Can a bad Apple spoil the barrel?
Everyone wants AAPL, but how can you protect yourself?
All other companies just produce laptops, computers and PCs. Apple produces devices with wonderful-sounding names that you've just got to have before anyone else does. Other companies are just the present; Apple has the mystique of being the future.
Have the Apple worms crawled into my ears, and are they now controlling my mind, as with the other cult members? Is there any way I can plug my ears to the song of the Apple siren and write an honest and objective view of this stock?
Let's get the popular stuff out of the way. To say Apple has a following is an understatement. On Motley Fool, the CAPS members vote 22,413 to 2,018 that the stock will beat the market, and the All Stars are similarly entranced by a vote of 4,787 to 236. Even the Wall Street columnists Fool follows have written positive articles 46 to 0.
The Wall Street brokerages are not immune to the hype. There are 43 with published recommendations, and their analysts have 25 "strong buy" and 22 "buy" reports published.
Even the old staid and very objective Value Line thinks the stock is a timely acquisition for your portfolio.
Let's step back and look at raw numbers using Barchart. I note that there are 12 of the 13 Barchart technical indicators on a buy signal for an overall 96% buy rating.
Those of you who follow my blogs know I try to be objective and not follow the crowd. Just because Citigroup (C) is one of the most widely traded and reported stock has not swayed me into buying that dog. Here with Apple it looks like the real deal. Here's what its got:
- The stock has a very wide an positive following by the general investing public.
- Wall Street brokerage analysts have released buy recommendations based on solid fundamentals and expect high double digit increases in sales and earnings.
- Wall Street columnists are giving the stock strong and positive press coverage.
- Barchart confirms recent positive and consistent upward price momentum.
Except for some very narrow-sector mutual funds, it must be owned by an overwhelming majority of every pension plan and mutual fund in the known free world.
And that's the butterfly in my stomach. If the sales or earnings estimates are not met the mass exodus will be worse than the panic caused by fire crackers at a South American soccer match.
If I were an investor in this stock, I'd also buy some puts for insurance. This is a stock where sell stop just won't protect you.
Jim Van Meerten is an adviser to Marketocracy Capital Management who uses his model portfolios not only to manage their mutual funds but also their clients Separately Managed Accounts. You can read his blogs about those model portfolios and investing here and on Barchart Portfolio Blogs. Please leave a comment below or email JimVanMeerten@gmail.com.
Disclosure: Jim Van Meerten through Marketocracy Capital Management has an interest in the stocks mentioned in this blog.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
Remy Cointreau says it was 'adversely affected' by China's anti-extravagance policy.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.
Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.
Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.