Did US wrongly close auto dealers?

A report from TARP regulators says yes, but Treasury says millions of manufacturing jobs were saved.

By InvestorPlace Jul 19, 2010 11:22AM

auto dealer gm chryslerA report is out today from officials saying the government hurt American workers by forcing the closure of GM and Chrysler auto dealerships as part of the automakers' 2009 bailouts.

"The fact that Treasury was acting in part as an investor in GM and Chrysler does not insulate Treasury from its responsibility to the broader economy," said the special inspector general for TARP funds -- a kind of watchdog for the bailouts.


But Treasury and the White House were quick to counter, pointing out that the loss of dealership jobs was offset by the fact that thousands if not millions of manufacturing jobs were saved. The move was likened to layoffs at a company that hurt the individual workers who are fired but preserved the jobs of many more who remained on the payroll.


So what’s the real impact on the auto industry? Was the government's move a necessary evil or was uncle Sam looking out for corporate interests instead of the average worker?


First off, neither Chrysler nor GM are publicly traded companies. While there is speculation of a General Motors IPO as early as August, there is no way to easily track the “value” of the companies over the past several months without stock pricing.

But a look at auto sales is as good a proxy as any, and these numbers tell an interesting story for the industry as a whole. Overall June sales were down compared to May numbers but up significantly over the previous year. Specifically, in June Chrysler saw a stunning +35% year-over-year increase though it lost around -12% compared with May. The story was the same for GM -- an +11% year-over-year increase, but a drop of -13% over the previous month.


This is logical. June 2009 was a relatively weak month for automakers, with GM headed into bankruptcy protection and the industry in the midst of its worst annual sales in 30 years. So it’s natural to see year-over-year strength. More telling is the month-to-month drop which was fairly steep – over -10% in sales for Toyota (TM), GM, Chrysler, Ford (F) and Nissan (NSANY). That drop shows that we’re certainly not out of the woods yet when it comes to auto sales.

The upcoming second quarter earnings from automakers will also reflect this year-over-year strength but sideways movement in the shorter term. Toyota and Ford will report earnings on August 4 and July 23, respectively, and both are projected to post significant profits over a steep loss for Q2 in 2009. But both companies are also to expect to report smaller profits than in each of the last two quarters (that’s Q1 2010 and Q4 2009).


So in a nutshell, things are better for automakers but vehicle sales have not yet returned to pre-recession levels. More significantly, auto sales show no clear sign that they are permanently on the upswing.  That means that in the short term, bailed out auto companies GM and Chrysler must stay lean and competitive just like Toyota, Ford and others.


With an outlook like that, it’s hard to argue that the government cut too much from the balance sheets of Chrysler and GM. If these automakers were seeing record sales that may be a legitimate argument -- but as with all corners of the economy, until we know for sure that the recovery has taken hold it seems wise to use a healthy dose of caution.

It's worth noting that the TARP Czar was fair in saying the government was acting as an investor in GM and Chrysler when it made the dealership cuts. For better or worse, when these companies took the bailout from Uncle Sam, that is exactly what the government became. Unfortunately, accusing the government of acting like an investor doesn’t inherently prove malice.


Of course, whether or not the government should ever be in that position to begin with is a separate (and much more complicated) argument.

Related Articles:

Nov 9, 2010 3:02PM
My Family was a GM Chevrolet dealer for 81 years,  taking our franchise was and is BS.  I personally hope for their failure.  I hope you think twice before purchasing a gm vehicle or investing in them.  They want you to be loyal owners of their products,  but are not loyal to their dealers, suppliers or employees.  Stabbed us in the back, they didn't have to honor their own rules for dealership closures thanks to the government.  
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?


Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.


StockScouter rates stocks from 1 to 10, with 10 being the best, using a system of advanced mathematics to determine a stock's expected risk and return. Ratings are displayed on a bell curve, meaning there will be fewer ratings of 1 and 10 and far more of 4 through 7.

125 rated 1
267 rated 2
455 rated 3
612 rated 4
682 rated 5
695 rated 6
632 rated 7
472 rated 8
279 rated 9
147 rated 10

Top Picks

TAT&T Inc9



Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.

Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.

Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.