US Bancorp making its way to $40
With the bank's 14% return on equity, these shares still look cheap.
For more than a year I've sung the praises of U.S. Bancorp's (USB) consistent operational performance, which in my opinion had gone underappreciated (TheStreet) by investors who were more enamored with growth.
I won't disagree there's considerably more "flair" associated with the likes of Bank of America (BAC) and Citigroup (C). But they also come with an equal amount of risk. I don't believe in substituting "high profile" for fundamental metrics such as operating margin, earnings per share and return on equity -- areas where U.S. Bancorp has consistently outperformed. After another solid earnings report, shares of this bank still look cheap.
After studying the results of the "big four" banks (TheStreet), which include JPMorgan Chase (JPM) and Wells Fargo (WFC), it became clear that revenue growth was a struggle across the entire sector (TheStreet).
So it came as no surprise that U.S. Bancorp posted a 2.4% revenue decline. Relative to expectations, I would say the performance wasn't that bad, especially since the bank improved revenue by 1.5% sequentially, which was on par with both Citigroup and JPMorgan.
As with Bank of America and Wells Fargo, U.S. Bancorp seemed to have had a hard time this quarter with mortgage lending, which led to slight decline in net interest income (NII). But unlike Bank of America, which posted 4% decline in fees, U.S. Bancorp was able to offset its net interest income weakness with a 5% sequential increase in fees.
What's more, amid a highly competitive banking market where everyone is scrounging for loan growth, it should not be taken for granted that U.S. Bancorp was able to post 5.2% year-over-year growth in average total loans, which grew by more than $11 billion. That number is 2% better when excluding covered loans on the bank's run-off portfolio.
What this tells me is that U.S. Bancorp is doing better than just holding its own against Bank of America and JPMorgan in commercial lending, which grew 11% year over year. If there was any cause for concern or a minor red flag, I would point to the 4% sequential increase in operating expenses, which missed Wall Street expectations.
I believe the higher expenses was one of the reasons that caused the 2% decline in net interest income, which was below expectations. In the "too big to fail era," any time bank expenses rise it becomes a big deal, especially with stricter federal regulation ensuring banks are able to meet their capital requirements. In this case, I don't believe this is a situation where U.S. Bancorp management is getting careless.
I'm not going to make excuses for the bank's miss of 3 cents on expenses. But given that U.S. Bancorp still maintained a solid efficiency ratio of 52%, which is better than Wells Fargo's 57% and JPMorgan's 59%, I wouldn't get carried away. The lower the number, the stronger the bank is perceived to be. So, here too, U.S. Bancorp is demonstrating that it just might be safer than two of the better names on the market.
Besides, given how competitive this sector has become, I don't see a scenario where U.S. Bancorp management could have grown average loans by more than 5% without having made some investments. Plus, the fact the bank still managed to meet expectations in net interest margin should negate any near-term worries about its capital-use efficiency.
All told, it was not great a quarter, but it was solid enough to affirm that management has strong focus on the bank's direction. Plus, I don't believe there were any breathtaking performances from within this sector, anyways -- even from the "big four." For U.S. Bancorp, l believe there will be more growth opportunities ahead. The question is to what extent management is willing to go to produce the level of growth that investors crave.
I'm not going to assume that growth will be free, which means expenses are likely to rise. For now I will say that I like the progress that U.S. Bancorp has made. With the bank's strong reputation for return on equity, which currently stands at 14%, these shares still look cheap. Until something changes, I'm going to stick with my price target of $40, which I originally set in April.
At the time of publication, the author held no position in any of the stocks mentioned.
More from TheStreet.com
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
Serious issues like drought and the deterioration of the developed world spell opportunity for this industry leader.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.
Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.
Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.