Apple at $1,000? Don't bet on it

Eye-popping price targets for the tech stock should be viewed skeptically.

By Jonathan Berr Jun 12, 2012 12:24PM
Apple logo copyright BECK DIEFENBACH/ReutersWill Apple (AAPL) hit $1,000 within two years? Who knows?

Apple, whose products I like and use, is a company that Wall Street analysts think is so awesome they have simply run out of superlatives for it. In the wake of Monday's announcement of a new mobile mapping service and improvements to SIRI, Topeka Capital analyst Brian White, the biggest Apple bull, took to the airwaves of CNBC yet again, saying he "couldn't be more bullish on Apple right now."  That's saying something.

Earlier this year, White became the first analyst to predict that shares of the Cupertino, Calif., company would top $1,000 -- $1,001 to be precise.  A month later, White raised his prediction to $1,100. Even Piper Jaffray's Gene Munster, Wall Street's other well-known Apple bull, isn't that bold. He expects Apple to reach $1,000 in 2014.

Shares of Apple recently traded around $575, up more than 40% so far this year.  Last year, White put a $666 price target on the stock at a time when it was trading around $390. The shares hit an all-time high of $644 on April 10, which is well under the $740 median 52-week price target.

Maybe history will vindicate White and Munster in the coming years for being the first to truly grasp the company's potential earnings power. White's forecasts, though, should be taken with a huge grain of salt given the difficulty that analysts have guessing how Apple will perform each quarter. Predicting where Apple will be in 2013 and 2014 is kind of like trying to hit a target with a bow and arrow while blindfolded.

Pundits have made similarly bold predictions about other high-flying stocks. In 2006, analyst Mark Stahlman said it was theoretically possible that Google (GOOG) might reach  $2,000 a share. Mad Money's Jim Cramer argued a year later that the search engine giant might reach $1,000. Shares of the search engine giant briefly topped $700 in 2007. They last traded at $568.27, down 12% for the year.

Earlier this year, Piper Jaffray analyst Michael J. Olson argued that (PCLN) could hit $1,000 in the next 24 months. He placed a $763 price target on the shares. Last month, the online travel site forecast weaker-than-expected bookings growth, sending shares tumbling. They have declined more than 10% over the past week.

Apple shares are priced for perfection. They are also cheap, trading a price-to-earnings multiple of 14, near its five-year low, according to Reuters.  If you believe that Apple's best days are ahead, the time to act is now.

Jonathan Berr does not own shares of the listed companies.  Follow him on Twitter@jdberr.

Jun 12, 2012 6:05PM
Another idiotic Apple article with not the slightest shred of basic logic to support its click-bait headline. For proof, just look at the final paragraph. Apple's shares are "priced for perfection," but they are also "cheap"? Does this writer know the first thing about what either of those two things actually means?

I clicked because I have a few shares and it seems prudent to read what people with the opposing view are thinking. In this case, the writer doesn't seem to be thinking at all.

Jun 12, 2012 1:19PM
It all depends on te next 2-3 quarters of earnings from Apple, Google, Microsoft. Nokia nad Samsung. It the street sees two bites out of their Apple they'll run like a herd of chickens.
I need all my stocks to go to $1000., I would be very happy. Dumped Apple the  after i made a few hundred bucks. But , you never know. The same with Google. I read a article and panicked. Sold Google the day after I bought it. Two huge mistakes. Now I would rather buy less expensive stocks and make some money and sell them. Times have changed. A wealthy person might say these stocks are cheap. Yea, place an order for 400 shares of Google. Priced right. $25,000. Not to the average Joe.I could buy a car for that. No whitewalls.
Jun 12, 2012 6:31PM
is Apple some sort of fruit company?
Jun 12, 2012 6:54PM
who cares. If you bought it when it was cheap and are just waiting for the peak, good for you, but for anyone to go out and spend almost 100K for a 100 shares of a company that MAY make you 1 or 2 percent if you're lucky you have to be nuts. Put your money in the bank, the 1 % is for sure
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?


Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.


StockScouter rates stocks from 1 to 10, with 10 being the best, using a system of advanced mathematics to determine a stock's expected risk and return. Ratings are displayed on a bell curve, meaning there will be fewer ratings of 1 and 10 and far more of 4 through 7.

124 rated 1
266 rated 2
452 rated 3
702 rated 4
671 rated 5
604 rated 6
640 rated 7
495 rated 8
267 rated 9
158 rated 10

Top Picks




Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.

Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.

Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.