This is no time to bet against Yahoo's CEO

With all that Mayer has done in the past year, you have to think she'll figure this one out, too.

By Jim Cramer Jul 17, 2013 9:33AM

thestreet logoIt's easy right now to get disillusioned with Yahoo (YHOO). The last thing you ever want to hear from a company is that numbers have to be taken down. But it sure isn't for lack of trying.

 

CEO Marissa Mayer has done an amazing job in one year's work. She inherited a company with terrible morale -- a company that was way off course and losing market share and relevancy to Google (GOOG) and Facebook (FB).


But she had one thing going for her: the balance sheet. It was pristine. It was better than that, actually. It was brimming with cash.

Pretty much everything, though, was going the wrong way. In a world where tech and the Internet are precisely at the point when the word "obsolete" has turned into its most violent and disruptive form of verb, Yahoo was about to be "obsoleted."

 

So, if the company had to guide down, what's so amazing about what Mayer has done? I think it is threefold:

 

1. She's turned around declining page views. Unless you have been in this game for a while, you have no idea how hard that is to do. She's doing it via improved content, including some expensive content -- more on that in a moment -- as well as tack-on, acquisitions and some improvement in the experience. This is the kind of improvement we are more used to seeing from her predecessor company, Google, than from this one.

 

2. For ages, Yahoo was infamous for losing any employees who were any good. She has brought down the attrition rate by 59%, and 12% of the people whom she has hired are "boomerangs" -- typically talented, disaffected people who want back in because they've heard good things about what Mayer is doing. That's even as we know she promulgated "no right to work" rules -- meaning you had to physically show up to keep your job. Yep, there were a lot of mail-it-inners at the company 366 days ago. There aren't anymore.

 

3. She drastically reoriented the company toward mobile. If you think Facebook didn't have a good mobile strategy a year ago, consider that Yahoo didn't even have many engineers associated with mobile. "Dozens" was the word she used. Now there are hundreds: a sixfold increase.

 

She did all of this without dinging the balance sheet at all on the way to shrinking the shares outstanding from 1.4 billion in 2009 to 1 billion today. She still has $4.8 billion in cash, and a lot more monetizable firepower behind it.


Marissa Mayer on NBC News' 'Today' show on Feb. 20, 2013 (© Peter Kramer/NBC/NBC NewsWire via Getty Images)But there was one line in the call -- actually one word in the call -- that created the hush and then brought on the sell: "programmatic." That's a method of allocating advertising dollars that has swept an industry with too much inventory, and it is sucking all of the margin out of display ads. Gone are the days in "journalism" -- if that's what you want to call a lot of content on Yahoo and other sites around the Web -- when there was a finite amount of copy against which to advertise. In a world where 250,000 blogs are started each day at Yahoo's Tumblr division -- in a world where content is not only not king but even pawn -- you need machines to figure out where to get your best eyeballs.

 

Wanting your ads placed to the right copy, and being willing to pay a premium for it, used to be the bedrock of journalism. That whole idea is now gone. Algorithms tell you where to place those ads. You don't do precision daylight bombing, either. You carpet bomb with machines. While you may end up bombing some places you don't need to reach, you get the job done at a much lower cost, and a much lower profit for those purveying the content.

 

So display ads were "challenged." What about the new page views? Yahoo has "yet to translate into revenue growth."

 

I don't know how it will. Because the money you get for advertising has to come from somewhere non-programmatic. It has to be somewhere that has truly proprietary non-replicable content. A good example is the "Saturday Night Live" deal that everyone was so gaga about on the on-call: old material that is proprietary enough that advertisers might like it.

 

How important is this to Yahoo? There is an incredible mismatch between a lack of video -- which you can still get good rates against -- and what the advertisers want from Yahoo. I think that might be the surest way to reverse this trend, but we can't be sure. With programmatic buying, who knows?

So, despite all of those good works, the stock is going down because its competitors, Google and Facebook, are ahead of Yahoo in trying to cover their flanks against this kind of buying. Google does it in search, while Facebook does it in novel ways to get eyeballs and a plethora of users, including mobile users -- double the number of overall eyeballs that Yahoo has.

 

Now here's the toughest part. You had to bet, with Mayer, that she would solve the basic problems of Yahoo when she took the job last year -- and she has done so. That's points one, two and three above, which she solved without really denting the cash hoard.

 

Now you have to bet with her that she'll solve the programmatic challenge and grow revenue. I was quite confident that she would fulfill miracles one, two and three.

 

I am not going to bet against her now. She has the smarts. She has the firepower.

 

She'll figure it out.

 

I get the profit-taking. But a big selloff? That means you should buy it, not sell it.

 

cramer

 

Jim Cramer is a co-founder of TheStreet and contributes daily market commentary to the financial news network's sites. Follow his trades for Action Alerts PLUS, which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust and is long FB.

 

 

  

More from TheStreet.com

52Comments
Jul 17, 2013 11:53AM
avatar

thestreet logoIt's easy right now to get disillusioned with Yahoo (YHOO). The last thing you ever want to hear from a company is that numbers have to be taken down. But it sure isn't for lack of trying.

 

CEO Marissa Mayer has done an amazing job in one year's work. She inherited a company with terrible morale -- a company that was way off course and losing market share and relevancy to Google (GOOG) and Facebook (FB).


But she had one thing going for her: the balance sheet. It was pristine. It was better than that, actually. It was brimming with cash.

Pretty much everything, though, was going the wrong way. In a world where tech and the Internet are precisely at the point when the word "obsolete" has turned into its most violent and disruptive form of verb, Yahoo was about to be "obsoleted."

 

So, if the company had to guide down, what's so amazing about what Mayer has done? I think it is threefold:

 

1. She's turned around declining page views. Unless you have been in this game for a while, you have no idea how hard that is to do. She's doing it via improved content, including some expensive content -- more on that in a moment -- as well as tack-on, acquisitions and some improvement in the experience. This is the kind of improvement we are more used to seeing from her predecessor company, Google, than from this one.

 

2. For ages, Yahoo was infamous for losing any employees who were any good. She has brought down the attrition rate by 59%, and 12% of the people whom she has hired are "boomerangs" -- typically talented, disaffected people who want back in because they've heard good things about what Mayer is doing. That's even as we know she promulgated "no right to work" rules -- meaning you had to physically show up to keep your job. Yep, there were a lot of mail-it-inners at the company 366 days ago. There aren't anymore.

 

3. She drastically reoriented the company toward mobile. If you think Facebook didn't have a good mobile strategy a year ago, consider that Yahoo didn't even have many engineers associated with mobile. "Dozens" was the word she used. Now there are hundreds: a sixfold increase.

 

She did all of this without dinging the balance sheet at all on the way to shrinking the shares outstanding from 1.4 billion in 2009 to 1 billion today. She still has $4.8 billion in cash, and a lot more monetizable firepower behind it.


Marissa Mayer on NBC News' 'Today' show on Feb. 20, 2013 (© Peter Kramer/NBC/NBC NewsWire via Getty Images)But there was one line in the call -- actually one word in the call -- that created the hush and then brought on the sell: "programmatic." That's a method of allocating advertising dollars that has swept an industry with too much inventory, and it is sucking all of the margin out of display ads. Gone are the days in "journalism" -- if that's what you want to call a lot of content on Yahoo and other sites around the Web -- when there was a finite amount of copy against which to advertise. In a world where 250,000 blogs are started each day at Yahoo's Tumblr division -- in a world where content is not only not king but even pawn -- you need machines to figure out where to get your best eyeballs.

 

Wanting your ads placed to the right copy, and being willing to pay a premium for it, used to be the bedrock of journalism. That whole idea is now gone. Algorithms tell you where to place those ads. You don't do precision daylight bombing, either. You carpet bomb with machines. While you may end up bombing some places you don't need to reach, you get the job done at a much lower cost, and a much lower profit for those purveying the content.

 

So display ads were "challenged." What about the new page views? Yahoo has "yet to translate into revenue growth."

 

I don't know how it will. Because the money you get for advertising has to come from somewhere non-programmatic. It has to be somewhere that has truly proprietary non-replicable content. A good example is the "Saturday Night Live" deal that everyone was so gaga about on the on-call: old material that is proprietary enough that advertisers might like it.

 

How important is this to Yahoo? There is an incredible mismatch between a lack of video -- which you can still get good rates against -- and what the advertisers want from Yahoo. I think that might be the surest way to reverse this trend, but we can't be sure. With programmatic buying, who knows?

So, despite all of those good works, the stock is going down because its competitors, Google and Facebook, are ahead of Yahoo in trying to cover their flanks against this kind of buying. Google does it in search, while Facebook does it in novel ways to get eyeballs and a plethora of users, including mobile users -- double the number of overall eyeballs that Yahoo has.

 

Now here's the toughest part. You had to bet, with Mayer, that she would solve the basic problems of Yahoo when she took the job last year -- and she has done so. That's points one, two and three above, which she solved without really denting the cash hoard.

 

Now you have to bet with her that she'll solve the programmatic challenge and grow revenue. I was quite confident that she would fulfill miracles one, two and three.

 

I am not going to bet against her now. She has the smarts. She has the firepower.

 

She'll figure it out.

 

I get the profit-taking. But a big selloff? That means you should buy it, not sell it.

 

cramer

 

Jim Cramer is a co-founder of TheStreet and contributes daily market commentary to the financial news network's sites. Follow his trades for Action Alerts PLUS, which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust and is long FB.

 

 

  

More from TheStreet.com

Jul 17, 2013 10:43AM
avatar

thestreet logoIt's easy right now to get disillusioned with Yahoo (YHOO). The last thing you ever want to hear from a company is that numbers have to be taken down. But it sure isn't for lack of trying.

 

CEO Marissa Mayer has done an amazing job in one year's work. She inherited a company with terrible morale -- a company that was way off course and losing market share and relevancy to Google (GOOG) and Facebook (FB).


But she had one thing going for her: the balance sheet. It was pristine. It was better than that, actually. It was brimming with cash.

Pretty much everything, though, was going the wrong way. In a world where tech and the Internet are precisely at the point when the word "obsolete" has turned into its most violent and disruptive form of verb, Yahoo was about to be "obsoleted."

 

So, if the company had to guide down, what's so amazing about what Mayer has done? I think it is threefold:

 

1. She's turned around declining page views. Unless you have been in this game for a while, you have no idea how hard that is to do. She's doing it via improved content, including some expensive content -- more on that in a moment -- as well as tack-on, acquisitions and some improvement in the experience. This is the kind of improvement we are more used to seeing from her predecessor company, Google, than from this one.

 

2. For ages, Yahoo was infamous for losing any employees who were any good. She has brought down the attrition rate by 59%, and 12% of the people whom she has hired are "boomerangs" -- typically talented, disaffected people who want back in because they've heard good things about what Mayer is doing. That's even as we know she promulgated "no right to work" rules -- meaning you had to physically show up to keep your job. Yep, there were a lot of mail-it-inners at the company 366 days ago. There aren't anymore.

 

3. She drastically reoriented the company toward mobile. If you think Facebook didn't have a good mobile strategy a year ago, consider that Yahoo didn't even have many engineers associated with mobile. "Dozens" was the word she used. Now there are hundreds: a sixfold increase.

 

She did all of this without dinging the balance sheet at all on the way to shrinking the shares outstanding from 1.4 billion in 2009 to 1 billion today. She still has $4.8 billion in cash, and a lot more monetizable firepower behind it.


Marissa Mayer on NBC News' 'Today' show on Feb. 20, 2013 (© Peter Kramer/NBC/NBC NewsWire via Getty Images)But there was one line in the call -- actually one word in the call -- that created the hush and then brought on the sell: "programmatic." That's a method of allocating advertising dollars that has swept an industry with too much inventory, and it is sucking all of the margin out of display ads. Gone are the days in "journalism" -- if that's what you want to call a lot of content on Yahoo and other sites around the Web -- when there was a finite amount of copy against which to advertise. In a world where 250,000 blogs are started each day at Yahoo's Tumblr division -- in a world where content is not only not king but even pawn -- you need machines to figure out where to get your best eyeballs.

 

Wanting your ads placed to the right copy, and being willing to pay a premium for it, used to be the bedrock of journalism. That whole idea is now gone. Algorithms tell you where to place those ads. You don't do precision daylight bombing, either. You carpet bomb with machines. While you may end up bombing some places you don't need to reach, you get the job done at a much lower cost, and a much lower profit for those purveying the content.

 

So display ads were "challenged." What about the new page views? Yahoo has "yet to translate into revenue growth."

 

I don't know how it will. Because the money you get for advertising has to come from somewhere non-programmatic. It has to be somewhere that has truly proprietary non-replicable content. A good example is the "Saturday Night Live" deal that everyone was so gaga about on the on-call: old material that is proprietary enough that advertisers might like it.

 

How important is this to Yahoo? There is an incredible mismatch between a lack of video -- which you can still get good rates against -- and what the advertisers want from Yahoo. I think that might be the surest way to reverse this trend, but we can't be sure. With programmatic buying, who knows?

So, despite all of those good works, the stock is going down because its competitors, Google and Facebook, are ahead of Yahoo in trying to cover their flanks against this kind of buying. Google does it in search, while Facebook does it in novel ways to get eyeballs and a plethora of users, including mobile users -- double the number of overall eyeballs that Yahoo has.

 

Now here's the toughest part. You had to bet, with Mayer, that she would solve the basic problems of Yahoo when she took the job last year -- and she has done so. That's points one, two and three above, which she solved without really denting the cash hoard.

 

Now you have to bet with her that she'll solve the programmatic challenge and grow revenue. I was quite confident that she would fulfill miracles one, two and three.

 

I am not going to bet against her now. She has the smarts. She has the firepower.

 

She'll figure it out.

 

I get the profit-taking. But a big selloff? That means you should buy it, not sell it.

 

cramer

 

Jim Cramer is a co-founder of TheStreet and contributes daily market commentary to the financial news network's sites. Follow his trades for Action Alerts PLUS, which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust and is long FB.

 

 

  

More from TheStreet.com

Jul 17, 2013 11:14AM
avatar

thestreet logoIt's easy right now to get disillusioned with Yahoo (YHOO). The last thing you ever want to hear from a company is that numbers have to be taken down. But it sure isn't for lack of trying.

 

CEO Marissa Mayer has done an amazing job in one year's work. She inherited a company with terrible morale -- a company that was way off course and losing market share and relevancy to Google (GOOG) and Facebook (FB).


But she had one thing going for her: the balance sheet. It was pristine. It was better than that, actually. It was brimming with cash.

Pretty much everything, though, was going the wrong way. In a world where tech and the Internet are precisely at the point when the word "obsolete" has turned into its most violent and disruptive form of verb, Yahoo was about to be "obsoleted."

 

So, if the company had to guide down, what's so amazing about what Mayer has done? I think it is threefold:

 

1. She's turned around declining page views. Unless you have been in this game for a while, you have no idea how hard that is to do. She's doing it via improved content, including some expensive content -- more on that in a moment -- as well as tack-on, acquisitions and some improvement in the experience. This is the kind of improvement we are more used to seeing from her predecessor company, Google, than from this one.

 

2. For ages, Yahoo was infamous for losing any employees who were any good. She has brought down the attrition rate by 59%, and 12% of the people whom she has hired are "boomerangs" -- typically talented, disaffected people who want back in because they've heard good things about what Mayer is doing. That's even as we know she promulgated "no right to work" rules -- meaning you had to physically show up to keep your job. Yep, there were a lot of mail-it-inners at the company 366 days ago. There aren't anymore.

 

3. She drastically reoriented the company toward mobile. If you think Facebook didn't have a good mobile strategy a year ago, consider that Yahoo didn't even have many engineers associated with mobile. "Dozens" was the word she used. Now there are hundreds: a sixfold increase.

 

She did all of this without dinging the balance sheet at all on the way to shrinking the shares outstanding from 1.4 billion in 2009 to 1 billion today. She still has $4.8 billion in cash, and a lot more monetizable firepower behind it.


Marissa Mayer on NBC News' 'Today' show on Feb. 20, 2013 (© Peter Kramer/NBC/NBC NewsWire via Getty Images)But there was one line in the call -- actually one word in the call -- that created the hush and then brought on the sell: "programmatic." That's a method of allocating advertising dollars that has swept an industry with too much inventory, and it is sucking all of the margin out of display ads. Gone are the days in "journalism" -- if that's what you want to call a lot of content on Yahoo and other sites around the Web -- when there was a finite amount of copy against which to advertise. In a world where 250,000 blogs are started each day at Yahoo's Tumblr division -- in a world where content is not only not king but even pawn -- you need machines to figure out where to get your best eyeballs.

 

Wanting your ads placed to the right copy, and being willing to pay a premium for it, used to be the bedrock of journalism. That whole idea is now gone. Algorithms tell you where to place those ads. You don't do precision daylight bombing, either. You carpet bomb with machines. While you may end up bombing some places you don't need to reach, you get the job done at a much lower cost, and a much lower profit for those purveying the content.

 

So display ads were "challenged." What about the new page views? Yahoo has "yet to translate into revenue growth."

 

I don't know how it will. Because the money you get for advertising has to come from somewhere non-programmatic. It has to be somewhere that has truly proprietary non-replicable content. A good example is the "Saturday Night Live" deal that everyone was so gaga about on the on-call: old material that is proprietary enough that advertisers might like it.

 

How important is this to Yahoo? There is an incredible mismatch between a lack of video -- which you can still get good rates against -- and what the advertisers want from Yahoo. I think that might be the surest way to reverse this trend, but we can't be sure. With programmatic buying, who knows?

So, despite all of those good works, the stock is going down because its competitors, Google and Facebook, are ahead of Yahoo in trying to cover their flanks against this kind of buying. Google does it in search, while Facebook does it in novel ways to get eyeballs and a plethora of users, including mobile users -- double the number of overall eyeballs that Yahoo has.

 

Now here's the toughest part. You had to bet, with Mayer, that she would solve the basic problems of Yahoo when she took the job last year -- and she has done so. That's points one, two and three above, which she solved without really denting the cash hoard.

 

Now you have to bet with her that she'll solve the programmatic challenge and grow revenue. I was quite confident that she would fulfill miracles one, two and three.

 

I am not going to bet against her now. She has the smarts. She has the firepower.

 

She'll figure it out.

 

I get the profit-taking. But a big selloff? That means you should buy it, not sell it.

 

cramer

 

Jim Cramer is a co-founder of TheStreet and contributes daily market commentary to the financial news network's sites. Follow his trades for Action Alerts PLUS, which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust and is long FB.

 

 

  

More from TheStreet.com

Jul 17, 2013 10:32AM
avatar

thestreet logoIt's easy right now to get disillusioned with Yahoo (YHOO). The last thing you ever want to hear from a company is that numbers have to be taken down. But it sure isn't for lack of trying.

 

CEO Marissa Mayer has done an amazing job in one year's work. She inherited a company with terrible morale -- a company that was way off course and losing market share and relevancy to Google (GOOG) and Facebook (FB).


But she had one thing going for her: the balance sheet. It was pristine. It was better than that, actually. It was brimming with cash.

Pretty much everything, though, was going the wrong way. In a world where tech and the Internet are precisely at the point when the word "obsolete" has turned into its most violent and disruptive form of verb, Yahoo was about to be "obsoleted."

 

So, if the company had to guide down, what's so amazing about what Mayer has done? I think it is threefold:

 

1. She's turned around declining page views. Unless you have been in this game for a while, you have no idea how hard that is to do. She's doing it via improved content, including some expensive content -- more on that in a moment -- as well as tack-on, acquisitions and some improvement in the experience. This is the kind of improvement we are more used to seeing from her predecessor company, Google, than from this one.

 

2. For ages, Yahoo was infamous for losing any employees who were any good. She has brought down the attrition rate by 59%, and 12% of the people whom she has hired are "boomerangs" -- typically talented, disaffected people who want back in because they've heard good things about what Mayer is doing. That's even as we know she promulgated "no right to work" rules -- meaning you had to physically show up to keep your job. Yep, there were a lot of mail-it-inners at the company 366 days ago. There aren't anymore.

 

3. She drastically reoriented the company toward mobile. If you think Facebook didn't have a good mobile strategy a year ago, consider that Yahoo didn't even have many engineers associated with mobile. "Dozens" was the word she used. Now there are hundreds: a sixfold increase.

 

She did all of this without dinging the balance sheet at all on the way to shrinking the shares outstanding from 1.4 billion in 2009 to 1 billion today. She still has $4.8 billion in cash, and a lot more monetizable firepower behind it.


Marissa Mayer on NBC News' 'Today' show on Feb. 20, 2013 (© Peter Kramer/NBC/NBC NewsWire via Getty Images)But there was one line in the call -- actually one word in the call -- that created the hush and then brought on the sell: "programmatic." That's a method of allocating advertising dollars that has swept an industry with too much inventory, and it is sucking all of the margin out of display ads. Gone are the days in "journalism" -- if that's what you want to call a lot of content on Yahoo and other sites around the Web -- when there was a finite amount of copy against which to advertise. In a world where 250,000 blogs are started each day at Yahoo's Tumblr division -- in a world where content is not only not king but even pawn -- you need machines to figure out where to get your best eyeballs.

 

Wanting your ads placed to the right copy, and being willing to pay a premium for it, used to be the bedrock of journalism. That whole idea is now gone. Algorithms tell you where to place those ads. You don't do precision daylight bombing, either. You carpet bomb with machines. While you may end up bombing some places you don't need to reach, you get the job done at a much lower cost, and a much lower profit for those purveying the content.

 

So display ads were "challenged." What about the new page views? Yahoo has "yet to translate into revenue growth."

 

I don't know how it will. Because the money you get for advertising has to come from somewhere non-programmatic. It has to be somewhere that has truly proprietary non-replicable content. A good example is the "Saturday Night Live" deal that everyone was so gaga about on the on-call: old material that is proprietary enough that advertisers might like it.

 

How important is this to Yahoo? There is an incredible mismatch between a lack of video -- which you can still get good rates against -- and what the advertisers want from Yahoo. I think that might be the surest way to reverse this trend, but we can't be sure. With programmatic buying, who knows?

So, despite all of those good works, the stock is going down because its competitors, Google and Facebook, are ahead of Yahoo in trying to cover their flanks against this kind of buying. Google does it in search, while Facebook does it in novel ways to get eyeballs and a plethora of users, including mobile users -- double the number of overall eyeballs that Yahoo has.

 

Now here's the toughest part. You had to bet, with Mayer, that she would solve the basic problems of Yahoo when she took the job last year -- and she has done so. That's points one, two and three above, which she solved without really denting the cash hoard.

 

Now you have to bet with her that she'll solve the programmatic challenge and grow revenue. I was quite confident that she would fulfill miracles one, two and three.

 

I am not going to bet against her now. She has the smarts. She has the firepower.

 

She'll figure it out.

 

I get the profit-taking. But a big selloff? That means you should buy it, not sell it.

 

cramer

 

Jim Cramer is a co-founder of TheStreet and contributes daily market commentary to the financial news network's sites. Follow his trades for Action Alerts PLUS, which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust and is long FB.

 

 

  

More from TheStreet.com

Jul 17, 2013 2:08PM
avatar

thestreet logoIt's easy right now to get disillusioned with Yahoo (YHOO). The last thing you ever want to hear from a company is that numbers have to be taken down. But it sure isn't for lack of trying.

 

CEO Marissa Mayer has done an amazing job in one year's work. She inherited a company with terrible morale -- a company that was way off course and losing market share and relevancy to Google (GOOG) and Facebook (FB).


But she had one thing going for her: the balance sheet. It was pristine. It was better than that, actually. It was brimming with cash.

Pretty much everything, though, was going the wrong way. In a world where tech and the Internet are precisely at the point when the word "obsolete" has turned into its most violent and disruptive form of verb, Yahoo was about to be "obsoleted."

 

So, if the company had to guide down, what's so amazing about what Mayer has done? I think it is threefold:

 

1. She's turned around declining page views. Unless you have been in this game for a while, you have no idea how hard that is to do. She's doing it via improved content, including some expensive content -- more on that in a moment -- as well as tack-on, acquisitions and some improvement in the experience. This is the kind of improvement we are more used to seeing from her predecessor company, Google, than from this one.

 

2. For ages, Yahoo was infamous for losing any employees who were any good. She has brought down the attrition rate by 59%, and 12% of the people whom she has hired are "boomerangs" -- typically talented, disaffected people who want back in because they've heard good things about what Mayer is doing. That's even as we know she promulgated "no right to work" rules -- meaning you had to physically show up to keep your job. Yep, there were a lot of mail-it-inners at the company 366 days ago. There aren't anymore.

 

3. She drastically reoriented the company toward mobile. If you think Facebook didn't have a good mobile strategy a year ago, consider that Yahoo didn't even have many engineers associated with mobile. "Dozens" was the word she used. Now there are hundreds: a sixfold increase.

 

She did all of this without dinging the balance sheet at all on the way to shrinking the shares outstanding from 1.4 billion in 2009 to 1 billion today. She still has $4.8 billion in cash, and a lot more monetizable firepower behind it.


Marissa Mayer on NBC News' 'Today' show on Feb. 20, 2013 (© Peter Kramer/NBC/NBC NewsWire via Getty Images)But there was one line in the call -- actually one word in the call -- that created the hush and then brought on the sell: "programmatic." That's a method of allocating advertising dollars that has swept an industry with too much inventory, and it is sucking all of the margin out of display ads. Gone are the days in "journalism" -- if that's what you want to call a lot of content on Yahoo and other sites around the Web -- when there was a finite amount of copy against which to advertise. In a world where 250,000 blogs are started each day at Yahoo's Tumblr division -- in a world where content is not only not king but even pawn -- you need machines to figure out where to get your best eyeballs.

 

Wanting your ads placed to the right copy, and being willing to pay a premium for it, used to be the bedrock of journalism. That whole idea is now gone. Algorithms tell you where to place those ads. You don't do precision daylight bombing, either. You carpet bomb with machines. While you may end up bombing some places you don't need to reach, you get the job done at a much lower cost, and a much lower profit for those purveying the content.

 

So display ads were "challenged." What about the new page views? Yahoo has "yet to translate into revenue growth."

 

I don't know how it will. Because the money you get for advertising has to come from somewhere non-programmatic. It has to be somewhere that has truly proprietary non-replicable content. A good example is the "Saturday Night Live" deal that everyone was so gaga about on the on-call: old material that is proprietary enough that advertisers might like it.

 

How important is this to Yahoo? There is an incredible mismatch between a lack of video -- which you can still get good rates against -- and what the advertisers want from Yahoo. I think that might be the surest way to reverse this trend, but we can't be sure. With programmatic buying, who knows?

So, despite all of those good works, the stock is going down because its competitors, Google and Facebook, are ahead of Yahoo in trying to cover their flanks against this kind of buying. Google does it in search, while Facebook does it in novel ways to get eyeballs and a plethora of users, including mobile users -- double the number of overall eyeballs that Yahoo has.

 

Now here's the toughest part. You had to bet, with Mayer, that she would solve the basic problems of Yahoo when she took the job last year -- and she has done so. That's points one, two and three above, which she solved without really denting the cash hoard.

 

Now you have to bet with her that she'll solve the programmatic challenge and grow revenue. I was quite confident that she would fulfill miracles one, two and three.

 

I am not going to bet against her now. She has the smarts. She has the firepower.

 

She'll figure it out.

 

I get the profit-taking. But a big selloff? That means you should buy it, not sell it.

 

cramer

 

Jim Cramer is a co-founder of TheStreet and contributes daily market commentary to the financial news network's sites. Follow his trades for Action Alerts PLUS, which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust and is long FB.

 

 

  

More from TheStreet.com

Jul 17, 2013 12:33PM
avatar

thestreet logoIt's easy right now to get disillusioned with Yahoo (YHOO). The last thing you ever want to hear from a company is that numbers have to be taken down. But it sure isn't for lack of trying.

 

CEO Marissa Mayer has done an amazing job in one year's work. She inherited a company with terrible morale -- a company that was way off course and losing market share and relevancy to Google (GOOG) and Facebook (FB).


But she had one thing going for her: the balance sheet. It was pristine. It was better than that, actually. It was brimming with cash.

Pretty much everything, though, was going the wrong way. In a world where tech and the Internet are precisely at the point when the word "obsolete" has turned into its most violent and disruptive form of verb, Yahoo was about to be "obsoleted."

 

So, if the company had to guide down, what's so amazing about what Mayer has done? I think it is threefold:

 

1. She's turned around declining page views. Unless you have been in this game for a while, you have no idea how hard that is to do. She's doing it via improved content, including some expensive content -- more on that in a moment -- as well as tack-on, acquisitions and some improvement in the experience. This is the kind of improvement we are more used to seeing from her predecessor company, Google, than from this one.

 

2. For ages, Yahoo was infamous for losing any employees who were any good. She has brought down the attrition rate by 59%, and 12% of the people whom she has hired are "boomerangs" -- typically talented, disaffected people who want back in because they've heard good things about what Mayer is doing. That's even as we know she promulgated "no right to work" rules -- meaning you had to physically show up to keep your job. Yep, there were a lot of mail-it-inners at the company 366 days ago. There aren't anymore.

 

3. She drastically reoriented the company toward mobile. If you think Facebook didn't have a good mobile strategy a year ago, consider that Yahoo didn't even have many engineers associated with mobile. "Dozens" was the word she used. Now there are hundreds: a sixfold increase.

 

She did all of this without dinging the balance sheet at all on the way to shrinking the shares outstanding from 1.4 billion in 2009 to 1 billion today. She still has $4.8 billion in cash, and a lot more monetizable firepower behind it.


Marissa Mayer on NBC News' 'Today' show on Feb. 20, 2013 (© Peter Kramer/NBC/NBC NewsWire via Getty Images)But there was one line in the call -- actually one word in the call -- that created the hush and then brought on the sell: "programmatic." That's a method of allocating advertising dollars that has swept an industry with too much inventory, and it is sucking all of the margin out of display ads. Gone are the days in "journalism" -- if that's what you want to call a lot of content on Yahoo and other sites around the Web -- when there was a finite amount of copy against which to advertise. In a world where 250,000 blogs are started each day at Yahoo's Tumblr division -- in a world where content is not only not king but even pawn -- you need machines to figure out where to get your best eyeballs.

 

Wanting your ads placed to the right copy, and being willing to pay a premium for it, used to be the bedrock of journalism. That whole idea is now gone. Algorithms tell you where to place those ads. You don't do precision daylight bombing, either. You carpet bomb with machines. While you may end up bombing some places you don't need to reach, you get the job done at a much lower cost, and a much lower profit for those purveying the content.

 

So display ads were "challenged." What about the new page views? Yahoo has "yet to translate into revenue growth."

 

I don't know how it will. Because the money you get for advertising has to come from somewhere non-programmatic. It has to be somewhere that has truly proprietary non-replicable content. A good example is the "Saturday Night Live" deal that everyone was so gaga about on the on-call: old material that is proprietary enough that advertisers might like it.

 

How important is this to Yahoo? There is an incredible mismatch between a lack of video -- which you can still get good rates against -- and what the advertisers want from Yahoo. I think that might be the surest way to reverse this trend, but we can't be sure. With programmatic buying, who knows?

So, despite all of those good works, the stock is going down because its competitors, Google and Facebook, are ahead of Yahoo in trying to cover their flanks against this kind of buying. Google does it in search, while Facebook does it in novel ways to get eyeballs and a plethora of users, including mobile users -- double the number of overall eyeballs that Yahoo has.

 

Now here's the toughest part. You had to bet, with Mayer, that she would solve the basic problems of Yahoo when she took the job last year -- and she has done so. That's points one, two and three above, which she solved without really denting the cash hoard.

 

Now you have to bet with her that she'll solve the programmatic challenge and grow revenue. I was quite confident that she would fulfill miracles one, two and three.

 

I am not going to bet against her now. She has the smarts. She has the firepower.

 

She'll figure it out.

 

I get the profit-taking. But a big selloff? That means you should buy it, not sell it.

 

cramer

 

Jim Cramer is a co-founder of TheStreet and contributes daily market commentary to the financial news network's sites. Follow his trades for Action Alerts PLUS, which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust and is long FB.

 

 

  

More from TheStreet.com

Jul 17, 2013 11:02AM
avatar

thestreet logoIt's easy right now to get disillusioned with Yahoo (YHOO). The last thing you ever want to hear from a company is that numbers have to be taken down. But it sure isn't for lack of trying.

 

CEO Marissa Mayer has done an amazing job in one year's work. She inherited a company with terrible morale -- a company that was way off course and losing market share and relevancy to Google (GOOG) and Facebook (FB).


But she had one thing going for her: the balance sheet. It was pristine. It was better than that, actually. It was brimming with cash.

Pretty much everything, though, was going the wrong way. In a world where tech and the Internet are precisely at the point when the word "obsolete" has turned into its most violent and disruptive form of verb, Yahoo was about to be "obsoleted."

 

So, if the company had to guide down, what's so amazing about what Mayer has done? I think it is threefold:

 

1. She's turned around declining page views. Unless you have been in this game for a while, you have no idea how hard that is to do. She's doing it via improved content, including some expensive content -- more on that in a moment -- as well as tack-on, acquisitions and some improvement in the experience. This is the kind of improvement we are more used to seeing from her predecessor company, Google, than from this one.

 

2. For ages, Yahoo was infamous for losing any employees who were any good. She has brought down the attrition rate by 59%, and 12% of the people whom she has hired are "boomerangs" -- typically talented, disaffected people who want back in because they've heard good things about what Mayer is doing. That's even as we know she promulgated "no right to work" rules -- meaning you had to physically show up to keep your job. Yep, there were a lot of mail-it-inners at the company 366 days ago. There aren't anymore.

 

3. She drastically reoriented the company toward mobile. If you think Facebook didn't have a good mobile strategy a year ago, consider that Yahoo didn't even have many engineers associated with mobile. "Dozens" was the word she used. Now there are hundreds: a sixfold increase.

 

She did all of this without dinging the balance sheet at all on the way to shrinking the shares outstanding from 1.4 billion in 2009 to 1 billion today. She still has $4.8 billion in cash, and a lot more monetizable firepower behind it.


Marissa Mayer on NBC News' 'Today' show on Feb. 20, 2013 (© Peter Kramer/NBC/NBC NewsWire via Getty Images)But there was one line in the call -- actually one word in the call -- that created the hush and then brought on the sell: "programmatic." That's a method of allocating advertising dollars that has swept an industry with too much inventory, and it is sucking all of the margin out of display ads. Gone are the days in "journalism" -- if that's what you want to call a lot of content on Yahoo and other sites around the Web -- when there was a finite amount of copy against which to advertise. In a world where 250,000 blogs are started each day at Yahoo's Tumblr division -- in a world where content is not only not king but even pawn -- you need machines to figure out where to get your best eyeballs.

 

Wanting your ads placed to the right copy, and being willing to pay a premium for it, used to be the bedrock of journalism. That whole idea is now gone. Algorithms tell you where to place those ads. You don't do precision daylight bombing, either. You carpet bomb with machines. While you may end up bombing some places you don't need to reach, you get the job done at a much lower cost, and a much lower profit for those purveying the content.

 

So display ads were "challenged." What about the new page views? Yahoo has "yet to translate into revenue growth."

 

I don't know how it will. Because the money you get for advertising has to come from somewhere non-programmatic. It has to be somewhere that has truly proprietary non-replicable content. A good example is the "Saturday Night Live" deal that everyone was so gaga about on the on-call: old material that is proprietary enough that advertisers might like it.

 

How important is this to Yahoo? There is an incredible mismatch between a lack of video -- which you can still get good rates against -- and what the advertisers want from Yahoo. I think that might be the surest way to reverse this trend, but we can't be sure. With programmatic buying, who knows?

So, despite all of those good works, the stock is going down because its competitors, Google and Facebook, are ahead of Yahoo in trying to cover their flanks against this kind of buying. Google does it in search, while Facebook does it in novel ways to get eyeballs and a plethora of users, including mobile users -- double the number of overall eyeballs that Yahoo has.

 

Now here's the toughest part. You had to bet, with Mayer, that she would solve the basic problems of Yahoo when she took the job last year -- and she has done so. That's points one, two and three above, which she solved without really denting the cash hoard.

 

Now you have to bet with her that she'll solve the programmatic challenge and grow revenue. I was quite confident that she would fulfill miracles one, two and three.

 

I am not going to bet against her now. She has the smarts. She has the firepower.

 

She'll figure it out.

 

I get the profit-taking. But a big selloff? That means you should buy it, not sell it.

 

cramer

 

Jim Cramer is a co-founder of TheStreet and contributes daily market commentary to the financial news network's sites. Follow his trades for Action Alerts PLUS, which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust and is long FB.

 

 

  

More from TheStreet.com

Jul 17, 2013 11:18AM
avatar

thestreet logoIt's easy right now to get disillusioned with Yahoo (YHOO). The last thing you ever want to hear from a company is that numbers have to be taken down. But it sure isn't for lack of trying.

 

CEO Marissa Mayer has done an amazing job in one year's work. She inherited a company with terrible morale -- a company that was way off course and losing market share and relevancy to Google (GOOG) and Facebook (FB).


But she had one thing going for her: the balance sheet. It was pristine. It was better than that, actually. It was brimming with cash.

Pretty much everything, though, was going the wrong way. In a world where tech and the Internet are precisely at the point when the word "obsolete" has turned into its most violent and disruptive form of verb, Yahoo was about to be "obsoleted."

 

So, if the company had to guide down, what's so amazing about what Mayer has done? I think it is threefold:

 

1. She's turned around declining page views. Unless you have been in this game for a while, you have no idea how hard that is to do. She's doing it via improved content, including some expensive content -- more on that in a moment -- as well as tack-on, acquisitions and some improvement in the experience. This is the kind of improvement we are more used to seeing from her predecessor company, Google, than from this one.

 

2. For ages, Yahoo was infamous for losing any employees who were any good. She has brought down the attrition rate by 59%, and 12% of the people whom she has hired are "boomerangs" -- typically talented, disaffected people who want back in because they've heard good things about what Mayer is doing. That's even as we know she promulgated "no right to work" rules -- meaning you had to physically show up to keep your job. Yep, there were a lot of mail-it-inners at the company 366 days ago. There aren't anymore.

 

3. She drastically reoriented the company toward mobile. If you think Facebook didn't have a good mobile strategy a year ago, consider that Yahoo didn't even have many engineers associated with mobile. "Dozens" was the word she used. Now there are hundreds: a sixfold increase.

 

She did all of this without dinging the balance sheet at all on the way to shrinking the shares outstanding from 1.4 billion in 2009 to 1 billion today. She still has $4.8 billion in cash, and a lot more monetizable firepower behind it.


Marissa Mayer on NBC News' 'Today' show on Feb. 20, 2013 (© Peter Kramer/NBC/NBC NewsWire via Getty Images)But there was one line in the call -- actually one word in the call -- that created the hush and then brought on the sell: "programmatic." That's a method of allocating advertising dollars that has swept an industry with too much inventory, and it is sucking all of the margin out of display ads. Gone are the days in "journalism" -- if that's what you want to call a lot of content on Yahoo and other sites around the Web -- when there was a finite amount of copy against which to advertise. In a world where 250,000 blogs are started each day at Yahoo's Tumblr division -- in a world where content is not only not king but even pawn -- you need machines to figure out where to get your best eyeballs.

 

Wanting your ads placed to the right copy, and being willing to pay a premium for it, used to be the bedrock of journalism. That whole idea is now gone. Algorithms tell you where to place those ads. You don't do precision daylight bombing, either. You carpet bomb with machines. While you may end up bombing some places you don't need to reach, you get the job done at a much lower cost, and a much lower profit for those purveying the content.

 

So display ads were "challenged." What about the new page views? Yahoo has "yet to translate into revenue growth."

 

I don't know how it will. Because the money you get for advertising has to come from somewhere non-programmatic. It has to be somewhere that has truly proprietary non-replicable content. A good example is the "Saturday Night Live" deal that everyone was so gaga about on the on-call: old material that is proprietary enough that advertisers might like it.

 

How important is this to Yahoo? There is an incredible mismatch between a lack of video -- which you can still get good rates against -- and what the advertisers want from Yahoo. I think that might be the surest way to reverse this trend, but we can't be sure. With programmatic buying, who knows?

So, despite all of those good works, the stock is going down because its competitors, Google and Facebook, are ahead of Yahoo in trying to cover their flanks against this kind of buying. Google does it in search, while Facebook does it in novel ways to get eyeballs and a plethora of users, including mobile users -- double the number of overall eyeballs that Yahoo has.

 

Now here's the toughest part. You had to bet, with Mayer, that she would solve the basic problems of Yahoo when she took the job last year -- and she has done so. That's points one, two and three above, which she solved without really denting the cash hoard.

 

Now you have to bet with her that she'll solve the programmatic challenge and grow revenue. I was quite confident that she would fulfill miracles one, two and three.

 

I am not going to bet against her now. She has the smarts. She has the firepower.

 

She'll figure it out.

 

I get the profit-taking. But a big selloff? That means you should buy it, not sell it.

 

cramer

 

Jim Cramer is a co-founder of TheStreet and contributes daily market commentary to the financial news network's sites. Follow his trades for Action Alerts PLUS, which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust and is long FB.

 

 

  

More from TheStreet.com

Jul 17, 2013 11:00AM
avatar

thestreet logoIt's easy right now to get disillusioned with Yahoo (YHOO). The last thing you ever want to hear from a company is that numbers have to be taken down. But it sure isn't for lack of trying.

 

CEO Marissa Mayer has done an amazing job in one year's work. She inherited a company with terrible morale -- a company that was way off course and losing market share and relevancy to Google (GOOG) and Facebook (FB).


But she had one thing going for her: the balance sheet. It was pristine. It was better than that, actually. It was brimming with cash.

Pretty much everything, though, was going the wrong way. In a world where tech and the Internet are precisely at the point when the word "obsolete" has turned into its most violent and disruptive form of verb, Yahoo was about to be "obsoleted."

 

So, if the company had to guide down, what's so amazing about what Mayer has done? I think it is threefold:

 

1. She's turned around declining page views. Unless you have been in this game for a while, you have no idea how hard that is to do. She's doing it via improved content, including some expensive content -- more on that in a moment -- as well as tack-on, acquisitions and some improvement in the experience. This is the kind of improvement we are more used to seeing from her predecessor company, Google, than from this one.

 

2. For ages, Yahoo was infamous for losing any employees who were any good. She has brought down the attrition rate by 59%, and 12% of the people whom she has hired are "boomerangs" -- typically talented, disaffected people who want back in because they've heard good things about what Mayer is doing. That's even as we know she promulgated "no right to work" rules -- meaning you had to physically show up to keep your job. Yep, there were a lot of mail-it-inners at the company 366 days ago. There aren't anymore.

 

3. She drastically reoriented the company toward mobile. If you think Facebook didn't have a good mobile strategy a year ago, consider that Yahoo didn't even have many engineers associated with mobile. "Dozens" was the word she used. Now there are hundreds: a sixfold increase.

 

She did all of this without dinging the balance sheet at all on the way to shrinking the shares outstanding from 1.4 billion in 2009 to 1 billion today. She still has $4.8 billion in cash, and a lot more monetizable firepower behind it.


Marissa Mayer on NBC News' 'Today' show on Feb. 20, 2013 (© Peter Kramer/NBC/NBC NewsWire via Getty Images)But there was one line in the call -- actually one word in the call -- that created the hush and then brought on the sell: "programmatic." That's a method of allocating advertising dollars that has swept an industry with too much inventory, and it is sucking all of the margin out of display ads. Gone are the days in "journalism" -- if that's what you want to call a lot of content on Yahoo and other sites around the Web -- when there was a finite amount of copy against which to advertise. In a world where 250,000 blogs are started each day at Yahoo's Tumblr division -- in a world where content is not only not king but even pawn -- you need machines to figure out where to get your best eyeballs.

 

Wanting your ads placed to the right copy, and being willing to pay a premium for it, used to be the bedrock of journalism. That whole idea is now gone. Algorithms tell you where to place those ads. You don't do precision daylight bombing, either. You carpet bomb with machines. While you may end up bombing some places you don't need to reach, you get the job done at a much lower cost, and a much lower profit for those purveying the content.

 

So display ads were "challenged." What about the new page views? Yahoo has "yet to translate into revenue growth."

 

I don't know how it will. Because the money you get for advertising has to come from somewhere non-programmatic. It has to be somewhere that has truly proprietary non-replicable content. A good example is the "Saturday Night Live" deal that everyone was so gaga about on the on-call: old material that is proprietary enough that advertisers might like it.

 

How important is this to Yahoo? There is an incredible mismatch between a lack of video -- which you can still get good rates against -- and what the advertisers want from Yahoo. I think that might be the surest way to reverse this trend, but we can't be sure. With programmatic buying, who knows?

So, despite all of those good works, the stock is going down because its competitors, Google and Facebook, are ahead of Yahoo in trying to cover their flanks against this kind of buying. Google does it in search, while Facebook does it in novel ways to get eyeballs and a plethora of users, including mobile users -- double the number of overall eyeballs that Yahoo has.

 

Now here's the toughest part. You had to bet, with Mayer, that she would solve the basic problems of Yahoo when she took the job last year -- and she has done so. That's points one, two and three above, which she solved without really denting the cash hoard.

 

Now you have to bet with her that she'll solve the programmatic challenge and grow revenue. I was quite confident that she would fulfill miracles one, two and three.

 

I am not going to bet against her now. She has the smarts. She has the firepower.

 

She'll figure it out.

 

I get the profit-taking. But a big selloff? That means you should buy it, not sell it.

 

cramer

 

Jim Cramer is a co-founder of TheStreet and contributes daily market commentary to the financial news network's sites. Follow his trades for Action Alerts PLUS, which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust and is long FB.

 

 

  

More from TheStreet.com

Jul 17, 2013 2:24PM
avatar

thestreet logoIt's easy right now to get disillusioned with Yahoo (YHOO). The last thing you ever want to hear from a company is that numbers have to be taken down. But it sure isn't for lack of trying.

 

CEO Marissa Mayer has done an amazing job in one year's work. She inherited a company with terrible morale -- a company that was way off course and losing market share and relevancy to Google (GOOG) and Facebook (FB).


But she had one thing going for her: the balance sheet. It was pristine. It was better than that, actually. It was brimming with cash.

Pretty much everything, though, was going the wrong way. In a world where tech and the Internet are precisely at the point when the word "obsolete" has turned into its most violent and disruptive form of verb, Yahoo was about to be "obsoleted."

 

So, if the company had to guide down, what's so amazing about what Mayer has done? I think it is threefold:

 

1. She's turned around declining page views. Unless you have been in this game for a while, you have no idea how hard that is to do. She's doing it via improved content, including some expensive content -- more on that in a moment -- as well as tack-on, acquisitions and some improvement in the experience. This is the kind of improvement we are more used to seeing from her predecessor company, Google, than from this one.

 

2. For ages, Yahoo was infamous for losing any employees who were any good. She has brought down the attrition rate by 59%, and 12% of the people whom she has hired are "boomerangs" -- typically talented, disaffected people who want back in because they've heard good things about what Mayer is doing. That's even as we know she promulgated "no right to work" rules -- meaning you had to physically show up to keep your job. Yep, there were a lot of mail-it-inners at the company 366 days ago. There aren't anymore.

 

3. She drastically reoriented the company toward mobile. If you think Facebook didn't have a good mobile strategy a year ago, consider that Yahoo didn't even have many engineers associated with mobile. "Dozens" was the word she used. Now there are hundreds: a sixfold increase.

 

She did all of this without dinging the balance sheet at all on the way to shrinking the shares outstanding from 1.4 billion in 2009 to 1 billion today. She still has $4.8 billion in cash, and a lot more monetizable firepower behind it.


Marissa Mayer on NBC News' 'Today' show on Feb. 20, 2013 (© Peter Kramer/NBC/NBC NewsWire via Getty Images)But there was one line in the call -- actually one word in the call -- that created the hush and then brought on the sell: "programmatic." That's a method of allocating advertising dollars that has swept an industry with too much inventory, and it is sucking all of the margin out of display ads. Gone are the days in "journalism" -- if that's what you want to call a lot of content on Yahoo and other sites around the Web -- when there was a finite amount of copy against which to advertise. In a world where 250,000 blogs are started each day at Yahoo's Tumblr division -- in a world where content is not only not king but even pawn -- you need machines to figure out where to get your best eyeballs.

 

Wanting your ads placed to the right copy, and being willing to pay a premium for it, used to be the bedrock of journalism. That whole idea is now gone. Algorithms tell you where to place those ads. You don't do precision daylight bombing, either. You carpet bomb with machines. While you may end up bombing some places you don't need to reach, you get the job done at a much lower cost, and a much lower profit for those purveying the content.

 

So display ads were "challenged." What about the new page views? Yahoo has "yet to translate into revenue growth."

 

I don't know how it will. Because the money you get for advertising has to come from somewhere non-programmatic. It has to be somewhere that has truly proprietary non-replicable content. A good example is the "Saturday Night Live" deal that everyone was so gaga about on the on-call: old material that is proprietary enough that advertisers might like it.

 

How important is this to Yahoo? There is an incredible mismatch between a lack of video -- which you can still get good rates against -- and what the advertisers want from Yahoo. I think that might be the surest way to reverse this trend, but we can't be sure. With programmatic buying, who knows?

So, despite all of those good works, the stock is going down because its competitors, Google and Facebook, are ahead of Yahoo in trying to cover their flanks against this kind of buying. Google does it in search, while Facebook does it in novel ways to get eyeballs and a plethora of users, including mobile users -- double the number of overall eyeballs that Yahoo has.

 

Now here's the toughest part. You had to bet, with Mayer, that she would solve the basic problems of Yahoo when she took the job last year -- and she has done so. That's points one, two and three above, which she solved without really denting the cash hoard.

 

Now you have to bet with her that she'll solve the programmatic challenge and grow revenue. I was quite confident that she would fulfill miracles one, two and three.

 

I am not going to bet against her now. She has the smarts. She has the firepower.

 

She'll figure it out.

 

I get the profit-taking. But a big selloff? That means you should buy it, not sell it.

 

cramer

 

Jim Cramer is a co-founder of TheStreet and contributes daily market commentary to the financial news network's sites. Follow his trades for Action Alerts PLUS, which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust and is long FB.

 

 

  

More from TheStreet.com

Jul 17, 2013 1:30PM
avatar

thestreet logoIt's easy right now to get disillusioned with Yahoo (YHOO). The last thing you ever want to hear from a company is that numbers have to be taken down. But it sure isn't for lack of trying.

 

CEO Marissa Mayer has done an amazing job in one year's work. She inherited a company with terrible morale -- a company that was way off course and losing market share and relevancy to Google (GOOG) and Facebook (FB).


But she had one thing going for her: the balance sheet. It was pristine. It was better than that, actually. It was brimming with cash.

Pretty much everything, though, was going the wrong way. In a world where tech and the Internet are precisely at the point when the word "obsolete" has turned into its most violent and disruptive form of verb, Yahoo was about to be "obsoleted."

 

So, if the company had to guide down, what's so amazing about what Mayer has done? I think it is threefold:

 

1. She's turned around declining page views. Unless you have been in this game for a while, you have no idea how hard that is to do. She's doing it via improved content, including some expensive content -- more on that in a moment -- as well as tack-on, acquisitions and some improvement in the experience. This is the kind of improvement we are more used to seeing from her predecessor company, Google, than from this one.

 

2. For ages, Yahoo was infamous for losing any employees who were any good. She has brought down the attrition rate by 59%, and 12% of the people whom she has hired are "boomerangs" -- typically talented, disaffected people who want back in because they've heard good things about what Mayer is doing. That's even as we know she promulgated "no right to work" rules -- meaning you had to physically show up to keep your job. Yep, there were a lot of mail-it-inners at the company 366 days ago. There aren't anymore.

 

3. She drastically reoriented the company toward mobile. If you think Facebook didn't have a good mobile strategy a year ago, consider that Yahoo didn't even have many engineers associated with mobile. "Dozens" was the word she used. Now there are hundreds: a sixfold increase.

 

She did all of this without dinging the balance sheet at all on the way to shrinking the shares outstanding from 1.4 billion in 2009 to 1 billion today. She still has $4.8 billion in cash, and a lot more monetizable firepower behind it.


Marissa Mayer on NBC News' 'Today' show on Feb. 20, 2013 (© Peter Kramer/NBC/NBC NewsWire via Getty Images)But there was one line in the call -- actually one word in the call -- that created the hush and then brought on the sell: "programmatic." That's a method of allocating advertising dollars that has swept an industry with too much inventory, and it is sucking all of the margin out of display ads. Gone are the days in "journalism" -- if that's what you want to call a lot of content on Yahoo and other sites around the Web -- when there was a finite amount of copy against which to advertise. In a world where 250,000 blogs are started each day at Yahoo's Tumblr division -- in a world where content is not only not king but even pawn -- you need machines to figure out where to get your best eyeballs.

 

Wanting your ads placed to the right copy, and being willing to pay a premium for it, used to be the bedrock of journalism. That whole idea is now gone. Algorithms tell you where to place those ads. You don't do precision daylight bombing, either. You carpet bomb with machines. While you may end up bombing some places you don't need to reach, you get the job done at a much lower cost, and a much lower profit for those purveying the content.

 

So display ads were "challenged." What about the new page views? Yahoo has "yet to translate into revenue growth."

 

I don't know how it will. Because the money you get for advertising has to come from somewhere non-programmatic. It has to be somewhere that has truly proprietary non-replicable content. A good example is the "Saturday Night Live" deal that everyone was so gaga about on the on-call: old material that is proprietary enough that advertisers might like it.

 

How important is this to Yahoo? There is an incredible mismatch between a lack of video -- which you can still get good rates against -- and what the advertisers want from Yahoo. I think that might be the surest way to reverse this trend, but we can't be sure. With programmatic buying, who knows?

So, despite all of those good works, the stock is going down because its competitors, Google and Facebook, are ahead of Yahoo in trying to cover their flanks against this kind of buying. Google does it in search, while Facebook does it in novel ways to get eyeballs and a plethora of users, including mobile users -- double the number of overall eyeballs that Yahoo has.

 

Now here's the toughest part. You had to bet, with Mayer, that she would solve the basic problems of Yahoo when she took the job last year -- and she has done so. That's points one, two and three above, which she solved without really denting the cash hoard.

 

Now you have to bet with her that she'll solve the programmatic challenge and grow revenue. I was quite confident that she would fulfill miracles one, two and three.

 

I am not going to bet against her now. She has the smarts. She has the firepower.

 

She'll figure it out.

 

I get the profit-taking. But a big selloff? That means you should buy it, not sell it.

 

cramer

 

Jim Cramer is a co-founder of TheStreet and contributes daily market commentary to the financial news network's sites. Follow his trades for Action Alerts PLUS, which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust and is long FB.

 

 

  

More from TheStreet.com

Jul 17, 2013 11:07AM
avatar

thestreet logoIt's easy right now to get disillusioned with Yahoo (YHOO). The last thing you ever want to hear from a company is that numbers have to be taken down. But it sure isn't for lack of trying.

 

CEO Marissa Mayer has done an amazing job in one year's work. She inherited a company with terrible morale -- a company that was way off course and losing market share and relevancy to Google (GOOG) and Facebook (FB).


But she had one thing going for her: the balance sheet. It was pristine. It was better than that, actually. It was brimming with cash.

Pretty much everything, though, was going the wrong way. In a world where tech and the Internet are precisely at the point when the word "obsolete" has turned into its most violent and disruptive form of verb, Yahoo was about to be "obsoleted."

 

So, if the company had to guide down, what's so amazing about what Mayer has done? I think it is threefold:

 

1. She's turned around declining page views. Unless you have been in this game for a while, you have no idea how hard that is to do. She's doing it via improved content, including some expensive content -- more on that in a moment -- as well as tack-on, acquisitions and some improvement in the experience. This is the kind of improvement we are more used to seeing from her predecessor company, Google, than from this one.

 

2. For ages, Yahoo was infamous for losing any employees who were any good. She has brought down the attrition rate by 59%, and 12% of the people whom she has hired are "boomerangs" -- typically talented, disaffected people who want back in because they've heard good things about what Mayer is doing. That's even as we know she promulgated "no right to work" rules -- meaning you had to physically show up to keep your job. Yep, there were a lot of mail-it-inners at the company 366 days ago. There aren't anymore.

 

3. She drastically reoriented the company toward mobile. If you think Facebook didn't have a good mobile strategy a year ago, consider that Yahoo didn't even have many engineers associated with mobile. "Dozens" was the word she used. Now there are hundreds: a sixfold increase.

 

She did all of this without dinging the balance sheet at all on the way to shrinking the shares outstanding from 1.4 billion in 2009 to 1 billion today. She still has $4.8 billion in cash, and a lot more monetizable firepower behind it.


Marissa Mayer on NBC News' 'Today' show on Feb. 20, 2013 (© Peter Kramer/NBC/NBC NewsWire via Getty Images)But there was one line in the call -- actually one word in the call -- that created the hush and then brought on the sell: "programmatic." That's a method of allocating advertising dollars that has swept an industry with too much inventory, and it is sucking all of the margin out of display ads. Gone are the days in "journalism" -- if that's what you want to call a lot of content on Yahoo and other sites around the Web -- when there was a finite amount of copy against which to advertise. In a world where 250,000 blogs are started each day at Yahoo's Tumblr division -- in a world where content is not only not king but even pawn -- you need machines to figure out where to get your best eyeballs.

 

Wanting your ads placed to the right copy, and being willing to pay a premium for it, used to be the bedrock of journalism. That whole idea is now gone. Algorithms tell you where to place those ads. You don't do precision daylight bombing, either. You carpet bomb with machines. While you may end up bombing some places you don't need to reach, you get the job done at a much lower cost, and a much lower profit for those purveying the content.

 

So display ads were "challenged." What about the new page views? Yahoo has "yet to translate into revenue growth."

 

I don't know how it will. Because the money you get for advertising has to come from somewhere non-programmatic. It has to be somewhere that has truly proprietary non-replicable content. A good example is the "Saturday Night Live" deal that everyone was so gaga about on the on-call: old material that is proprietary enough that advertisers might like it.

 

How important is this to Yahoo? There is an incredible mismatch between a lack of video -- which you can still get good rates against -- and what the advertisers want from Yahoo. I think that might be the surest way to reverse this trend, but we can't be sure. With programmatic buying, who knows?

So, despite all of those good works, the stock is going down because its competitors, Google and Facebook, are ahead of Yahoo in trying to cover their flanks against this kind of buying. Google does it in search, while Facebook does it in novel ways to get eyeballs and a plethora of users, including mobile users -- double the number of overall eyeballs that Yahoo has.

 

Now here's the toughest part. You had to bet, with Mayer, that she would solve the basic problems of Yahoo when she took the job last year -- and she has done so. That's points one, two and three above, which she solved without really denting the cash hoard.

 

Now you have to bet with her that she'll solve the programmatic challenge and grow revenue. I was quite confident that she would fulfill miracles one, two and three.

 

I am not going to bet against her now. She has the smarts. She has the firepower.

 

She'll figure it out.

 

I get the profit-taking. But a big selloff? That means you should buy it, not sell it.

 

cramer

 

Jim Cramer is a co-founder of TheStreet and contributes daily market commentary to the financial news network's sites. Follow his trades for Action Alerts PLUS, which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust and is long FB.

 

 

  

More from TheStreet.com

Jul 17, 2013 10:22AM
avatar

thestreet logoIt's easy right now to get disillusioned with Yahoo (YHOO). The last thing you ever want to hear from a company is that numbers have to be taken down. But it sure isn't for lack of trying.

 

CEO Marissa Mayer has done an amazing job in one year's work. She inherited a company with terrible morale -- a company that was way off course and losing market share and relevancy to Google (GOOG) and Facebook (FB).


But she had one thing going for her: the balance sheet. It was pristine. It was better than that, actually. It was brimming with cash.

Pretty much everything, though, was going the wrong way. In a world where tech and the Internet are precisely at the point when the word "obsolete" has turned into its most violent and disruptive form of verb, Yahoo was about to be "obsoleted."

 

So, if the company had to guide down, what's so amazing about what Mayer has done? I think it is threefold:

 

1. She's turned around declining page views. Unless you have been in this game for a while, you have no idea how hard that is to do. She's doing it via improved content, including some expensive content -- more on that in a moment -- as well as tack-on, acquisitions and some improvement in the experience. This is the kind of improvement we are more used to seeing from her predecessor company, Google, than from this one.

 

2. For ages, Yahoo was infamous for losing any employees who were any good. She has brought down the attrition rate by 59%, and 12% of the people whom she has hired are "boomerangs" -- typically talented, disaffected people who want back in because they've heard good things about what Mayer is doing. That's even as we know she promulgated "no right to work" rules -- meaning you had to physically show up to keep your job. Yep, there were a lot of mail-it-inners at the company 366 days ago. There aren't anymore.

 

3. She drastically reoriented the company toward mobile. If you think Facebook didn't have a good mobile strategy a year ago, consider that Yahoo didn't even have many engineers associated with mobile. "Dozens" was the word she used. Now there are hundreds: a sixfold increase.

 

She did all of this without dinging the balance sheet at all on the way to shrinking the shares outstanding from 1.4 billion in 2009 to 1 billion today. She still has $4.8 billion in cash, and a lot more monetizable firepower behind it.


Marissa Mayer on NBC News' 'Today' show on Feb. 20, 2013 (© Peter Kramer/NBC/NBC NewsWire via Getty Images)But there was one line in the call -- actually one word in the call -- that created the hush and then brought on the sell: "programmatic." That's a method of allocating advertising dollars that has swept an industry with too much inventory, and it is sucking all of the margin out of display ads. Gone are the days in "journalism" -- if that's what you want to call a lot of content on Yahoo and other sites around the Web -- when there was a finite amount of copy against which to advertise. In a world where 250,000 blogs are started each day at Yahoo's Tumblr division -- in a world where content is not only not king but even pawn -- you need machines to figure out where to get your best eyeballs.

 

Wanting your ads placed to the right copy, and being willing to pay a premium for it, used to be the bedrock of journalism. That whole idea is now gone. Algorithms tell you where to place those ads. You don't do precision daylight bombing, either. You carpet bomb with machines. While you may end up bombing some places you don't need to reach, you get the job done at a much lower cost, and a much lower profit for those purveying the content.

 

So display ads were "challenged." What about the new page views? Yahoo has "yet to translate into revenue growth."

 

I don't know how it will. Because the money you get for advertising has to come from somewhere non-programmatic. It has to be somewhere that has truly proprietary non-replicable content. A good example is the "Saturday Night Live" deal that everyone was so gaga about on the on-call: old material that is proprietary enough that advertisers might like it.

 

How important is this to Yahoo? There is an incredible mismatch between a lack of video -- which you can still get good rates against -- and what the advertisers want from Yahoo. I think that might be the surest way to reverse this trend, but we can't be sure. With programmatic buying, who knows?

So, despite all of those good works, the stock is going down because its competitors, Google and Facebook, are ahead of Yahoo in trying to cover their flanks against this kind of buying. Google does it in search, while Facebook does it in novel ways to get eyeballs and a plethora of users, including mobile users -- double the number of overall eyeballs that Yahoo has.

 

Now here's the toughest part. You had to bet, with Mayer, that she would solve the basic problems of Yahoo when she took the job last year -- and she has done so. That's points one, two and three above, which she solved without really denting the cash hoard.

 

Now you have to bet with her that she'll solve the programmatic challenge and grow revenue. I was quite confident that she would fulfill miracles one, two and three.

 

I am not going to bet against her now. She has the smarts. She has the firepower.

 

She'll figure it out.

 

I get the profit-taking. But a big selloff? That means you should buy it, not sell it.

 

cramer

 

Jim Cramer is a co-founder of TheStreet and contributes daily market commentary to the financial news network's sites. Follow his trades for Action Alerts PLUS, which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust and is long FB.

 

 

  

More from TheStreet.com

Jul 17, 2013 11:41AM
avatar

thestreet logoIt's easy right now to get disillusioned with Yahoo (YHOO). The last thing you ever want to hear from a company is that numbers have to be taken down. But it sure isn't for lack of trying.

 

CEO Marissa Mayer has done an amazing job in one year's work. She inherited a company with terrible morale -- a company that was way off course and losing market share and relevancy to Google (GOOG) and Facebook (FB).


But she had one thing going for her: the balance sheet. It was pristine. It was better than that, actually. It was brimming with cash.

Pretty much everything, though, was going the wrong way. In a world where tech and the Internet are precisely at the point when the word "obsolete" has turned into its most violent and disruptive form of verb, Yahoo was about to be "obsoleted."

 

So, if the company had to guide down, what's so amazing about what Mayer has done? I think it is threefold:

 

1. She's turned around declining page views. Unless you have been in this game for a while, you have no idea how hard that is to do. She's doing it via improved content, including some expensive content -- more on that in a moment -- as well as tack-on, acquisitions and some improvement in the experience. This is the kind of improvement we are more used to seeing from her predecessor company, Google, than from this one.

 

2. For ages, Yahoo was infamous for losing any employees who were any good. She has brought down the attrition rate by 59%, and 12% of the people whom she has hired are "boomerangs" -- typically talented, disaffected people who want back in because they've heard good things about what Mayer is doing. That's even as we know she promulgated "no right to work" rules -- meaning you had to physically show up to keep your job. Yep, there were a lot of mail-it-inners at the company 366 days ago. There aren't anymore.

 

3. She drastically reoriented the company toward mobile. If you think Facebook didn't have a good mobile strategy a year ago, consider that Yahoo didn't even have many engineers associated with mobile. "Dozens" was the word she used. Now there are hundreds: a sixfold increase.

 

She did all of this without dinging the balance sheet at all on the way to shrinking the shares outstanding from 1.4 billion in 2009 to 1 billion today. She still has $4.8 billion in cash, and a lot more monetizable firepower behind it.


Marissa Mayer on NBC News' 'Today' show on Feb. 20, 2013 (© Peter Kramer/NBC/NBC NewsWire via Getty Images)But there was one line in the call -- actually one word in the call -- that created the hush and then brought on the sell: "programmatic." That's a method of allocating advertising dollars that has swept an industry with too much inventory, and it is sucking all of the margin out of display ads. Gone are the days in "journalism" -- if that's what you want to call a lot of content on Yahoo and other sites around the Web -- when there was a finite amount of copy against which to advertise. In a world where 250,000 blogs are started each day at Yahoo's Tumblr division -- in a world where content is not only not king but even pawn -- you need machines to figure out where to get your best eyeballs.

 

Wanting your ads placed to the right copy, and being willing to pay a premium for it, used to be the bedrock of journalism. That whole idea is now gone. Algorithms tell you where to place those ads. You don't do precision daylight bombing, either. You carpet bomb with machines. While you may end up bombing some places you don't need to reach, you get the job done at a much lower cost, and a much lower profit for those purveying the content.

 

So display ads were "challenged." What about the new page views? Yahoo has "yet to translate into revenue growth."

 

I don't know how it will. Because the money you get for advertising has to come from somewhere non-programmatic. It has to be somewhere that has truly proprietary non-replicable content. A good example is the "Saturday Night Live" deal that everyone was so gaga about on the on-call: old material that is proprietary enough that advertisers might like it.

 

How important is this to Yahoo? There is an incredible mismatch between a lack of video -- which you can still get good rates against -- and what the advertisers want from Yahoo. I think that might be the surest way to reverse this trend, but we can't be sure. With programmatic buying, who knows?

So, despite all of those good works, the stock is going down because its competitors, Google and Facebook, are ahead of Yahoo in trying to cover their flanks against this kind of buying. Google does it in search, while Facebook does it in novel ways to get eyeballs and a plethora of users, including mobile users -- double the number of overall eyeballs that Yahoo has.

 

Now here's the toughest part. You had to bet, with Mayer, that she would solve the basic problems of Yahoo when she took the job last year -- and she has done so. That's points one, two and three above, which she solved without really denting the cash hoard.

 

Now you have to bet with her that she'll solve the programmatic challenge and grow revenue. I was quite confident that she would fulfill miracles one, two and three.

 

I am not going to bet against her now. She has the smarts. She has the firepower.

 

She'll figure it out.

 

I get the profit-taking. But a big selloff? That means you should buy it, not sell it.

 

cramer

 

Jim Cramer is a co-founder of TheStreet and contributes daily market commentary to the financial news network's sites. Follow his trades for Action Alerts PLUS, which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust and is long FB.

 

 

  

More from TheStreet.com

Jul 17, 2013 6:00PM
avatar

thestreet logoIt's easy right now to get disillusioned with Yahoo (YHOO). The last thing you ever want to hear from a company is that numbers have to be taken down. But it sure isn't for lack of trying.

 

CEO Marissa Mayer has done an amazing job in one year's work. She inherited a company with terrible morale -- a company that was way off course and losing market share and relevancy to Google (GOOG) and Facebook (FB).


But she had one thing going for her: the balance sheet. It was pristine. It was better than that, actually. It was brimming with cash.

Pretty much everything, though, was going the wrong way. In a world where tech and the Internet are precisely at the point when the word "obsolete" has turned into its most violent and disruptive form of verb, Yahoo was about to be "obsoleted."

 

So, if the company had to guide down, what's so amazing about what Mayer has done? I think it is threefold:

 

1. She's turned around declining page views. Unless you have been in this game for a while, you have no idea how hard that is to do. She's doing it via improved content, including some expensive content -- more on that in a moment -- as well as tack-on, acquisitions and some improvement in the experience. This is the kind of improvement we are more used to seeing from her predecessor company, Google, than from this one.

 

2. For ages, Yahoo was infamous for losing any employees who were any good. She has brought down the attrition rate by 59%, and 12% of the people whom she has hired are "boomerangs" -- typically talented, disaffected people who want back in because they've heard good things about what Mayer is doing. That's even as we know she promulgated "no right to work" rules -- meaning you had to physically show up to keep your job. Yep, there were a lot of mail-it-inners at the company 366 days ago. There aren't anymore.

 

3. She drastically reoriented the company toward mobile. If you think Facebook didn't have a good mobile strategy a year ago, consider that Yahoo didn't even have many engineers associated with mobile. "Dozens" was the word she used. Now there are hundreds: a sixfold increase.

 

She did all of this without dinging the balance sheet at all on the way to shrinking the shares outstanding from 1.4 billion in 2009 to 1 billion today. She still has $4.8 billion in cash, and a lot more monetizable firepower behind it.


Marissa Mayer on NBC News' 'Today' show on Feb. 20, 2013 (© Peter Kramer/NBC/NBC NewsWire via Getty Images)But there was one line in the call -- actually one word in the call -- that created the hush and then brought on the sell: "programmatic." That's a method of allocating advertising dollars that has swept an industry with too much inventory, and it is sucking all of the margin out of display ads. Gone are the days in "journalism" -- if that's what you want to call a lot of content on Yahoo and other sites around the Web -- when there was a finite amount of copy against which to advertise. In a world where 250,000 blogs are started each day at Yahoo's Tumblr division -- in a world where content is not only not king but even pawn -- you need machines to figure out where to get your best eyeballs.

 

Wanting your ads placed to the right copy, and being willing to pay a premium for it, used to be the bedrock of journalism. That whole idea is now gone. Algorithms tell you where to place those ads. You don't do precision daylight bombing, either. You carpet bomb with machines. While you may end up bombing some places you don't need to reach, you get the job done at a much lower cost, and a much lower profit for those purveying the content.

 

So display ads were "challenged." What about the new page views? Yahoo has "yet to translate into revenue growth."

 

I don't know how it will. Because the money you get for advertising has to come from somewhere non-programmatic. It has to be somewhere that has truly proprietary non-replicable content. A good example is the "Saturday Night Live" deal that everyone was so gaga about on the on-call: old material that is proprietary enough that advertisers might like it.

 

How important is this to Yahoo? There is an incredible mismatch between a lack of video -- which you can still get good rates against -- and what the advertisers want from Yahoo. I think that might be the surest way to reverse this trend, but we can't be sure. With programmatic buying, who knows?

So, despite all of those good works, the stock is going down because its competitors, Google and Facebook, are ahead of Yahoo in trying to cover their flanks against this kind of buying. Google does it in search, while Facebook does it in novel ways to get eyeballs and a plethora of users, including mobile users -- double the number of overall eyeballs that Yahoo has.

 

Now here's the toughest part. You had to bet, with Mayer, that she would solve the basic problems of Yahoo when she took the job last year -- and she has done so. That's points one, two and three above, which she solved without really denting the cash hoard.

 

Now you have to bet with her that she'll solve the programmatic challenge and grow revenue. I was quite confident that she would fulfill miracles one, two and three.

 

I am not going to bet against her now. She has the smarts. She has the firepower.

 

She'll figure it out.

 

I get the profit-taking. But a big selloff? That means you should buy it, not sell it.

 

cramer

 

Jim Cramer is a co-founder of TheStreet and contributes daily market commentary to the financial news network's sites. Follow his trades for Action Alerts PLUS, which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust and is long FB.

 

 

  

More from TheStreet.com

Jul 17, 2013 4:44PM
avatar

thestreet logoIt's easy right now to get disillusioned with Yahoo (YHOO). The last thing you ever want to hear from a company is that numbers have to be taken down. But it sure isn't for lack of trying.

 

CEO Marissa Mayer has done an amazing job in one year's work. She inherited a company with terrible morale -- a company that was way off course and losing market share and relevancy to Google (GOOG) and Facebook (FB).


But she had one thing going for her: the balance sheet. It was pristine. It was better than that, actually. It was brimming with cash.

Pretty much everything, though, was going the wrong way. In a world where tech and the Internet are precisely at the point when the word "obsolete" has turned into its most violent and disruptive form of verb, Yahoo was about to be "obsoleted."

 

So, if the company had to guide down, what's so amazing about what Mayer has done? I think it is threefold:

 

1. She's turned around declining page views. Unless you have been in this game for a while, you have no idea how hard that is to do. She's doing it via improved content, including some expensive content -- more on that in a moment -- as well as tack-on, acquisitions and some improvement in the experience. This is the kind of improvement we are more used to seeing from her predecessor company, Google, than from this one.

 

2. For ages, Yahoo was infamous for losing any employees who were any good. She has brought down the attrition rate by 59%, and 12% of the people whom she has hired are "boomerangs" -- typically talented, disaffected people who want back in because they've heard good things about what Mayer is doing. That's even as we know she promulgated "no right to work" rules -- meaning you had to physically show up to keep your job. Yep, there were a lot of mail-it-inners at the company 366 days ago. There aren't anymore.

 

3. She drastically reoriented the company toward mobile. If you think Facebook didn't have a good mobile strategy a year ago, consider that Yahoo didn't even have many engineers associated with mobile. "Dozens" was the word she used. Now there are hundreds: a sixfold increase.

 

She did all of this without dinging the balance sheet at all on the way to shrinking the shares outstanding from 1.4 billion in 2009 to 1 billion today. She still has $4.8 billion in cash, and a lot more monetizable firepower behind it.


Marissa Mayer on NBC News' 'Today' show on Feb. 20, 2013 (© Peter Kramer/NBC/NBC NewsWire via Getty Images)But there was one line in the call -- actually one word in the call -- that created the hush and then brought on the sell: "programmatic." That's a method of allocating advertising dollars that has swept an industry with too much inventory, and it is sucking all of the margin out of display ads. Gone are the days in "journalism" -- if that's what you want to call a lot of content on Yahoo and other sites around the Web -- when there was a finite amount of copy against which to advertise. In a world where 250,000 blogs are started each day at Yahoo's Tumblr division -- in a world where content is not only not king but even pawn -- you need machines to figure out where to get your best eyeballs.

 

Wanting your ads placed to the right copy, and being willing to pay a premium for it, used to be the bedrock of journalism. That whole idea is now gone. Algorithms tell you where to place those ads. You don't do precision daylight bombing, either. You carpet bomb with machines. While you may end up bombing some places you don't need to reach, you get the job done at a much lower cost, and a much lower profit for those purveying the content.

 

So display ads were "challenged." What about the new page views? Yahoo has "yet to translate into revenue growth."

 

I don't know how it will. Because the money you get for advertising has to come from somewhere non-programmatic. It has to be somewhere that has truly proprietary non-replicable content. A good example is the "Saturday Night Live" deal that everyone was so gaga about on the on-call: old material that is proprietary enough that advertisers might like it.

 

How important is this to Yahoo? There is an incredible mismatch between a lack of video -- which you can still get good rates against -- and what the advertisers want from Yahoo. I think that might be the surest way to reverse this trend, but we can't be sure. With programmatic buying, who knows?

So, despite all of those good works, the stock is going down because its competitors, Google and Facebook, are ahead of Yahoo in trying to cover their flanks against this kind of buying. Google does it in search, while Facebook does it in novel ways to get eyeballs and a plethora of users, including mobile users -- double the number of overall eyeballs that Yahoo has.

 

Now here's the toughest part. You had to bet, with Mayer, that she would solve the basic problems of Yahoo when she took the job last year -- and she has done so. That's points one, two and three above, which she solved without really denting the cash hoard.

 

Now you have to bet with her that she'll solve the programmatic challenge and grow revenue. I was quite confident that she would fulfill miracles one, two and three.

 

I am not going to bet against her now. She has the smarts. She has the firepower.

 

She'll figure it out.

 

I get the profit-taking. But a big selloff? That means you should buy it, not sell it.

 

cramer

 

Jim Cramer is a co-founder of TheStreet and contributes daily market commentary to the financial news network's sites. Follow his trades for Action Alerts PLUS, which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust and is long FB.

 

 

  

More from TheStreet.com

Jul 17, 2013 4:15PM
avatar

thestreet logoIt's easy right now to get disillusioned with Yahoo (YHOO). The last thing you ever want to hear from a company is that numbers have to be taken down. But it sure isn't for lack of trying.

 

CEO Marissa Mayer has done an amazing job in one year's work. She inherited a company with terrible morale -- a company that was way off course and losing market share and relevancy to Google (GOOG) and Facebook (FB).


But she had one thing going for her: the balance sheet. It was pristine. It was better than that, actually. It was brimming with cash.

Pretty much everything, though, was going the wrong way. In a world where tech and the Internet are precisely at the point when the word "obsolete" has turned into its most violent and disruptive form of verb, Yahoo was about to be "obsoleted."

 

So, if the company had to guide down, what's so amazing about what Mayer has done? I think it is threefold:

 

1. She's turned around declining page views. Unless you have been in this game for a while, you have no idea how hard that is to do. She's doing it via improved content, including some expensive content -- more on that in a moment -- as well as tack-on, acquisitions and some improvement in the experience. This is the kind of improvement we are more used to seeing from her predecessor company, Google, than from this one.

 

2. For ages, Yahoo was infamous for losing any employees who were any good. She has brought down the attrition rate by 59%, and 12% of the people whom she has hired are "boomerangs" -- typically talented, disaffected people who want back in because they've heard good things about what Mayer is doing. That's even as we know she promulgated "no right to work" rules -- meaning you had to physically show up to keep your job. Yep, there were a lot of mail-it-inners at the company 366 days ago. There aren't anymore.

 

3. She drastically reoriented the company toward mobile. If you think Facebook didn't have a good mobile strategy a year ago, consider that Yahoo didn't even have many engineers associated with mobile. "Dozens" was the word she used. Now there are hundreds: a sixfold increase.

 

She did all of this without dinging the balance sheet at all on the way to shrinking the shares outstanding from 1.4 billion in 2009 to 1 billion today. She still has $4.8 billion in cash, and a lot more monetizable firepower behind it.


Marissa Mayer on NBC News' 'Today' show on Feb. 20, 2013 (© Peter Kramer/NBC/NBC NewsWire via Getty Images)But there was one line in the call -- actually one word in the call -- that created the hush and then brought on the sell: "programmatic." That's a method of allocating advertising dollars that has swept an industry with too much inventory, and it is sucking all of the margin out of display ads. Gone are the days in "journalism" -- if that's what you want to call a lot of content on Yahoo and other sites around the Web -- when there was a finite amount of copy against which to advertise. In a world where 250,000 blogs are started each day at Yahoo's Tumblr division -- in a world where content is not only not king but even pawn -- you need machines to figure out where to get your best eyeballs.

 

Wanting your ads placed to the right copy, and being willing to pay a premium for it, used to be the bedrock of journalism. That whole idea is now gone. Algorithms tell you where to place those ads. You don't do precision daylight bombing, either. You carpet bomb with machines. While you may end up bombing some places you don't need to reach, you get the job done at a much lower cost, and a much lower profit for those purveying the content.

 

So display ads were "challenged." What about the new page views? Yahoo has "yet to translate into revenue growth."

 

I don't know how it will. Because the money you get for advertising has to come from somewhere non-programmatic. It has to be somewhere that has truly proprietary non-replicable content. A good example is the "Saturday Night Live" deal that everyone was so gaga about on the on-call: old material that is proprietary enough that advertisers might like it.

 

How important is this to Yahoo? There is an incredible mismatch between a lack of video -- which you can still get good rates against -- and what the advertisers want from Yahoo. I think that might be the surest way to reverse this trend, but we can't be sure. With programmatic buying, who knows?

So, despite all of those good works, the stock is going down because its competitors, Google and Facebook, are ahead of Yahoo in trying to cover their flanks against this kind of buying. Google does it in search, while Facebook does it in novel ways to get eyeballs and a plethora of users, including mobile users -- double the number of overall eyeballs that Yahoo has.

 

Now here's the toughest part. You had to bet, with Mayer, that she would solve the basic problems of Yahoo when she took the job last year -- and she has done so. That's points one, two and three above, which she solved without really denting the cash hoard.

 

Now you have to bet with her that she'll solve the programmatic challenge and grow revenue. I was quite confident that she would fulfill miracles one, two and three.

 

I am not going to bet against her now. She has the smarts. She has the firepower.

 

She'll figure it out.

 

I get the profit-taking. But a big selloff? That means you should buy it, not sell it.

 

cramer

 

Jim Cramer is a co-founder of TheStreet and contributes daily market commentary to the financial news network's sites. Follow his trades for Action Alerts PLUS, which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust and is long FB.

 

 

  

More from TheStreet.com

Jul 17, 2013 4:04PM
avatar

thestreet logoIt's easy right now to get disillusioned with Yahoo (YHOO). The last thing you ever want to hear from a company is that numbers have to be taken down. But it sure isn't for lack of trying.

 

CEO Marissa Mayer has done an amazing job in one year's work. She inherited a company with terrible morale -- a company that was way off course and losing market share and relevancy to Google (GOOG) and Facebook (FB).


But she had one thing going for her: the balance sheet. It was pristine. It was better than that, actually. It was brimming with cash.

Pretty much everything, though, was going the wrong way. In a world where tech and the Internet are precisely at the point when the word "obsolete" has turned into its most violent and disruptive form of verb, Yahoo was about to be "obsoleted."

 

So, if the company had to guide down, what's so amazing about what Mayer has done? I think it is threefold:

 

1. She's turned around declining page views. Unless you have been in this game for a while, you have no idea how hard that is to do. She's doing it via improved content, including some expensive content -- more on that in a moment -- as well as tack-on, acquisitions and some improvement in the experience. This is the kind of improvement we are more used to seeing from her predecessor company, Google, than from this one.

 

2. For ages, Yahoo was infamous for losing any employees who were any good. She has brought down the attrition rate by 59%, and 12% of the people whom she has hired are "boomerangs" -- typically talented, disaffected people who want back in because they've heard good things about what Mayer is doing. That's even as we know she promulgated "no right to work" rules -- meaning you had to physically show up to keep your job. Yep, there were a lot of mail-it-inners at the company 366 days ago. There aren't anymore.

 

3. She drastically reoriented the company toward mobile. If you think Facebook didn't have a good mobile strategy a year ago, consider that Yahoo didn't even have many engineers associated with mobile. "Dozens" was the word she used. Now there are hundreds: a sixfold increase.

 

She did all of this without dinging the balance sheet at all on the way to shrinking the shares outstanding from 1.4 billion in 2009 to 1 billion today. She still has $4.8 billion in cash, and a lot more monetizable firepower behind it.


Marissa Mayer on NBC News' 'Today' show on Feb. 20, 2013 (© Peter Kramer/NBC/NBC NewsWire via Getty Images)But there was one line in the call -- actually one word in the call -- that created the hush and then brought on the sell: "programmatic." That's a method of allocating advertising dollars that has swept an industry with too much inventory, and it is sucking all of the margin out of display ads. Gone are the days in "journalism" -- if that's what you want to call a lot of content on Yahoo and other sites around the Web -- when there was a finite amount of copy against which to advertise. In a world where 250,000 blogs are started each day at Yahoo's Tumblr division -- in a world where content is not only not king but even pawn -- you need machines to figure out where to get your best eyeballs.

 

Wanting your ads placed to the right copy, and being willing to pay a premium for it, used to be the bedrock of journalism. That whole idea is now gone. Algorithms tell you where to place those ads. You don't do precision daylight bombing, either. You carpet bomb with machines. While you may end up bombing some places you don't need to reach, you get the job done at a much lower cost, and a much lower profit for those purveying the content.

 

So display ads were "challenged." What about the new page views? Yahoo has "yet to translate into revenue growth."

 

I don't know how it will. Because the money you get for advertising has to come from somewhere non-programmatic. It has to be somewhere that has truly proprietary non-replicable content. A good example is the "Saturday Night Live" deal that everyone was so gaga about on the on-call: old material that is proprietary enough that advertisers might like it.

 

How important is this to Yahoo? There is an incredible mismatch between a lack of video -- which you can still get good rates against -- and what the advertisers want from Yahoo. I think that might be the surest way to reverse this trend, but we can't be sure. With programmatic buying, who knows?

So, despite all of those good works, the stock is going down because its competitors, Google and Facebook, are ahead of Yahoo in trying to cover their flanks against this kind of buying. Google does it in search, while Facebook does it in novel ways to get eyeballs and a plethora of users, including mobile users -- double the number of overall eyeballs that Yahoo has.

 

Now here's the toughest part. You had to bet, with Mayer, that she would solve the basic problems of Yahoo when she took the job last year -- and she has done so. That's points one, two and three above, which she solved without really denting the cash hoard.

 

Now you have to bet with her that she'll solve the programmatic challenge and grow revenue. I was quite confident that she would fulfill miracles one, two and three.

 

I am not going to bet against her now. She has the smarts. She has the firepower.

 

She'll figure it out.

 

I get the profit-taking. But a big selloff? That means you should buy it, not sell it.

 

cramer

 

Jim Cramer is a co-founder of TheStreet and contributes daily market commentary to the financial news network's sites. Follow his trades for Action Alerts PLUS, which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust and is long FB.

 

 

  

More from TheStreet.com

Jul 17, 2013 2:42PM
avatar

thestreet logoIt's easy right now to get disillusioned with Yahoo (YHOO). The last thing you ever want to hear from a company is that numbers have to be taken down. But it sure isn't for lack of trying.

 

CEO Marissa Mayer has done an amazing job in one year's work. She inherited a company with terrible morale -- a company that was way off course and losing market share and relevancy to Google (GOOG) and Facebook (FB).


But she had one thing going for her: the balance sheet. It was pristine. It was better than that, actually. It was brimming with cash.

Pretty much everything, though, was going the wrong way. In a world where tech and the Internet are precisely at the point when the word "obsolete" has turned into its most violent and disruptive form of verb, Yahoo was about to be "obsoleted."

 

So, if the company had to guide down, what's so amazing about what Mayer has done? I think it is threefold:

 

1. She's turned around declining page views. Unless you have been in this game for a while, you have no idea how hard that is to do. She's doing it via improved content, including some expensive content -- more on that in a moment -- as well as tack-on, acquisitions and some improvement in the experience. This is the kind of improvement we are more used to seeing from her predecessor company, Google, than from this one.

 

2. For ages, Yahoo was infamous for losing any employees who were any good. She has brought down the attrition rate by 59%, and 12% of the people whom she has hired are "boomerangs" -- typically talented, disaffected people who want back in because they've heard good things about what Mayer is doing. That's even as we know she promulgated "no right to work" rules -- meaning you had to physically show up to keep your job. Yep, there were a lot of mail-it-inners at the company 366 days ago. There aren't anymore.

 

3. She drastically reoriented the company toward mobile. If you think Facebook didn't have a good mobile strategy a year ago, consider that Yahoo didn't even have many engineers associated with mobile. "Dozens" was the word she used. Now there are hundreds: a sixfold increase.

 

She did all of this without dinging the balance sheet at all on the way to shrinking the shares outstanding from 1.4 billion in 2009 to 1 billion today. She still has $4.8 billion in cash, and a lot more monetizable firepower behind it.


Marissa Mayer on NBC News' 'Today' show on Feb. 20, 2013 (© Peter Kramer/NBC/NBC NewsWire via Getty Images)But there was one line in the call -- actually one word in the call -- that created the hush and then brought on the sell: "programmatic." That's a method of allocating advertising dollars that has swept an industry with too much inventory, and it is sucking all of the margin out of display ads. Gone are the days in "journalism" -- if that's what you want to call a lot of content on Yahoo and other sites around the Web -- when there was a finite amount of copy against which to advertise. In a world where 250,000 blogs are started each day at Yahoo's Tumblr division -- in a world where content is not only not king but even pawn -- you need machines to figure out where to get your best eyeballs.

 

Wanting your ads placed to the right copy, and being willing to pay a premium for it, used to be the bedrock of journalism. That whole idea is now gone. Algorithms tell you where to place those ads. You don't do precision daylight bombing, either. You carpet bomb with machines. While you may end up bombing some places you don't need to reach, you get the job done at a much lower cost, and a much lower profit for those purveying the content.

 

So display ads were "challenged." What about the new page views? Yahoo has "yet to translate into revenue growth."

 

I don't know how it will. Because the money you get for advertising has to come from somewhere non-programmatic. It has to be somewhere that has truly proprietary non-replicable content. A good example is the "Saturday Night Live" deal that everyone was so gaga about on the on-call: old material that is proprietary enough that advertisers might like it.

 

How important is this to Yahoo? There is an incredible mismatch between a lack of video -- which you can still get good rates against -- and what the advertisers want from Yahoo. I think that might be the surest way to reverse this trend, but we can't be sure. With programmatic buying, who knows?

So, despite all of those good works, the stock is going down because its competitors, Google and Facebook, are ahead of Yahoo in trying to cover their flanks against this kind of buying. Google does it in search, while Facebook does it in novel ways to get eyeballs and a plethora of users, including mobile users -- double the number of overall eyeballs that Yahoo has.

 

Now here's the toughest part. You had to bet, with Mayer, that she would solve the basic problems of Yahoo when she took the job last year -- and she has done so. That's points one, two and three above, which she solved without really denting the cash hoard.

 

Now you have to bet with her that she'll solve the programmatic challenge and grow revenue. I was quite confident that she would fulfill miracles one, two and three.

 

I am not going to bet against her now. She has the smarts. She has the firepower.

 

She'll figure it out.

 

I get the profit-taking. But a big selloff? That means you should buy it, not sell it.

 

cramer

 

Jim Cramer is a co-founder of TheStreet and contributes daily market commentary to the financial news network's sites. Follow his trades for Action Alerts PLUS, which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust and is long FB.

 

 

  

More from TheStreet.com

Jul 17, 2013 1:36PM
avatar

thestreet logoIt's easy right now to get disillusioned with Yahoo (YHOO). The last thing you ever want to hear from a company is that numbers have to be taken down. But it sure isn't for lack of trying.

 

CEO Marissa Mayer has done an amazing job in one year's work. She inherited a company with terrible morale -- a company that was way off course and losing market share and relevancy to Google (GOOG) and Facebook (FB).


But she had one thing going for her: the balance sheet. It was pristine. It was better than that, actually. It was brimming with cash.

Pretty much everything, though, was going the wrong way. In a world where tech and the Internet are precisely at the point when the word "obsolete" has turned into its most violent and disruptive form of verb, Yahoo was about to be "obsoleted."

 

So, if the company had to guide down, what's so amazing about what Mayer has done? I think it is threefold:

 

1. She's turned around declining page views. Unless you have been in this game for a while, you have no idea how hard that is to do. She's doing it via improved content, including some expensive content -- more on that in a moment -- as well as tack-on, acquisitions and some improvement in the experience. This is the kind of improvement we are more used to seeing from her predecessor company, Google, than from this one.

 

2. For ages, Yahoo was infamous for losing any employees who were any good. She has brought down the attrition rate by 59%, and 12% of the people whom she has hired are "boomerangs" -- typically talented, disaffected people who want back in because they've heard good things about what Mayer is doing. That's even as we know she promulgated "no right to work" rules -- meaning you had to physically show up to keep your job. Yep, there were a lot of mail-it-inners at the company 366 days ago. There aren't anymore.

 

3. She drastically reoriented the company toward mobile. If you think Facebook didn't have a good mobile strategy a year ago, consider that Yahoo didn't even have many engineers associated with mobile. "Dozens" was the word she used. Now there are hundreds: a sixfold increase.

 

She did all of this without dinging the balance sheet at all on the way to shrinking the shares outstanding from 1.4 billion in 2009 to 1 billion today. She still has $4.8 billion in cash, and a lot more monetizable firepower behind it.


Marissa Mayer on NBC News' 'Today' show on Feb. 20, 2013 (© Peter Kramer/NBC/NBC NewsWire via Getty Images)But there was one line in the call -- actually one word in the call -- that created the hush and then brought on the sell: "programmatic." That's a method of allocating advertising dollars that has swept an industry with too much inventory, and it is sucking all of the margin out of display ads. Gone are the days in "journalism" -- if that's what you want to call a lot of content on Yahoo and other sites around the Web -- when there was a finite amount of copy against which to advertise. In a world where 250,000 blogs are started each day at Yahoo's Tumblr division -- in a world where content is not only not king but even pawn -- you need machines to figure out where to get your best eyeballs.

 

Wanting your ads placed to the right copy, and being willing to pay a premium for it, used to be the bedrock of journalism. That whole idea is now gone. Algorithms tell you where to place those ads. You don't do precision daylight bombing, either. You carpet bomb with machines. While you may end up bombing some places you don't need to reach, you get the job done at a much lower cost, and a much lower profit for those purveying the content.

 

So display ads were "challenged." What about the new page views? Yahoo has "yet to translate into revenue growth."

 

I don't know how it will. Because the money you get for advertising has to come from somewhere non-programmatic. It has to be somewhere that has truly proprietary non-replicable content. A good example is the "Saturday Night Live" deal that everyone was so gaga about on the on-call: old material that is proprietary enough that advertisers might like it.

 

How important is this to Yahoo? There is an incredible mismatch between a lack of video -- which you can still get good rates against -- and what the advertisers want from Yahoo. I think that might be the surest way to reverse this trend, but we can't be sure. With programmatic buying, who knows?

So, despite all of those good works, the stock is going down because its competitors, Google and Facebook, are ahead of Yahoo in trying to cover their flanks against this kind of buying. Google does it in search, while Facebook does it in novel ways to get eyeballs and a plethora of users, including mobile users -- double the number of overall eyeballs that Yahoo has.

 

Now here's the toughest part. You had to bet, with Mayer, that she would solve the basic problems of Yahoo when she took the job last year -- and she has done so. That's points one, two and three above, which she solved without really denting the cash hoard.

 

Now you have to bet with her that she'll solve the programmatic challenge and grow revenue. I was quite confident that she would fulfill miracles one, two and three.

 

I am not going to bet against her now. She has the smarts. She has the firepower.

 

She'll figure it out.

 

I get the profit-taking. But a big selloff? That means you should buy it, not sell it.

 

cramer

 

Jim Cramer is a co-founder of TheStreet and contributes daily market commentary to the financial news network's sites. Follow his trades for Action Alerts PLUS, which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust and is long FB.

 

 

  

More from TheStreet.com

Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

DATA PROVIDERS

Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.

STOCK SCOUTER

StockScouter rates stocks from 1 to 10, with 10 being the best, using a system of advanced mathematics to determine a stock's expected risk and return. Ratings are displayed on a bell curve, meaning there will be fewer ratings of 1 and 10 and far more of 4 through 7.

122
122 rated 1
288
288 rated 2
472
472 rated 3
638
638 rated 4
628
628 rated 5
704
704 rated 6
609
609 rated 7
489
489 rated 8
275
275 rated 9
129
129 rated 10
12345678910

Top Picks

SYMBOLNAMERATING
AAPLAPPLE Inc10
ATVIACTIVISION BLIZZARD Inc10
CTSHCOGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS10
FOXATWENTY-FIRST CENTURY FOX Inc CLASS A10
ITUBITAU UNIBANCO BANCO MULTIPLO S.A.10
More

VIDEO ON MSN MONEY

ABOUT

Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.

Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.

Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.