The time to rotate into mega-cap stocks is now
Micro- and small-caps have been the big winners in this bull market, but a slower future growth would belong to these overlooked giants.
In the summer of 1990, the U.S. economy was quickly losing altitude. By the fourth quarter, the nation's GDP had fallen by nearly 4%. Unemployment began to rise, and the economic weakness would eventually cost George H.W. Bush a chance for a second term.
By Oct. 1 of that year, the Russell 2000 small-cap index had fallen to just 119. Yet just 16 months later, it surged past the 200 mark, reaching 250 by September 1993. Investors shouldn't have been surprised. Small-cap stocks always do well when the economy is in a funk, but investors sense that better days lie ahead.
Well, it's happening again.
Although the U.S. economy has posted a halting and unimpressive recovery, investors have again embraced seemingly risky small caps. The 200% gain in the Russell 2000 since the markets bottomed out in March 2009 surpasses the S&P 500's ($INX) gain by a whopping 50 percentage points.
Yet for a host of factors, it's time to trim your exposure to small caps and go big. Mega-cap stocks, which are the 100 largest companies in the S&P 500, haven't held this much appeal -- relative to small-cap stocks -- in quite some time.
Analysts at BMO Capital Markets took a look this issue in a historical context and concluded that "Although mega-cap stocks have traditionally underperformed during the first few years of bull markets, the degree of underperformance in the current cycle is quite exceptional." They add that "this is typically the part of the (economic) cycle where mega-cap outperformance begins."
Before we delve into the reasons why mega-cap stocks should soon rotate into favor, it's helpful to know why they traditionally underperform in the early stages of economic recoveries. The simplest explanation: Small-cap companies tend to feel the painful effects of an economic recession more deeply (as was the case in the early part of 1990), and as a result, have the potential for the most robust earnings rebound as the economy stabilizes.
Mega-cap stocks, on the other hand, don't typically suffer from severe profit droughts when the economy slows, and are instead like ocean liners steaming ahead at a constant pace in all cycles.
In fact, that relative dullness can work against mega-cap stocks when markets are moving higher at a rapid clip. "These stocks have a reputation of being the most predictable and thus least interesting area of the market (e.g., the perception that better performance opportunities exist elsewhere)," noted BMO's analysts.
Perhaps the greatest appeal of mega-caps right now is the relative valuations. The recent phase of underperformance has left many of them with price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios below the S&P 500 average of 16.
And these relatively low P/E ratios have two implications. First, these stocks are likely to be spared from indiscriminate selling if investors look to shed pricey stocks in a falling market. And they have more room for multiple expansions if the market moves higher.
The foreign factor
Mega-cap stocks have also underperformed because they have relatively greater exposure to global markets. Though it's hard to pinpoint the specific numbers for mega-caps, the typical company in the S&P 500 derives roughly 46% of sales from abroad, which is roughly twice the level of small caps. And much of the foreign sales are derived from European affiliates.
Yet at some point, perhaps as soon as the next few quarters, the European drag will abate, and soon thereafter become a tailwind as European spending (especially in terms of capital equipment) starts to make up for lost time.
The United States: safety and upside
Of course, these mega-caps still derive the bulk of their sales in the U.S., the world's largest economy. Though economic growth has been underwhelming thus far in 2013 (expanding 1.1% in the first quarter and 1.7% in the second quarter), most economists anticipate a steady strengthening led by consumer spending. If they're right, a firmer economy will enable these mega-caps to generate decent (albeit unspectacular) growth in sales and profits in coming years.
But what if the economists are wrong and the U.S. economy starts to sputter? (Bespoke Investment Research notes that two straight quarters of sub-2% GDP growth yields a 70% chance of a recession in the next 12 months as the economy hits "stall speed"). Well, mega-caps are the place to be in such a scenario. BMO's analysts found that the return on equity of mega-caps "never dipped below 15% throughout the entire financial crisis." That's a claim the small caps can't make.
Bulletproof balance sheets
One of the hallmarks of the recent era is the stunning rise in cash balances at almost every major U.S. corporation. By one estimate, mega-caps' cash balances now account for 16% of their total asset base. That figure is below 10% for the bottom 400 companies in the S&P 500. Equally important, the global rivals to these mega-caps have not had the luxury of building up such robust cash balances. And greater financial strength should allow domestic mega-caps to go on the offensive and pursue global market share as the global economy mends.
I'm partial to a few mega-caps in particular, starting with AIG (AIG), which I profiled a few weeks ago (StreetAuthority).
The insurer just announced its first dividend since the global crisis took root, and by math, the payout should rise smartly in coming years.
I also remain a huge fan of both Ford (F) and GM (GM), which I also profiled recently (StreetAuthority).
If you prefer to go the exchange-traded fund (ETF) route, then the iShares S&P 100 Index (OEF) is a solid choice. Vanguard gives investors two ways to invest in the theme: the Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index ETF (MGK) and the Vanguard Mega Cap Value Index ETF (MGV). The latter fund may hold greater appeal, not just because it has lagged the major indices over the past five years, but also because "large-cap value stocks (low price/book) have outpaced their growth counterparts by roughly 2% annualized, from 1927 through 2012," according to Morningstar.
Risks to consider: Mega-caps may remain out of favor if investors continue to favor higher-beta assets that are perceived as bull market winners.
Action to take: The seemingly never-ending surge for this bull market has a whiff of mania about it -- yet at some point, the current momentum investing trend will peter out. When that happens, investors are likely to take note of the relative value and safety that mega-caps offer.
StreetAuthority LLC does not hold positions in any securities mentioned in this article.
More from StreetAuthority
Confidential sources close to Conservative Report have confirmed that Valerie Jarrett was the key decision-maker for the administration, the night of the Benghazi terrorist attack on 9/11/2012.
The chronology of the evening of 9/11 are as follows:
At approximately 5 PM Washington time, reports came in through secure-channels that Special Mission Benghazi was under attack. Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey summoned the President,and briefed him on the crisis, face to face.
Subsequent to that brief meeting, President Obama proceeded to the White House to dine in his living quarters.
After supper, Barack Obama had a telephone conference scheduled with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu... As that meeting drew to a close, Ms. Jarrett, who is also the Assistant to the President for Public Engagement and Intergovernmental Affairs, went from the living quarters to the White House Situation Room, where the attack in Benghazi was being monitored by Dempsey, Panetta and other top-ranking officials.
Whether she was instructed by the President to go there, or if she went of her own volition, is only known by the President and herself.
A critical question that needed to be answered, and the sole military-order that could have launched offensive-actions, neutralizing the Ansar al Sharia terrorists attacks on the Mission (the purpose of which are detailed ) and its subsequent attacks on the adjacent CIA Annex, was the issuance of “Cross Border Authority”, an order that can only be issued by the Commander in Chief himself.
, Cross Border Authority was denied... Two revelations are deeply troubling:
First, it is reported that an Army Special Forces team was present with an AC-130U Spooky (also known as a Spectre Gunship) on the tarmac at the airport in Tripoli, Libya. The Spooky is a technologically sophisticated, tactical aircraft, operated by the U.S. Air Force Special... The AC-130U Spooky is equipped with weapons that sync with laser-designators, like those that Woods, Doherty and Ubben had on that above the CIA Annex. The laser-designator was used to “paint” the mortar targets during the attack, subsequently claiming the lives of Woods and Doherty, and leaving Ubben without a leg. Had the AC-130U been on station, over the CIA Annex in Benghazi, moments before the mortar rounds were fired, instead of "awaiting further instructions," the entire outcome of the Benghazi fiasco would have been different.
Add to that, a team of Green Berets on the ground to secure and/or evacuate the Annex, and the outcome would have been two SEALS still alive, and a mess of dead terrorists.
The second, and most troubling aspect of the refusal to issue Cross Border Authority is who issued the refusal. Rather than the President, the Commander In Chief, making , granting or denying the authority to initiate offensive-actions in support of our valiant fighting men, the decision not to take action was made by a person, to whom the people did not elect, nor did the Congress have confirmation power over.
The military-order, not to initiate action, saving our men in Benghazi, was issued by the President's Advisor, Valerie Jarrett.
And this is a “phony” scandal?
Attempting to time the market by speculating which securities, sectors, or asset classes will rise is bad for one's financial health. The higher risk asset classes (i.e, small cap, small value) will always outperform large cap and large growth - but over time. That's why they call it risk.
Classic Lady;I had a Pinto when I was 19 and in college.It wasn`t a HONEYWAGON.However,
I did get lucky in it a few times.If there`s a will,there`s a way.
EMPTYCHAIR = MORON NOUN what moron left ice cream on the stove? fool, idiot, ****, blockhead, dunce, dolt,ignoramus, imbecile, cretin, dullard, simpleton, clod; informal nitwit,halfwit, dope, ninny, nincompoop, chump, dimwit, dingbat, dipstick,goober, coot, goon, dumbo, dummy, ditz, dumdum, fathead, numbskull,numbnuts, dunderhead, thickhead, airhead, flake, lamebrain, zombie,nerd , peabrain, birdbrain, jughead, jerk, donkey, twit, goat, dork, twerp,schmuck, bozo, boob, turkey, schlep, chowderhead, dumbhead,goofball, goof, goofus, galoot, lummox, klutz, putz, schlemiel, sap,meatball, dumb cluck. ANTONYMS genius. THEY ALSO HAD A PHOTO,, I THINK IT WAS YOU,,,,OUR HOST DOES NOT PERMIT PHOTO'S
Good job moron when to stupid to answer the question just pull your thumb out of your a$$ and point it downwards.
Racists supreme !!
LMFAO @ U Regal
HMM - A racist darkie who would've thunk it !
"Former President George W. Bush underwent a procedure Tuesday morning to have a stent placed in an artery after a blockage was discovered in an annual physical examination, according to his office.
The Daily Rundown's Chuck Todd reports that former President George W. Bush had a stent placed in his heart after a blockage was found during his annual exam. The procedure was conducted at Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital. According to a statement, the blockage was discovered..."
... to be remnants of the pretzel that almost did him in. The things dismal leaders will do to get back into the public eye are amazing.
MORE ON MSN MONEY
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
The Fed may start tapering in just a few months. Here are a few of the likely winners and losers.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.
Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.
Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.