Silicon Valley cafeterias whet appetite of IRS

Those free employee meals are great perks, but they're also taxable, the agency says.

By MSN Money Partner Sep 2, 2014 3:10PM
Credit: © Ted S. Warren/AP

Caption: The breakfast bar at in the employee cafeteria of Google Inc.'s campus in Kirkland, WashBy Mark Maremont, The Wall Street Journal

There is a grumpy new face in line at Silicon Valley's lavish freebie cafeterias: the Internal Revenue Service.

Staffers at technology companies such as Google (GOOG), Facebook (FB) and Twitter (TWTR) long have enjoyed free gourmet meals, courtesy of their employers. The groaning buffets, in-house pizza joints, and kitchens stocked with organic produce are an intrinsic part of the culture in much of Silicon Valley, encouraging both collaboration and longer work hours.

The IRS, arguing that these freebies are a taxable fringe benefit, has given new attention to the issue in recent months during routine audits of some companies, tax lawyers said. When employers haven't been withholding taxes related to the meals, the IRS increasingly has sought back taxes that can amount to 30 percent of the meals' fair-market value, the lawyers said.

In another sign of a new focus on the issue, the IRS and U.S. Treasury Department last week included taxation of "employer-provided meals" in their annual list of top tax priorities for the fiscal year ending next June. The agencies said they intend to issue new "guidance" on the matter, but gave no specifics about timing or what the guidance would say.

"I suspect this is going to be guidance on these free cafeterias, that the benefit has got to be included in income," said Anne G. Batter, an employment-tax attorney at Baker & McKenzie in Washington.

An IRS spokesman declined to comment.

Tax lawyers expect some employers will fight the IRS over the matter, and said the issue is likely to be decided in the courts. Any broad IRS crackdown could spur complaints about petty government interference with the culture of a crucial industry.

But allowing free meals to go untaxed, critics say, distorts the economy and gives some employers an unfair edge.

In theory, individual employees could be dunned for back taxes on the free meals. In practice, the IRS generally tries to collect from employers, who are liable for failing to withhold taxes on any taxable income.

Google, Facebook and Twitter -- three companies known for their food perks -- declined to comment.

IRS interest in the free-meals issue ticked up last year, after The Wall Street Journal published an article focusing on whether the food should be considered a taxable benefit, said Thomas M. Cryan Jr. , a Washington employment-tax attorney at Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC.

"It's definitely an area the IRS is auditing," said Mr. Cryan, who said two of his clients are in the midst of IRS audits over this matter.

Mr. Cryan said he has been told by IRS agents that the meals-tax push stems from a national directive by senior officials.

In general, tax experts said, employer-provided meals -- beyond those served at the occasional business meeting -- are a taxable fringe benefit, similar to personal use of a company car or the value of employer-paid life-insurance coverage above the IRS threshold of $50,000.

But it is a complex area of tax law, and there are exceptions. For example, meals can remain untaxed if they are served for a "noncompensatory" reason for the "convenience of the employer."

The exception generally applies to workers in remote locations, such as oil rigs, or in professions where reasonable lunch breaks aren't feasible. A Las Vegas casino won in court over the issue by arguing that stringent security made it impractical for employees to eat outside the premises.

Some lawyers argue that, in many cases, corporate free-meal programs fit under the "convenience of the employer" test.

"Look at the time savings," said Mary B. Hevener, an employee-benefits attorney at Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP in Washington.

"If your employees are able to eat lunch and get back to their desks in 20 or 30 minutes, that's a big time savings," she added. "The food is a lot healthier in many cases. And maybe you don't want your employees running around in other eateries talking business."

Ms. Hevener wouldn't discuss her clients, but said "examining agents are not fairly assessing what the regulations and legislation say" in this area.

Even if tax-free meals eventually go away, that won't necessarily spell the demise of Silicon Valley's no-cost buffets. Marianna Dyson, an attorney at Miller & Chevalier in Washington, said she knows of at least one Silicon Valley company that provides free food, but "grosses up" its employees, paying them extra to cover additional taxes owed on the perk.

More from The Wall Street Journal

Sep 2, 2014 8:30PM
I would like to know how many IRS employees get free meals, more or less regularly, due to the "strenuous workload" at that agency.  

An audit of this practice at all IRS centers might be quite revealing and would be the first place to start cracking down on the practice, if that is their intent.
Sep 2, 2014 11:07PM
Put Lois Lerner on the case.  If these silicon valley companies donate to Democrats, they can break all the laws they want to and IRS won't care

F'ing money grab, just ANOTHER government money grab.

Sometimes it seems like they are daring us to engage in active armed revolt.

Not that my company would EVER provide a benefit like that, but still, the IRS is gonna flub up another primo company trying to **** rape them for more money.

Sep 2, 2014 6:39PM

"The agencies said they intend to issue new "guidance" on the matter, but gave no specifics about timing or what the guidance would say." - Maybe they'll be honest this time (referencing the 401 roll-over blow-up a few months back), and just put in their guidance: "It doesn't matter what we print here, even though it is an IRS issued announcement - we will do whatever we want to get more of your money".

Going further, it looks like a typical law full of gibberish like using the word "convenience" in an exception.  In other words - "get an army of lawyers, take us to court, and all us slimes in ties will laugh all the way to the bank".

Gotta laugh and cry for this country at the same time.......

Sep 2, 2014 5:03PM
Of course, these aren't for the outsourced service workers that labor there.
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?


Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.


StockScouter rates stocks from 1 to 10, with 10 being the best, using a system of advanced mathematics to determine a stock's expected risk and return. Ratings are displayed on a bell curve, meaning there will be fewer ratings of 1 and 10 and far more of 4 through 7.

123 rated 1
262 rated 2
480 rated 3
651 rated 4
649 rated 5
629 rated 6
616 rated 7
496 rated 8
346 rated 9
111 rated 10

Top Picks

TAT&T Inc9



Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.

Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.

Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.