Even in this market, don't forget to be disciplined
It's a good time to remember Buffett's golden rule.
By David Sterman
Few would mistake the current market action with what we saw back in 2000, but it's increasingly clear that investors have become conditioned to ever-rising stock prices.
The S&P 500 ($INX) has posted a very impressive rebound over the past 17 quarters. In fact, over the past 20 months, the S&P 500 has risen 46%, which is what investors should reasonably expect from the market over six or seven years.
There's no shame in staying involved in a bull market, as long as you show a great deal of discipline. An ever-rising market requires you to start trimming the more aggressive and risky portfolio holdings, maintaining a focus on stocks and funds more likely to hold their own when the inevitable market correction comes.
"The line separating investment and speculation, which is never bright and clear, becomes blurred still further when most market participants have recently enjoyed triumphs. Nothing sedates rationality like large doses of effortless money."
Warren Buffett made those comments back in 2000. Since then, he has repeated a simple notion: If you want to score solid gains, avoid the crowd when it comes to the most popular investment trends of the moment -- focus instead on unloved stocks and sectors.
Few investors are heeding Buffett's words. A review of this year's most popular exchange-traded funds (ETFs) shows that investors are pouring their money into what has already been working in recent years and pulling money out of underperforming ETFs.
For example, as the market has risen, volatility has virtually disappeared. The VIX, a key measure of expected market choppiness, has fallen from above 80 in late 2008 to above 45 in the summer of 2011 to a recent 13.
ETFs that profit from low volatility have attracted more than $5 billion this year in new inflows, with one-third of that coming in April, according to BlackRock. In effect, investors are now betting on volatility to fall further, even as this investment angle appears to have largely played out.
Can volatility go lower? Not very much. In 2007, the VIX's 20-year low was registered at 10.5. The potential rebound for the VIX, on the other hand, is open-ended.
The fund has since risen a stunning 65%.
Trouble is, investors are still pouring money into this ETF. According to S&P Capital IQ, this fund has been the top asset gatherer this year with $5.3 billion in inflows. The iShares MSCI Japan (EWJ) is close behind with $4.2 billion. Investors are chasing success, which is precisely what they did in U.S. markets in late 1999 and 2000.
Of course, many other foreign markets aren't faring nearly as well. The United States, Europe and Japan have delivered great returns this year, but many emerging markets have risen only modestly. For instance, the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index (EEM) has fallen 2% this year.
How have investors responded to that underperformance?
They've pulled $5.4 billion out of that fund in 2013, according to BlackRock. Yet the relative underperformance of emerging market stocks and funds has led to a clear valuation gap. The trailing 12-month price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio on all of the emerging markets held in the iShares ETF now stands at just 11, well below the P/E of 15 for the S&P 500.
My point: If investors are bullish on the global economy, they should be buying the currently unpopular emerging-market funds.
In a similar vein, investors have been beating a hasty retreat from commodities-focused ETFs: In April, more than $8 billion was pulled from these funds, according to S&P Capital IQ.
Roughly a month ago, I took note of the sharp sell-off in commodities and at the time, noted that "lower prices counterintuitively set the stage for the next bull market in commodities," as supply is reduced and pricing starts to strengthen anew (see StreetAuthority). It's a bit premature to spot a commodity rally just yet, but contrarian investors would do well to start sharpening their pencils in this investment niche.
The fixed-income conundrum
Investors' need for income-producing stocks and funds is understandable. With bond yields from blue-chip issuers such as IBM (IBM) and Coca-Cola (KO) offering yields below 3%, investors have instead been focusing squarely on the debt issued by less creditworthy corporations.
These kinds of bonds are called "junk" for a reason. They carry a higher risk of default, though we've seen few major bankruptcies recently. Still, the ardor for these higher-yielding riskier bonds has led to a furious rally, pushing the historical yields from the 6% to 8% range to below 5%.
That's the result of billions pouring into high-yielding bond funds such as the PIMCO 0-5 High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS) and the iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). At some point in this economic cycle, these high-yield bonds will experience rising defaults, which could well lead to a furious exit from this riskier corner of the fixed-income market.
Risks to consider: Some of these ETF niches are in a mania phase, which can last for an extended period, so it's unwise to short them until clear signs of a market shift have emerged.
Action to take: The main lesson isn't that you should avoid this market. Instead, you should avoid its most popular niches and redirect assets into unloved niches, such as emerging markets and commodities. I remain a big fan of automakers and their suppliers, along with insurers, as they represent deep value in this rising market.
David Sterman does not personally hold positions in any securities mentioned in this article.
More from StreetAuthority
The S&P might be up 46% over the last 20 months, but it's only up 16% over the last 13+ years.
How there is again record Buying on Margin. How about the Bogus explosion in electronic frequency trading. How about Global Feds buying stocks. WE all see how and or why the Markets continue to rise. We vary on how long it can or should last. People are buying on false perceptions, eventually they will be Selling on the Cold Hard Reality.
The golden rule is this
The one with the Gold makes the rules.
That said we are all doomed they say stocks are ok to buy when they have P/E ratios of like 34
Back in the 1960's and 1980's the rule was if a company hit a P/E ratio of 5 buy it and sell it when it hit a P/E ratio more than 10.
Pretty the market is just plain over valued by a long shot.
So many bubbles everywhere. It's like I got up each morning for the last 180 days and drank an entire bottle of champagne for breakfast before going to work . Thanks Ben Bernanke for keeping me soooooo wasted.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
The push is on for undervalued, cash-rich technology companies to return more money to investors. And there's still room for dividend growth.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.
Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.
Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.