Stocks headed for a correction?

After months of ambling along, equities, crude oil and other risky assets are falling hard on poor economic data. It's set to continue.

By Anthony Mirhaydari May 4, 2012 1:24PM

In my post here Thursday, I warned that the little dollar-driven rebound rally of late April was ending and would be replaced with something much uglier.


In fact, the head-and-shoulders reversal pattern traced out by the NYSE Composite ($NYA) suggested stocks could very well be headed for mid-December levels -- a drop of more than 5% from current levels. Peak to trough, that would be a 10% drop from the March high.

 

 

On Friday, this new breakdown picked up steam as the April jobs report disappointed already lowered expectations. There were just 115,000 jobs created last month, compared with the 165,000 consensus estimate. The unemployment rate ticked down to 8.1% but only because of the 522,000 souls who left the workforce. Service-sector activity in Europe also slowed more than expected. 

 

Stocks have reached a critical decision point as the March-April support lows are tested. By all indications, they will be breached. Here's why, and what investors should do next.

 

First let's talk about the economy, which has wilted under the pressure of higher fuel prices, falling real wages, a moribund housing market and global pressures from weakness in Europe and Asia. It's no longer benefiting from the mildest winter since records started in 1895, which, via the government's seasonal adjustments to things like job gains, has made the data look better than they really are.

 

And that means that, for the third year in a row, the economy is slowing as we head into spring. Just look at the slowdown in job gains over the past few months. In January, private payrolls jumped 277,000. In February, 254,000. In March 166,000. And now, 130,000. Gluskin Sheff economist David Rosenberg notes that the April tally was the weakest since last August, when stocks were poised to hit 2011 lows, and that, given where we are in the business cycle, we should be seeing totals closer to 230,000.

 

In his words, "there is really no way to describe this result any other way than disappointment."


The drop, he believes, is happening as businesses respond to three negative factors: a slowdown in profit growth (higher costs and weak sales), a response to slowing economic activity (stripping out weather effects, real GDP dropped 0.2% in Q1) and falling labor productivity.

 

That last point is key: Over the past decade, whenever productivity drops in a given quarter, an increasingly profit-conscious corporate sector cuts hiring in the quarter that follows, each and every time. Thus, we should expect the pace of job growth to keep falling.

 

Should job growth slow, real wages will continue to fall. And as wages fall, so will spending. And with lower spending and the tax hikes and spending cuts out of Washington that loom in early 2013, the economy could very well follow much of Europe down into a new outright recession.

 

The caveat in all this is that the Federal Reserve will likely respond, possibly as soon as its next policy meeting at the end of June, to this emerging weakness with a third round of quantitative easing.  That would send stocks surging -- as it did in late 2010 and early 2011 -- and give the economy a temporary sugar rush before the negative side effects of higher inflation and higher fuel prices short-circuit everything again -- as it did in mid-2011 and early 2012.

 

 

As for the technical situation in the market, there are big breakdowns happening all over the place. Crude oil is plunging. Small caps are plunging. Cyclical, economically sensitive sectors like financials, semiconductors and energy, as well as industries like semiconductors, are all plunging. Copper and other industrial metals are moving lower.

 

I'll admit the sudden breakdown caught me by surprise. I was expecting the market to start discounting the Fed's likely QE3 announcement. And Tuesday's ISM manufacturing report was misleadingly strong.

 

 

But first, apparently, we need to suffer a little before the central bankers ride to the rescue. The drop in crude oil will ease inflationary pressures, giving the Fed room to maneuver. And a confirmation of a slowdown in growth will ease any political flak and reduce the appearance that Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke is trying to help President Barack Obama's re-election chances.

 

 

 

I'm not the only one scrambling. Put option activity is surging after dropping to a lull over the past two weeks. Breadth is deteriorating as an increasing share of the market moves lower in unison, pushing the McClellan Oscillator back into negative territory have a brief excursion above zero (a sign of weakness by the bulls). And former highflyers like Apple (AAPL), a very popular holding among both retail investors and hedge fund types, are being cut down viciously.

 

It's do-or-die time for the market now as the NYSE Composite falls to test its neckline support of head-and-shoulders pattern. It doesn't look good. A breach looks likely.

 

The good news is that the correction should last only a month or so at the most before a QE3-fueled rebound pushes stocks up into July and August.


Trading update

 

I expanded the Edge Letter Sample Portfolio's short positioning today with a few new additions in the financial and energy spaces. Both the Direxion 3x Financial Bear (FAZ) and Direxion 3x Energy Bear (ERY) leveraged inverse ETFs were added. For more conservative investors, less risky alternatives include the ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF) and the ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas (DUG).

 

I also added two individual short positions: Valley National Bancorp (VLY) and Invesco (IVZ).

 

I found these positions with the help of technical screens developed with Fidelity's Wealth Lab Pro back-testing tools, which you can find here. (Fidelity sponsors the Investor Pro section on MSN Money.) 


Disclosure: Anthony has recommended DUG to his newsletter subscribers.

 


Check out Anthony's investment advisory service The Edge. A two-week free trial has been extended to MSN Money readers. Click here to sign up. Contact Anthony at anthony@edgeletter.c​om and follow him on Twitter at @EdgeLetter. You can view his current stock picks here. Feel free to comment below.

 

 

39Comments
May 4, 2012 9:22PM
avatar

Koo,

 

Cut military, why did Obama just sign with Afganastan for another twelve years?

May 4, 2012 9:15PM
avatar

So called "quantatative easing" boosts stock prices, but does nothing for the economy.   All it does is artificially keep the market at higher levels through deficit spending.    Given the absolutely dismal real world results of QE1 and 2, I wonder what makes ol Ben think a third round is going to have any real positive results?

 

Oh sure, the first two have contributed to rising stock prices, but that has little to do with the real world job numbers.   Ben needs to quit playing market psychologist with this thinking that if people "feel good about the stock market", that it will somehow  translate into actual economic improvement. 

 

If the results of the first two rounds didn't convince him that he's totally wrong, then a third round surely won't either.  But then again, when has government ever listened to common sense?  Not to mention we have an election coming up, and of course, Uncle Ben wants to keep his job as much as anyone else in this administration, so what harm could come from proping up the stock market until after the election?  You can be sure that's a prime consideration in the QE soap opera.

 

 

May 4, 2012 9:15PM
avatar
yeah - this guy seems to be very reactive not proactive
May 4, 2012 9:07PM
avatar
Mirhaydari admits to shorting two bank stocks. What else is new? A few days ago he was advising everyone to pile back in. Now, go away in May. Jobs growth is weak because the Republican-controlled Congress is refusing to help Obama with the economy in this election year. Throw their old privileged asses out of office and you will see a miraculous change take place in December 2012. Mirhaydari usually pops up on a bad day but he is right...QE3 is coming and that will be the straw that broke the Republican's backsides. We need to reduce the military quickly and put them all on the GI Bill going to school. We can't afford to keep paying for the Bush build-up to armageddon when Bin Laden is dead. Neither side has the resolve to secure our borders and win the drug war because it affects Latino votes. Maybe we should leave it all up to the states and cut the federal government to the bone until we can afford another build-up to war. The politicans are shorting this stock market and the biased news media.
May 4, 2012 8:42PM
avatar
Funny Anthony, I thought it was "Time to Buy" a week or so ago as you article was titled. I do very well doing the opposite of what you recommend so keep the articles coming!
May 4, 2012 8:28PM
avatar
How about instead of giving the banks another few billion to horde and sit on, you give every single working taxpayer a check for 10k or so.  It's called trickle up economics.  It works because lower income folks spend money.   
May 4, 2012 5:04PM
avatar
Go ahead Ben print some more and put it in the bank vaults with QE1 and QE2. Lot of good that will do. 1 & 2 didn't work. Keep doing the same thing over and over. Real bright.
May 4, 2012 4:50PM
avatar
S & P upper 1200's here we come. Bernanke has been sitting on the edge of his nice leather Fed chair waiting to place the call to the basement to turn on the printing presses again. Is it just me, or do all these central banks pumping in over 7 Trillion give you a not so fuzzy feeling what may come about when the sugar high goes away? Around the end of the year after QE3 (or maybe QE4 by then) wears off. 
May 4, 2012 3:39PM
avatar
stock market is nothing but crooked ,fixed ****!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
May 4, 2012 3:35PM
avatar
We dont need qe3 we need to require all these corporations sitting on mountains of cash to pay cash on the debt to eliminate the deficit, there are millions of individuals sitting on 500 thousand dollars, and not spending they could pay twenty thousand dollars cash on the deficit, the banks could pay a million and not even notice, and receive tax breaks for it over ten years, the interest saved would be around 4 trillion over ten years If they borrow more money the nation should stand up and say enough is enough when there is millions sitting on mountains of cash  and not spending,  
May 4, 2012 3:23PM
avatar

This economic problem we are facing in the country is everyone's problem it does not matter how much anyone has!

Why not pass a bill that requires everyone to pay cash money on the deficit?

work out a plan to eliminate the deficit, on a sliding scale some can pay 100.00 dollars others can pay a thousand, up to a million dollars, then have all corporations, all businesses, banks organizations etc. pay  a certain amount of cash, leave the tax base low for another couple of years as the economy grows, give all corporations, banks etc. a tax break for the cash money they pay over ten years, if possible raise enough to bring the debt down by even six trillion dollars this year, dont cut government spending for another year or two but look for ways to save, without throwing the recovery off!

why kick the can down the road any longer? as they start to fix the system when the debt comes down they can redo the tax system, by lowering the tax, and widening the base when everyone is working, and the real estate market returns , this will give them time to work out all the other problems with manufacturing, SS, medicare affordable health care, and they would not need to gut defense at this time, and reduce defense when we are living in better times! 

May 4, 2012 3:12PM
avatar
Start the presses so he can be right for once.
May 4, 2012 3:09PM
avatar
Hasn't the Fed stated they've used all their resources that it's up to congress and other economic policies to bring about economic growth?  QE1 & 2 didn't work, it just add inflation and possibly ruined any chance of a decent recovery.  The only thing I can think the government can do is bring about an energy policy that reduces the cost of all energy.  We need some deflation in areas, healthy deflation caused by supply increase.

As for trade, economics the way it is set up right now with outsourced jobs to cheap labor in other nations this is what you get. These cheap laborers can't afford to buy the product and now neither can the consumer that once occupied that job of the cheap laborers. 

The only reason there was a recovery from the .com bubble was because of the next bubble.  Policies like NAFTA, KAFTA, and all are drowning out the ability for consumers to make a wage that drives the economy.  And neither nations, the places where jobs were taken to the nations where the jobs were put won in the long run.  Something that anyone with a high school diploma or GED or even a 10th grader could figure out. 

True net gain from trade must either be a resource the other nation doesn't have and/or enough of, or can truly produce something more efficiently.  Using labor costs as the corner stone of the efficiency is a distortion that will reveal itself as such in the long run.
 
And the long run has come: We've had a little over 30 years of the mad rush for cheap labor the long run is now showing us the results.

May 4, 2012 3:08PM
avatar
Paid to 'dow' what he does.  The book comes to mind "The Dowager Prince" ...Of course we know these 'pundits' are phony.  They should see the infomercial on 'The pillow' for 19.95!  One payment is free and we will 'guarantee' 2 pillows.  Just have fun with them! 
May 4, 2012 2:56PM
avatar
Anthony, does your head hurt from getting whipsawed so badly these last few weeks?  And yet, somehow, you're never wrong!!  As the French say, "incroyable!!"
May 4, 2012 2:51PM
avatar
Tony tony tony..... Just a few days back you were telling us it was time to buy.  What happened?  You didn't foresee your daily vision of the end of the world this time?
May 4, 2012 2:43PM
avatar
It is the nature of the beast.  You can not control it.  You can only follow its lead.  The market is headed down and get more ugly.  The Fed will pump more money into the system and kick the can down the road.  The thing is, the economy is running out of road fast.  Can you say "fiscal cliff".  Smile
May 4, 2012 2:23PM
avatar
Smile Stocks are 100% profits for some. Go figure. And they also have big salaries bonuses perks periodic stock options and nice offices. They are eternally and infinitely and essentially  the market.
May 4, 2012 1:57PM
avatar

Let me guess on this. I think we won't take much of a drop in the market. And a QE 3 will fall flat on it's face with maybe a little pop.

 

Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

DATA PROVIDERS

Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.

Japanese stock price data provided by Nomura Research Institute Ltd.; quotes delayed 20 minutes. Canadian fund data provided by CANNEX Financial Exchanges Ltd.

STOCK SCOUTER

StockScouter rates stocks from 1 to 10, with 10 being the best, using a system of advanced mathematics to determine a stock's expected risk and return. Ratings are displayed on a bell curve, meaning there will be fewer ratings of 1 and 10 and far more of 4 through 7.

127
127 rated 1
269
269 rated 2
462
462 rated 3
588
588 rated 4
657
657 rated 5
616
616 rated 6
645
645 rated 7
430
430 rated 8
261
261 rated 9
138
138 rated 10
12345678910

Top Picks

SYMBOLNAMERATING
COPConocoPhillips10
NWSNews Ord Shs Class B10
YHOOYahoo! Inc10
TJXTJX Companies Inc9
AMXAmerica Movil ADR Rep 20 Ord Shs Series L9
More

LATEST POSTS

Scary story: the 2013 market looks like 1987

All hail the bull market, which ended the week with a big rally. But it also is starting to look a little like 1987, which suffered an epic blow-out.

Fidelity Brokerage Services, Member NYSE, SIPC. (c) 2011 FMR LLC. All rights reserved

VIDEO ON MSN MONEY

ABOUT

Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.

Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.

Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.