The sad state of Fannie and Freddie

Think the banking bailout was bad? Check out the funds going to these two companies.

By Kim Peterson Jun 21, 2010 2:08PM
Home financing © CorbisWe've spent a lot of time talking about the federal bailout of the banking industry, but guess what: The government's takeover of Fannie Mae (FNM) and Freddie Mac (FRE) will cost taxpayers even more money.

That's according to The New York Times, which had an excellent report Sunday on the sad state of Fannie and Freddie. The tab to take care of the companies is up to $146 billion, and the Congressional Budget Office predicts it could climb as high as $389 billion.

What happened here? Fannie and Freddie have been getting investors to fund mortgage loans for decades, promising to repay if borrowers defaulted, Binyamin Appelbaum writes. The companies used the money to buy loans already made by banks.

And it was a brisk business -- until a giant chunk of homeowners did in fact default. Fannie and Freddie had to make good on their promises to repay investors, who had become skittish about having anything to do with the two companies.

That's when the federal government took over, hoping that investors would continue to buy in. That would in turn provide more money for continued home loans. Post continues after video:
\
These days, Fannie and Freddie are busy seizing foreclosed homes, sprucing them up and reselling them at a huge loss, Appelbaum writes. The companies took over a foreclosed home every 90 seconds in the first three months of the year, he reports.

What to do with Fannie and Freddie now? Congressional Republicans want to be done with the companies, cutting all ties once the current economic crisis fades, Appelbaum writes. Democrats don't want to talk about it until after the elections this fall.

But there are larger issues that must be discussed at the same time -- namely, how involved should the government be in the housing market. Banks and other private lenders don't want to give loans to anyone without a 20% down payment. If the government didn't step in to help, a large percentage of the population would never be able to own a home.
The government extended itself too much to prop up the housing market over the past two years, keeping prices artificially inflated. Advocates argued that allowing the housing market to fall any further would obliterate an already reeling economy.

But there's something to be said for letting the chips fall where they may in the housing market. A correction in prices is badly needed.

One prominent government official -- Sheila Bair, chair of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation -- says a revamp of Fannie and Freddie should be the government's next financial priority after financial reform passes.

She's right. The government has slowly been removing its emergency support mechanisms in the housing market, and it must overhaul Fannie and Freddie soon.
4Comments
Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

DATA PROVIDERS

Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.

Japanese stock price data provided by Nomura Research Institute Ltd.; quotes delayed 20 minutes. Canadian fund data provided by CANNEX Financial Exchanges Ltd.

STOCK SCOUTER

StockScouter rates stocks from 1 to 10, with 10 being the best, using a system of advanced mathematics to determine a stock's expected risk and return. Ratings are displayed on a bell curve, meaning there will be fewer ratings of 1 and 10 and far more of 4 through 7.

127
127 rated 1
269
269 rated 2
462
462 rated 3
588
588 rated 4
658
658 rated 5
615
615 rated 6
645
645 rated 7
431
431 rated 8
263
263 rated 9
138
138 rated 10
12345678910

Top Picks

SYMBOLNAMERATING
COPConocoPhillips10
NWSNews Ord Shs Class B10
YHOOYahoo! Inc10
TJXTJX Companies Inc9
AMXAmerica Movil ADR Rep 20 Ord Shs Series L9
More

LATEST POSTS

Scary story: the 2013 market looks like 1987

All hail the bull market, which ended the week with a big rally. But it also is starting to look a little like 1987, which suffered an epic blow-out.

Fidelity Brokerage Services, Member NYSE, SIPC. (c) 2011 FMR LLC. All rights reserved

VIDEO ON MSN MONEY

ABOUT

Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.

Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.

Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.