Why US Airways-American merger isn't too big
The proposed $11 billion deal would ultimately benefit consumers, analyst says.
Despite allegations in a Justice Department lawsuit, the proposed $11 billion merger between US Airways (LCC) and American Airlines would ultimately benefit consumers by providing increased access to underserved markets, an aviation industry strategic consultant told CNBC on Wednesday.
"Both airlines are healthy, but they could be a lot healthier put together," Michael Boyd, chairman at the Boyd Group, said on CNBC's "Squawk Box."
He said the issue with the merger is "not so much competition," because airlines will be reducing capacity regardless, but rather that it would provide access to underserved airports.
"There are four dozen small communities that will get American Airlines branded service out of this deal. That gives them access to the rest of the world, a whole lot better than today," he said. "Overall, would the consumer be better off as a result of this? I think the answer is yes. Will fares go up? Bank on it. They are going to go up regardless."
In a lawsuit on Tuesday, the Justice Department said the deal would result in the creation of the world's largest airline and that a combination of the two companies would reduce competition for commercial air travel in local markets and would result in passengers paying higher airfares and receive less service.
When asked about the potential near-monopoly that a combined US Airways/AMR would have at certain airports, including Washington's Reagan National Airport, Boyd said access also would be limited if the new company were forced to sell its position to other carriers.
"That means Bangor, Maine, will lose service to Washington National because those [carriers like Jet Blue (JBLU) and Southwest (LUV)] don't have the equipment that can serve Bangor. That means places like Sarasota will lose service," he added. "Smaller communities will get shafted by that kind of a divestiture at this point."
Increased access, he said, is more important than lower prices, because additional access will create jobs and better serve communities that would otherwise be missed. "We're beyond the point of hoping to get low, affordable air fares," he said.
"I hate mergers," he said. "But this sort of thing, right now, in terms of business for small communities, it pains me to say it, but this merger would be good for that."
More from CNBC
Let the economy decide! When fares get to high an opportunity for a start up airline begins. All this crap about to big to fail BS! There will always be someone or an entity to replace the either failed company or the company that has prices so high a cometitor can come in and make him competative, assuming the government doesn't step in and favor the big guy.
It's called a free market!
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
The solid report comes a month after the retailer closed all of its Canadian operations.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.
Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.
Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.