Can US defense stocks survive drastic budget cuts?
Despite the threat of sequestration, UBS is positive on some of the biggest defense contractors.
By Lee Jackson
If there is one thing a U.S. politician does not want to appear after the horror of 9/11, it is being weak on defense. Yet with the exception of entitlements, the biggest part of the U.S. government budget is spent each year on defending our nation.
With the looming budget cuts in the sequestration set for March 1, how will the largest U.S. defense companies dodge what appears to be inevitable changes in government spending?
Despite the rhetoric of the drastic budget cuts, outlays for the U.S. military and its modernization campaign actually grew by 10% in January. The Department of Defense reported that cash outlays came in at $19 billion, with funding for the Navy and the Air Force up 14% while Army expenditures declined by 3%.
According to the analysts at UBS A.G. (UBS), defense stocks are not reflecting a sequestration threat. While conventional wisdom seems to reflect the real possibility that most of the more draconian budget cuts will not survive, something has to give. So UBS analysts concentrated their research efforts to find the stocks with the least amount of budget risk.
Based on a lower risk profile and better opportunities for cost reduction, UBS is positive on General Dynamics Corp. (GD), Raytheon Co. (RTN), Alliant Techsystems Inc. (ATK) and, for European exposure, BAE Systems, which trades on the London Stock exchange.
While there is no question that the budget argument stays center stage for quite some time, the U.S. military is not in a position where it can fall behind in an ever-changing and increasingly dangerous world. No politician, regardless of party, wants to be branded with not supporting our troops and military. So while cuts will be made, they will be less about equipment and weapons and more about manpower and theaters of warfare.
More from 24/7 Wall St.
"If there is one thing a U.S. politician does not want to appear after the horror of 9/11, it is being weak on defense."
9/11 and defense? You got to be serious, 9/11 had nothing to do with defense, it was a bunch of religious fanatics that hate Christians and Jews welding box cutters. We've spent $1.4 trillion, $800 billion in Iraq and $600 billion in Afghan, destroying everything in sight. That's $6,363 over 10 years for each of our 220,000,000 taxpayers. We could of solved the problem in 15 minutes for a lot less money.
DEFENSE COMPANIES, Lemme see, YOU've got to be kidding ??
Name the last time an actual defense contractor, went out business..
Possibly merged with another ?
Cut backs or lay-offs ? That's just standard procedure.
But didn't close the doors or shutter the place.
Ma&Pa or small shops doing speciality work for Larger Contractors don't count.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
Tighter regulations and the end of a lengthy bull market in bonds have changed the landscape forever.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.
Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.
Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.