuesday, a name I've owned previously, has taken a 24% haircut in the past two months, primarily due to worse-than-expected fourth-quarter numbers. Consensus estimates were calling for earnings per share of 19 cents, but the company delivered 12 cents. Revenue of $316.1 million was less than the $331 million consensus.

After nearly imploding back in 2009, Ruby Tuesday has taken strides to right the ship. The balance sheet is much improved, and total debt has been reduced from $493 million at the end of 2009, to $299 million at the end of last quarter. The company has also altered its menu and is under new leadership. Whether that will ultimately translate into a better bottom line remains to be seen.

I'm attracted to the name because the company owns the land and buildings for 324 locations, and the buildings only for another 265. That's a compelling real estate portfolio for a company that has an enterprise value of just $700 million. Furthermore, the stock trades at just 0.86 times tangible book value.

ruby tuesdayWe'll see whether new management and a new menu can help deliver some better operating results.


At the time of publication, the author held no positions in any of the stocks mentioned.


More from

Sep 11, 2013 11:01PM
It's somewhat unusual for a "value investor" to report only the 2013 results except for one loser.  What about those with very steady gains for a decade of more whose value can be more reliably determined?
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?


Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.


StockScouter rates stocks from 1 to 10, with 10 being the best, using a system of advanced mathematics to determine a stock's expected risk and return. Ratings are displayed on a bell curve, meaning there will be fewer ratings of 1 and 10 and far more of 4 through 7.

123 rated 1
266 rated 2
485 rated 3
660 rated 4
586 rated 5
652 rated 6
640 rated 7
504 rated 8
289 rated 9
159 rated 10

Top Picks

TAT&T Inc9



Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.

Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.

Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.