The case for selling Apple
After the tech giant's astonishing fourth-quarter results, how could its stock possibly be a 'sell'?
In a nearly unabated fashion, shares of Apple (AAPL) have continued to charge higher to new all-time levels following its blow-out fourth-quarter results.
Without question, it is the most-adored stock by investors and the darling of Wall Street. So, a roll of the eyes is the typical reaction when the rare pundit or analyst does come out with a negative opinion on AAPL. However, as we discuss here, there is a legitimate bearish argument, other than just "the stock has run too far, too fast."
Apple's fourth-quarter results were indeed astonishing. All of its primary products -- iPhones, iPads, and Macs -- easily outperformed expectations. In fact, during the fourth quarter, it became the world's largest smartphone maker, with roughly a 24% share. Looking ahead, the tech giant also has key launches in the pipeline, including the iPad 3 and the next version of the iPhone. There is little doubt that the company will continue to sell its devices at a mind-numbing pace, and that consumers will continue to line-up at its stores when the latest versions launch.
So, with that said, many are probably wondering how AAPL could possibly be a "sell." There are three primary issues that need to be considered. The first of which is less important, and is more of a short-term concern. The other two, however, could have longer-term ramifications for the company and the stock.
The first issue has to do with the euphoria that still envelops the company following its much-celebrated fourth-quarter results. It would be foolish to discount its phenomenal quarter, but there is a very important point to be made. A good portion of its sales come from vendors such as Verizon (VZ) and Sprint (S). In an effort to meet anticipated consumer-demand, Sprint in particular loaded up on iPhones to the point that it overstocked by a wide margin. In fact, the carrier spent about $20 billion on the devices and now holds a glut of inventory. Clearly, it will take several quarters just to work through this inventory, so investors shouldn’t expect a repeat purchase of that magnitude anytime soon.
The more pressing concerns, however, have broader implications for the company and its future. For instance, it is rather amazing that AAPL shares barely blinked following the passing of Steve Jobs -- the company's true visionary. Yes, Jobs left behind a road map for the company to follow, along with perhaps the "next big thing" (Apple TV), but the company cannot replace the image, and marketing genius that he emanated. He said it best himself: "I create products that people don’t even know they want." Is there anybody at Apple now who possesses that ability?
The truth is, Apple is a company that is completely consumer-driven, and consumers have flocked to it largely because of its brand identity. Jobs was the ultimate purveyor of this "cool" image. The problem now is that, with Jobs gone, the company loses that innovative mind and that absolutely crucial marketing talent, and the competitive environment is becoming more and more difficult. Google's (GOOG) Android operating system is capable of providing essentially the same functionality of an iPhone, and these devices are not as expensive.
Finally, there is the law of large numbers. It seems highly improbable that Apple can continue this rate of growth, especially given the increasing competition and the fact that emerging markets are slowing down. In a recent article, Gartner Research predicted that global smartphone sales volume will slow to 39% from the 58% we saw last year. Combine this with the probability that Apple won't be able to squeeze out much more in terms of margins, due to economies of scale being mostly played out, and the case can be made that AAPL is starting to look like a "sell" -- maybe even, dare I say, shortable.
Here, just off the top of my head (simply because I don't have the time right now to really get into it) are my 3 reasons why this article is way off;
1. iPad
2. China
3. Enterprise
This company is barely scratching the surface in all the above (and more).
And don't take #3 with the grain of salt that most bashers do.
Also, I can't believe 2 out of your three justifications for selling:
1. Law of Large Numbers - Apple bashers' favorite but lame reason to bail.
2. Steve Jobs' death - Tim Cook may be better at this than the late genius.
Just 2 cents worth from a fanboy, take it for what it's worth.
In an effort to meet anticipated consumer-demand, Sprint in particular loaded up on iPhones to the point that it overstocked by a wide margin. In fact, the carrier spent about $20 billion on the devices and now holds a glut of inventory.
I work for a company that sells Sprint and they are not over stocked. When the product launched, Sprint gave us 16 iphones, and we have over 20 stores. To date they are still running out of inventory weekly. Their "incredible sales" could've been better if they had more product. The iphone 5 will crush everything prior.
"Sprint Chief Executive Dan Hesse told Sprint's board in August that the carrier would have to agree to purchase the iphones over the next four years - a commitment of $20 billion at current rates... (or 30.5 million phones)".
Inventory glut? ... "several quarters to work through"... really?
AAPL has just two leading products in a consumer electronics industry which has proven time and time again to be one of the most fickle. It also has a market cap the size of ExxonMobil. Hmm. That’s got the little voice inside my head asking, “If I buy now at this price, who’s going to buy it from me?” I wish I had listened to that little voice when it was asking me the same question about the house I bought back in 2006. Maybe I would feel differently if I had decided to pay $750 for an Ipad last month instead of $199 for a Kindle Fire.
MORE ON MSN MONEY
DATA PROVIDERS
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.
Japanese stock price data provided by Nomura Research Institute Ltd.; quotes delayed 20 minutes. Canadian fund data provided by CANNEX Financial Exchanges Ltd.
LATEST POSTS
Try as the bears might, they couldn't break US stocks. But investors still face frothy prices and considerable headwinds.
FIDELITY VIEWPOINTS
- How to sell covered calls - Fidelity Investments
- Savvy year-end tax moves to consider now - Fidelity Investments
- Seven ways to prepare for tax changes
- Five reasons an annual review is crucial - Fidelity Investments
- Take a look at mid caps now - Fidelity Investments
- State of the sector: Health care - Fidelity Investments
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
ABOUT
Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.
Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.
Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.

