History suggests stocks have room to run
Stocks jumped more than 3% on Wednesday. That's a rare event that suggests more gains are ahead.
Stocks have had a good week after posting a big 3.1% rebound on Wednesday. The action was impressive. And it's uncommon.
Big 3%+ up days on the S&P 500 don't happen very often. In fact, aside from the recent volatility, the last time stocks posted one-day gains of this magnitude was during the climb out of the March 2009 bear market low. Of course, this is exactly the type of thing that screams out for a historical analysis.
For your benefit, I went back and looked at the S&P 500 going back to 1938, when situations were similar to now. The takeaway: History suggests stocks are headed higher over the next 6 to 12 months. Now, it's important to remember that historical relationships can always change. And this is just one data point among many. But it is definitely good news.
When the S&P 500 has posted a one-day gain of more than 3% when stocks were below both their 200-day and 50-day moving averages, the average return over the next six months was 6.5%. The average return over the next 12 months was 15%. For the math geeks: Both measures were statistically significant at the 99% confidence level.
Looking back, when the stock market was in bull market mode and the economy was expanding, the instances of 3%+ up days when stocks were below their 50-day and 200-day moving averages marked excellent buying opportunities. There were a few times when the 3%+ up day signal was all wrong, such as in March and September 2008, the 2000-01 period, 1973, 1946 and 1940. But overall, this is a signal worth listening to.
It can be made even stronger by adding in a data point to reflect the condition of the economy. Recently, I talked about the strength of the 12-month change in the Leading Economic Index -- which is based on things like hours worked and interest rates -- as a predictor of economic growth. Looking only at the years in which the 12-month LEI was positive (as it is now), one can reduce the number of false positives given by the 3%+ signal.
With the LEI filter, the 12-month forward return increased to 16.8%. And although the sample size was smaller (there have been 20 occurrences since 1962), the results were still statistically valid at the 99% confidence level. There were still a few bad calls in October 2000 and early 2002. But overall, the results were very positive.
In the chart above, I have illustrated these 3%+, sub-50-day and 200-day signals along with the S&P 500. I took the 10-base log of the price to reduce the visual height and fit it all in the chart. And I've only included the signals that occurred when the LEI 12-month growth rate was positive.
The picture speaks a thousand words. And it's telling us now is the time to be optimistic about the stock market -- as it was in 1962, 1987, 1998 and 2003.
Watch me trade during the day at Wall Street Survivor.
Disclosure: The author does not own or control a position in any company mentioned. He can be contacted at email@example.com. Feel free to comment below.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
Fed keeps important 'considerable time' language in reference to short-term interest rates, but dissents and dots leave doubts.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.
Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.
Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.