Will the shutdown become an earnings scapegoat?

The closure may give executives a way to play down other headwinds hampering their ability to deliver growth.

By The Fiscal Times Oct 25, 2013 2:43PM
Image: Dollar bills floating over U.S. Capitol © CorbisBy Suzanne McGeeThe Fiscal Times logo

For most of the year, analysts have been promising us that the slow rate of growth in corporate profits in the first six months of 2013 would be more than offset by stronger earnings in the second half of the year, thanks to what they confidently assured would be a strengthening economy.

Whoops.

By the end of the third quarter, analysts (as calculated by Thomson Reuters) were predicting earnings growth would be a mere 4.8 percent, well below the 8.5 percent growth they had predicted earlier in the year. That’s about where the forecasts stand today -- as long as you exclude JPMorgan Chase (JPM) from the calculation. Once you add their big loss to the mix, the figure falls to only 2.3 percent.

This leaves the markets with a big conundrum. On the one hand, stocks have rallied tremendously this year, gaining about 23 percent. On the other, earnings growth hasn’t kept pace, stuck at around the 4 percent level and, even if we see a blockbuster fourth quarter, is likely to remain in that range for the year as a whole.

That means that the market rally has been in large part because investors are willing to pay more for every dollar in corporate earnings: The S&P 500 now trades at a whopping 19.5 times reported profits in the previous 12 months, significantly above the 15 times earnings that represents the long-term valuation norm.

That was just fine and dandy, as long as the forecast that earnings would see big gains seemed reasonable. In the absence of the second-half rebound in profits, however, it’s more questionable.

A new round in the blame game
Sometimes, companies cite logical and reasonable reasons for why they can’t deliver the kind of profits they had promised their investors. A case in point is Europe’s recent economic meltdown. Companies like Starbucks (SBUX) that had pushed forward with expansion plans in Europe suddenly found themselves with new fixed costs and a slump in demand as cash-strapped Europeans dialed back their discretionary spending. That’s a no-brainer.

In other cases, companies playing the “blame game” have raised more than a few eyebrows. Back in the 1990s, the O.J. Simpson trial was blamed by a handful of companies: Apparently, people spent so much time glued to their television screens, they weren’t shopping enough. Weather that is too bad – cold or rainy, keeping people indoors – or too good, tempting folks to hang out in their backyards rather than head to the mall, is often cited by retailers, even those whose fashion offerings may be off-trend and more to blame for a slip-up in sales or profits.

Go back to 2007 and you’ll see what I mean. Back then, the subprime crisis was already gripping the financial sector, and sure enough, affecting earnings, with Merrill Lynch writing down its inventory of subprime mortgages. It was a little odd, however, to see IBM blame what was happening to its financial services customers for the fact that its hardware sales didn’t measure up to expectations, even though its overall profits rose significantly more than did most of its peers in the S&P 500 index. And was the subprime credit crunch really responsible for a crunch in profit margins at Hershey? Certainly, the candy company seemed to want to convince investors that it was, arguing that its distributors placed fewer orders because rising interest rates made holding inventories more expensive.

Just under half of the companies in the S&P 500 have reported their third-quarter results so far, and already we've heard companies as varied as Citigroup (C), Linear Technology (LLTC) and Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) blame the dysfunction in Washington for an actual shortfall in earnings or a possible earnings "miss" in the fourth quarter. In an interview with CNBC, Southwest Airlines (LUV) CEO Gary Kelly tempered expectations for revenues in October, saying he expected an increase, but "not as high as it would have been had the government not shut down."

"Consumers were out there buying and flying," Kelly said. "We were having a grand time until the government shut down in October, but we're still looking at a very good fourth quarter."

Delta Air Lines (DAL) President Ed Bastian this week told analysts that holiday bookings look strong, but that the shutdown reduced revenue by up to $25 million. Costco (COST) CEO Richard Galanti, by contrast, said that the shutdown didn’t impact his company, other than to leave executives "scratching our heads in disbelief."

It’s logical that companies that rely heavily on government contracts (some defense contractors may fall into that group) may have felt the pinch of the shutdown, at least temporarily. But as with Hershey, this is a time to listen for attempts to play the “blame game.”

It’s a tough economic environment for many companies to generate attractive levels of earnings growth. And it’s hard for a CEO or CFO to stand up and say so: that they weren’t able to wave a magic wand and squeeze margins that extra little bit. But given the growth in the market price/earnings ratio, the need to reach a bit further in search of not just an excuse but a bona fide reason for an earnings disappointment or lackluster growth in either revenues or profits is going to prove tremendously tempting. Companies across the spectrum are going to want to defend their new, higher multiples.

Companies playing the "blame game" may not be trying to find a scapegoat; they may not be trying to distract us from some kind of fundamental weakness. They just may not want us to remember that the second-half rebound in earnings that analysts had promised has yet to materialize.

True, the shutdown hasn’t helped the economy: Millions of Americans, many of whom already lived paycheck to paycheck, were reminded once again of how suddenly their personal finances can teeter on the edge of disaster. It’s likely to take months for confidence to return, and in that time period, the willingness to spend heavily on big-ticket items is going to decline. That’s logical. So, too, is it logical that we may see some of that expansion in P/E reverse itself.

So, when you start hearing companies cite "the shutdown" as a reason for underwhelming earnings, be skeptical. The shutdown may well have affected their results, directly or indirectly. But maybe, just maybe, some of those companies see a convenient excuse and a way to play down other headwinds hampering their ability to deliver both quantity and quality earnings growth.

Suzanne McGee is a columnist at The Fiscal Times. Subscribe to The Fiscal Times' FREE newsletter.

More from The Fiscal Times

29Comments
Oct 25, 2013 3:44PM
avatar
The shutdown didn't occur until October which isn't in the 3rd quarter of 2013 last time I checked!
Oct 25, 2013 3:09PM
avatar
Welp, it's official, according to the Census, we have more people collecting welfare than we have working.

It seems the 47% deadbeat class has surpassed 50%.   I wonder if that is because we reward sloth and punish work?   I wonder how long it will be until near 100% live off the government and no one works or produces anything and we all become democrats...
Oct 25, 2013 8:39PM
avatar
Pretty sure out and out LOSERS can't stick a scapegoat with this. The markets are way too overdue for crashing and everyday of delay is another day of decay. Die already... you can't survive without QE.
Oct 26, 2013 1:05PM
avatar
It really doesn't matter! Computers are doing the buying and selling now!
Oct 26, 2013 9:54PM
avatar
Killing business and ignoring human beings dislike of phone menu (shunting) systems and other things along those lines would be a better bet on the earnings. Another turn-off can be companies who "politely" ask you to provide them with feedback. I feel like they are lazy and they want to save a buck, which in a way is very clever but if you look at some company's earnings, it also looks less than clever.
Oct 27, 2013 3:06AM
avatar
 Ever see any story about the debt? You know the one YOU owe? That is if your lucky enough to have a job under the Obozo lowest labor participation rate since 1978. Oh well it's only 123,000$ half of was created in ONLY 5 years of the great socialist blundering clown Obozo. But hay he fixed everything with "shovel ready jobs" and the looming unfunded 100 trillion of social socialist programs is fixed right? Why I can see how he so much time to run around the Nation flapping his gums with a bunch drooling stupid zombies in his presence. Debt welfare government jobs and funny Fed printing ROCKS you are brilliant democrats.
Oct 27, 2013 3:01PM
avatar
all the Good news -- QE3 ===   Wall street  down big time !!!  All the Bad news + QE3 ==  Wall street up big time... Small investors and retailers should remain out in this rallies because after real estate bubbles greedy big Finance cos. creating  stock markets bubble with their friend B.B's free moneys. 

Oct 27, 2013 12:01PM
Oct 25, 2013 6:57PM
avatar
Of the above there are two companies that we use frequently. Southwest, who keeps ordering new 737's from Boeing as well as opening new destinations and of course keeping fares low. Costco who keeps opening new stores and keeps prices affordable. Where I see some downturn is in flights during the holiday season because of another shutdown fear in January that will affect some incomes. As far as Costco, they will have another plus holiday season because of affordable merchandise. By the way, we use Southwest points for travel (no money) and we recently received our 2% yearly check back from Costco which more than paid our membership fee.
Oct 27, 2013 2:10PM
avatar

Well, if the Stock Market disconfirms any effect the Shutdown did not have on the financial markets then nothing but the continued FED asset purchasing matters. Right? Because according to the Stock Market the Shutdown was already "priced into" the fully manipulated and controlled markets. So, of course Wall Street can say "Shutdown? What Shutdown?"

 

All the more reason to be completely unconcerned about a sovereign debt default. The only thing that matters is an "untaper." Just have the FED issue a platinum card.

 

And why don't the financial markets really step up and demand that the FED just print-up $17-trillion (or whatever trillions are required) to make the national debt just go-away. And another thing: have the FED fully fund the government so we don't have these budget problems and debt ceiling problems anymore.

Oct 27, 2013 12:28AM
avatar
When you have the GOP working night and day to to kill any plan to grow are economy and create jobs, while threatening to destroy the world financial system every few months if they don't get their way, it radiates weakness and undermines confidence in our nation, which inevitably stunts the economy. When will the wacko birds on the right stop acting like children and work to repair the damage they have done ? whenarethejobs.com
Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

DATA PROVIDERS

Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.

STOCK SCOUTER

StockScouter rates stocks from 1 to 10, with 10 being the best, using a system of advanced mathematics to determine a stock's expected risk and return. Ratings are displayed on a bell curve, meaning there will be fewer ratings of 1 and 10 and far more of 4 through 7.

112
112 rated 1
288
288 rated 2
479
479 rated 3
645
645 rated 4
644
644 rated 5
653
653 rated 6
638
638 rated 7
483
483 rated 8
288
288 rated 9
123
123 rated 10
12345678910

Top Picks

SYMBOLNAMERATING
AAPLAPPLE Inc10
ATVIACTIVISION BLIZZARD Inc10
CTSHCOGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS10
FOXATWENTY-FIRST CENTURY FOX Inc CLASS A10
ITUBITAU UNIBANCO BANCO MULTIPLO S.A.10
More

VIDEO ON MSN MONEY

ABOUT

Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.

Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.

Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.