The Fed is always on Wall Street's mind

What the rally on Summers’ withdrawal says about market psychology.

By Jim J. Jubak Sep 16, 2013 9:51PM

Image: Trading floor (© Corbis)A losing team changes coaches and suddenly starts to win. A company replaces its CEO and its stock suddenly moves up. Lawrence Summers withdraws his name from consideration to replace Ben Bernanke as chairman of the Federal Reserve in January and global financial markets rally.

The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index ($SPX) ended the day up 0.57%. The German DAX closed up 1.22% Monday and Hong Kong’s Hang Seng finished up 1.47%. The 10-year U.S. Treasury traded to yield 2.86%.

There’s certainly an element of personal judgment in these moves. Summers has a reputation for intellectual brilliance and arrogance that led to well-reasoned worries that he would not be able to build consensus at the Fed.

But mostly the markets’ move upwards is relief that someone who had come, rightly or wrongly, to embody the possibility that the Fed would move aggressively to "normalize" its balance sheet and interest rates, won’t be in charge of the U.S. central bank.

Summers worried global financial markets -- not just because he might have moved more quickly to end the Fed’s buying of Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities than Bernanke would have if he had remained in charge of the Fed, but also because he might have pushed to raise short-term interest rates, now at 0% to 0.25%, to something like a more normal 1%.

Global financial markets may not like the idea that the Fed is about to start tapering off its buying program. But the markets are really, really afraid that the Fed won’t hold short-term rates at their current extraordinarily low levels until 2015, as it has promised.

The take-away lesson from the markets’ reaction to the Summers withdrawal is how close to the surface the markets’ worry about an early Fed tightening is. The real threat to the markets, this reaction says, is not Wednesday’s Fed decision to taper/not to taper but an easy tip in market psychology into worry about tightening -- even on very little or no objective evidence that the Fed is about to move in that direction any time soon.

Full disclosure: I don’t own shares of any of the companies mentioned in this post in my personal portfolio. When in 2010 I started the mutual fund I manage, Jubak Global Equity Fund, I liquidated all my individual stock holdings and put the money into the fund. The fund did not own shares of any company mentioned in this post as of the end of June. For a complete list of the fund’s holdings as of the end of June see the fund’s portfolio.


MSN Money on Twitter and Facebook

Like us on Facebook: MSN Money and Top Stocks

Follow us on Twitter: @msn_money and @topstocksmsn

Sep 17, 2013 8:46AM
FED watching is like keeping your smart phone in bed with you.  Like give these FED cats the back seat where they should be.  Money changers are not the stars of this or any economy.  They create no value.  They detract a percentage of everything much like an entitlement Tax.  They actually are but a minor player in this huge economy but almost like folk lore they are given the head seat at the table.  Stop and think just how goofy this FED watching is.  These cats have horned their way into the mainstream investment community and act like rock stars or celebrities.  These are bean counters and anyone who would let a bean counter run their business is headed for disaster.   Imagination and innovation by a public employee is just about an oxymoronic endeavor.  Think they don't want and like being in the spotlight?  So they create reason and accept mission creep to stay in the public eye.  This is just way too goofy.  Financing and credit should be seen as minor happenings in a productive imaginative capitalistic market.  Just one of the nuts and bolts of product development.  So being this dependant on the money men and keeping them in the political forefront is not a healthy function in my opinion.  We need real stars that actually create value, not these support function robots.
Sep 17, 2013 7:41AM
We need someone like Scott McNealy as president, fed chief, or treasurer.  He understands economics.  He would make the hard decisions to pull us out of this mess.  He is a grown up.  We would not worry so much if we had him in office.  He knows what to do, how to ex plain it and how to calm the fears that have us paralyzed.
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?


Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.


StockScouter rates stocks from 1 to 10, with 10 being the best, using a system of advanced mathematics to determine a stock's expected risk and return. Ratings are displayed on a bell curve, meaning there will be fewer ratings of 1 and 10 and far more of 4 through 7.

123 rated 1
262 rated 2
480 rated 3
651 rated 4
649 rated 5
629 rated 6
616 rated 7
496 rated 8
346 rated 9
111 rated 10

Top Picks

TAT&T Inc9



Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.

Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.

Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.