Vivus, Arena burn more cash than fat

The two companies face problems with their weight-loss drugs.

By TheStreet Staff Feb 26, 2013 1:07PM

thestreet logoOverweight copyright Image Source, Getty ImagesBy Adam Feuerstein

 

Vivus (VVUS) can't convince enough fat Americans to try its weight-loss pill Qsymia, despite spending a ton of cash on marketing and free drug giveaways. 


At its current burn rate, Vivus will need to raise more money no later than the second half of the year.

 

The dismal $2 million in Qsymia sales reported by Vivus in the fourth quarter is a harbinger of doom for Arena Pharmaceuticals (ARNA), which along with partner Eisai is expected to launch its weight-loss pill Belviq next month. Belviq barely manages to help patients lose any meaningful weight, but will cost significantly more than Qsymia.

 

Let's first tackle Vivus because the company turned in an ugly quarter Monday night. 


The $2 million in Qsymia sales was $1 million short of downgraded analyst consensus for the fourth quarter. How downgraded? Last fall, analysts on average were looking for more than $24 million in Qsymia sales during the December quarter.

 

Vivus spent more than $50 million in SG&A to generate those $2 million in Qsymia sales in the fourth quarter. Add in R&D costs and Vivus' total operating expenses topped $58 million. Cash and marketable securities fell by $61 million sequentially. Vivus ended last year with $213 million in the piggy bank and refused to offer any spending guidance for 2013 except to acknowledge that marketing expenses for Qsymia will remain high.

 

Even if Qsymia sales pick up, Vivus' current and expected rate of spending means there's less than a year's cash remaining.

 

For the four-week period ending on Feb. 15, Vivus shipped 17,383 Qsymia prescriptions, a 34% increase over the previous four-week period ended on Jan. 18. That sounds like encouraging script growth, except it's down from 68% growth in the four-week period between November and December last year. Vivus deserves a pass for the December holiday month -- no one wants to lose weight during

Christmas -- and sure enough, the number of Qsymia scripts shipped was flat.

 

Bottom line: The rate of Qsymia script growth is falling despite the company offering freebies and other marketing inducements. Vivus continues to blame Qsymia's poor performance on the hassle of mail-order pharmacy requirements and believes sales will take off once patients can buy the drug at their neighborhood pharmacy. [FDA's decision on liberalizing the drug's distribution restriction is expected in April.] There's certainly some truth in this spin but Qsymia has a tremendously long way to go before sales reach a meaningful level. The idea that Qsymia might one day achieve blockbuster status or help Vivus generate a profit seems more fantasy than an achievable goal.

 

One more metric from Monday night's conference call I found interesting and disappointing simultaneously: Vivus said 27,000 unique patients have been prescribed Qsymia since the drug launched five months ago. A Qsymia script costs approximately $135 per month for the recommended middle dose, so under the most optimal circumstances (all 27,000 patients taking five months of Qsymia), best-case sales to date would have been roughly $18 million.

 

The $2 million in actual Qsymia sales reported suggests a lot of patients are trying Qsymia for a month or two, then giving up. How many patients are discontinuing Qsymia and when? Vivus was asked this question on Monday's call but declined to answer directly. The company did say 44% of Qsymia scripts shipped in the most recent four-week period went to patients who had previously purchased the drug. The company also said the rate of abandonment (patients who have a Qsymia script written but don't actually fill it) was 22%. That's lower than the 30% abandonment rate reported last fall but still fairly high.

 

Patients abandon Qsymia scripts because the out-of-pocket cost of the drug is too much to bear. People don't want to pay $135 per month, or more than $1,900 over the course of a year, to lose 10% of their body weight. Insurance coverage for Qsymia is still sketchy and even for those people lucky enough to get reimbursement, the co-pay is $60 per month.

 

Enter Arena and Eisai, which on Monday set the wholesale acquisition cost for Belviq at $199.50 per month -- a 48% premium over Qsymia mid dose. That means patients taking Belviq will be paying a lot more for less weight loss. Patients who take Belviq lose, on average, a paltry 3% of their body weight after one year. More than half of Belviq patients fail to lose 5% of their body weight after three months.

 

With mediocre weight-loss numbers like those, Arena and Eisai are likely to soon feel the sting of abandonment rates well above those reported for Qsymia -- that is if patients even agree to have a Belviq script written for them in the first place.

 

If investors believe Vivus' $1.2 billion market value is too high to justify paltry Qsymia sales, Arena and its $1.8 billion market value is heading for a significant downward adjustment once Belviq sales come up lame.

 

More from TheStreet.com

1Comment
Mar 1, 2013 8:48PM
avatar

If they continue to add 4000 customers a month they will have sales of 80 million year one by word of mouth advertising. They will exceed $100,000,000 in sales with ease of the REMS expected in April

Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

DATA PROVIDERS

Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.

STOCK SCOUTER

StockScouter rates stocks from 1 to 10, with 10 being the best, using a system of advanced mathematics to determine a stock's expected risk and return. Ratings are displayed on a bell curve, meaning there will be fewer ratings of 1 and 10 and far more of 4 through 7.

126
126 rated 1
286
286 rated 2
474
474 rated 3
680
680 rated 4
626
626 rated 5
609
609 rated 6
620
620 rated 7
462
462 rated 8
304
304 rated 9
132
132 rated 10
12345678910

Top Picks

SYMBOLNAMERATING
AAPLAPPLE Inc10
BIDUBAIDU Inc10
BXTHE BLACKSTONE GROUP L.P10
CELGCELGENE CORP10
FOXATWENTY-FIRST CENTURY FOX Inc CLASS A10
More

VIDEO ON MSN MONEY

ABOUT

Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.

Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.

Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.