Goldman's charity talk is just PR
The company might mandate charitable giving to cool the furor over bonuses, but the real problem is its excessively high compensation.
Does Wall Street have a heart? Goldman Sachs' putting billions of dollars in bonus money to good work would certainly seem so.
Not to be cynical, but I suspect anything Goldman does at this point is all public-relations oriented. If the company could go back to operating profitably in anonymity, it would in a heartbeat. Who needs the spotlight?
The problem is that the spotlight is not going away anytime soon. What I find interesting is that shareholders are staying relatively quiet on the subject.
The fear, of course, is that cutting bonuses or compensation would only hurt profits in the long run. But what if the opposite were true?
I think at this point in the game, cutting compensation could be a winning decision in the long term. I know doing so would be controversial and defies many basic economic tenets, but I think things really have got out of hand on Wall Street.
What many people forget is that Wall Street has experienced a maelstrom on compensation. On the debt side of the street, especially among those dealing in banking, underwriting and trading government debt, had the spotlight back in the 1980s.
For years, Wall Street made huge fees at the expense of state governments. Making fees transparent while requiring reporting of perks received by government officials changed the way Wall Street did business.
The arguments for keeping the status quo back then sound very similar to what we hear today. The biggest argument is the brain drain that would occur if compensation were lost.
In the bond world, there was no brain drain as a result of cutting fees and making the process more transparent. In other words, all that brain power was not really needed.
The same is true with respect to today's Wall Street. Requiring employees to give to charity will not fix the problem. The problem is compensation has become too high.
The first company to figure this out will likely be rewarded in more ways than one.
Related Articles:
| Tags: | InvestorPlace |
MORE ON MSN MONEY
DATA PROVIDERS
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.
Japanese stock price data provided by Nomura Research Institute Ltd.; quotes delayed 20 minutes. Canadian fund data provided by CANNEX Financial Exchanges Ltd.
LATEST POSTS
All hail the bull market, which ended the week with a big rally. But it also is starting to look a little like 1987, which suffered an epic blow-out.
FIDELITY VIEWPOINTS
- How to sell covered calls - Fidelity Investments
- Savvy year-end tax moves to consider now - Fidelity Investments
- Seven ways to prepare for tax changes
- Five reasons an annual review is crucial - Fidelity Investments
- Take a look at mid caps now - Fidelity Investments
- State of the sector: Health care - Fidelity Investments
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
ABOUT
Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.
Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.
Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.
