Cisco: The fault lies in the stars, not the man
CEO John Chambers isn't to blame for Cisco's weakness, and neither is the company.
I come to praise John Chambers, not to bury him. It's become totally fashionable to criticize the CEO of Cisco (CSCO), and I can see it. The business has been decelerating each quarter while Chambers and company have continued to buy back stock, somewhat mindlessly, buying 27 million shares at $20.28 this quarter alone. Oops! Now it is $17!
But there is no denying that Chambers has put together a world-class team with world-class products offering an end-to-end solution.
But what's going wrong with the outlook at Cisco is a serious matter, and it is one that is not Cisco's fault. In fact, Cisco has made tremendous strides to become a less bloated, more aggressive institution, offering a diverse product line that sells into much more than just the telecom service providers and the enterprise. Cisco is the dominant Internet backbone, dominating the cloud, financial companies' tech needs and the needs of governments worldwide.
And that's where the problem lies: Cisco's everywhere, and with the exception of a couple of industries, such as the cloud and the data center players, these customers are very worried or are cutting back and cutting back severely.
Cisco's salespeople are amazing. They are the first to know of slowdowns, and they are telling John of a real slowdown. He's then gotten deep into the organization and has confirmed that slowdown.
Some of that is cyclical and comes back. The enterprise can't afford not to spend to stay up with its Internet, telco and data needs. It can defer spending; it can't shut it down.
But the governments of the world? One of the amazing things that Cisco has done is to ingratiate itself to governments worldwide, and that has become a very difficult market. No, Cisco isn't offering solar solutions, ones that require subsidies, but it is providing services to ever-larger, ever-growing government needs when they aren't getting larger and aren't growing.
That's troubling. But it surely is not Cisco's fault.
I have little doubt that Cisco will bounce back. It's difficult to say when, though, because the slowdown is new and the chaos around the world, particularly in Europe, is too much for any worldwide tech company to continue to be bullish.
And it is not only Europe; our federal government has ground to a halt. And that's going to hurt, too.
Nevertheless, there is no doubt that Cisco is using this moment to vanquish the competition, whether it be Juniper (JNPR) or Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) or Alcatel (ALU) or whatever Asian company might be trying to get into the game at any given time.
It's just that you can't blame Cisco for the weakness. It's rare that I ever say this, but this time, the fault isn't with Chambers, it is with the stars.
Jim Cramer is a co-founder of TheStreet and contributes daily market commentary to the financial news network's sites. At the time of publication, Action Alerts PLUS, which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust, had no positions in the stocks mentioned.
maybe the cramer fans haven't seen my challenge yet so i will repeat it............
you post a cramer pick on this site and i will post my pick ..............we can then monitor the results
and see how good your hack scam artist can do against me............don't be afaid to back your
know nothing unfunny comic
more evidence: cramer owns jpm in his trust because he says it is best of breed..........
his rigor and studying the fundamentals are again proved meaningless...............
his apology on cnbc this am was pitiful
his thesis of studying the fundamentals and beating the market by buying the best of breed individual stocks is again and again proved WRONG......................nobody can possibly know
about an individual stock..............anyone who thinks they can is fooling themself
properly hedged index funds is the ONLY way to beat the market over time
no wonder no cramer follower will accept my challenge to come on this site with a cramer pick
John Chambers should be blamed fro the mess Cisco is presently in. Just check his past performance and you will see what he has done to previous companies he has tried to lead. Well he did lead just in the wrong direction.
Take for example Wang Labs hired at its peak, was slow to acknowledge the PC market and left the company in a total mess to be sold off. Probably will do the same at Cisco removed my investment long ago when he was placed there as CEO, knew is was a real mistake from pass performance. Hope the Cisco Board wakes up and makes a change soon, only then will the turn around begin.
MORE ON MSN MONEY
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
The Fed may start tapering in just a few months. Here are a few of the likely winners and losers.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.
Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.
Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.