The Federal Open Market Committee can surprise again
The Street is very sanguine, and that is a red flag.
By Thomas H. Kee Jr.
One might have argued that the September meeting of the Federal Reserve's Federal Open Market Committee was one of the most surprising and important in quite a while.
Prior to the meeting the committee actually did lay out the requisites for tapering, but the Street just did not pay attention. Instead, Wall Street imposed a bias that the committee ignored, and therefore we should expect the committee to continue to ignore the bias of Wall Street.
If that is true, prudently, we must look at what prevented the committee from tapering last time.
Of course the front and center data point is the employment data, which not only was delayed as a result of the government shutdown, but it also came in lighter than the expectations of analysts on the Street. This is absolutely important data, but the committee never said that it needed to see strong data. It just wanted to see a stable trend, and that is why the trend was not a focal point at the September meeting. Terminology was definitely used suggesting that the committee wait for additional data to taper, but the trend of the employment data was absolutely not a rationale for not tapering.
In fact, my observations based on BLS-supplied data suggests that the trend in employment has been solid, trending higher even though it may be at a more moderate pace than some would like, and that is what the committee has wanted to see. The rationale for not tapering in September came from something else, and it is that we must respect going into this next meeting.
Specifically, the culprit was interest rates. The rate on the 10-year note had spiked going into the meeting, it was pressing 3%, and they had been one-sided up (bonds were declining) since early May. There was no pause, rates were surging going into the meeting, and the committee governors made it clear that they did not like the level of interest rates and could not justify tapering given where interest rates were and the trajectory of interest rates accordingly. Piggy-backing on the already higher rate environment was not supported by the governors.
However, since then the trajectory of interest rates has changed, and the 10-year note is closer to 2.4% than 3%, so there is a nice gap and ample wiggle room now, things that did not exist in the September meeting. This is a green light to raise rates, but now there is the government shutdown to contend with. The question is, will they think the shutdown will have had long-lasting impact.
Clearly, investors do not believe so, and although some data may come in choppy, I doubt the committee thinks the shutdown will have long-lasting impact. If that is true, and they focus more on the recent trajectory of employment (steadily higher although at a moderate pace) and the level of interest rates, things that they have said before are important, we just could see a taper in a couple days.
I know this would surprise everyone, but almost everyone got it wrong last time too. They even suckered me into changing my tone right before the meeting, because I was calling for no tapering up until the final few days when I became convinced by the Street. Today I am again of the notion that the committee actually has enough to taper again, and this time rates are not bumping up against 3%.
The rationale for not tapering in September definitely was the level of interest rates, the committee minutes prove it, and I think the Street again is overlooking what the committee has said. They are transferring their all-clear bias on equities to favorable committee decisions and fueling the rally, but the Street was wrong last time, they can be wrong this time, and if the committee discounts the impact of the shutdown like the Street is doing they will be left with a positive trajectory in employment and lower interest rates than last time, two things they have focused on and talked about as leading catalysts to taper.
Our eyes are on the ProShares UltraShort Lehman 20+ year Treasury ETF (TBT), and we believe TBT may soon become a good buy, but it is not quite there yet.
Stock Traders Daily provides proactive trading strategies that are capable of working in both up and down market environments. Strategies that invest in the stock market involve high degrees of risk, and anyone deciding to make trading decisions should first consult with their financial advisor.
More on Top Stocks
If there is another QE it will cause the bears to do their usual crying"the market is only going
up because of Fed money".Translation:They missed the bull market and now they`re bitter.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
Firearms sales surged in 2013, but there are signs that demand is starting to wane.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.
Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.
Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.