Netflix recovers from identity crisis
The company appears to be stabilizing its subscriber levels, but it has a lot to prove before it becomes the market darling it once was.
How many times does Netflix (NFLX) have to say it? The company doesn't want to replace your cable box. It can't afford to compete with everything on television.Instead, Netflix just wants to be an online premium network. Think HBO on the Web. It wants to offer big original shows that you can't find anywhere else, plus a ton of less significant programming that doesn't cost too much.
That's the company's new business model, like it or not. And the good news for Netflix is that people are coming to terms with it. Subscriber numbers are stabilizing, and so are customer satisfaction levels. Quite a change from the high-drama of 2011, when Netflix seemed to be doing everything it could to outrage customers.
"We are just another network competing for viewing time with, and licensing content from, other networks," CEO Reed Hastings said in a letter to shareholders Thursday.
One analyst points out "blemishes" with Netflix in the following video.
Post continues below.
Still, Netflix has turned a corner. Shares were up more than 21% Thursday to $115.64 after the company surprised with better quarterly earnings than Wall Street expected. Profit and revenue beat expectations. Netflix is now the top stock performer this year, The Wall Street Journal reports.
But perhaps more impressive was that Netflix added 610,000 subscribers in the U.S. in the fourth quarter. That's not enough to match the 800,000 subscribers who dumped the service in the previous quarter, but it's a move in the right direction.
Netflix ended the year with 24.4 million customers in the U.S., nearly 22 million of whom are streaming customers, paying $8 a month. A little more than 11 million pay to get DVDs by mail, and 8.4 million pay for both.
Netflix is done with DVD-only subscribers. It won't spend any more money attracting them or keeping them, and executives expect that category to decline every year.
Instead, the company is putting its money toward international expansion and original content. It has about 500,000 subscribers in Latin America, for example, and has recently launched in Britain and Ireland. It had 1.9 million total international streaming subscribers at the end of the year.
The quarterly performance was solid enough to win back the hearts of many analysts. Several upgraded the stock Thursday, and some significantly raised price targets in anticipation of continued progress from the company. Citigroup's Mark Mahaney raised his price target to $130 from $80, saying customer satisfaction seems to have stabilized.
But other analysts were skeptical. "Our ongoing concerns regarding building competition continue to feed into our longer-term questions surrounding the economic value of a streaming subscriber," wrote analysts from Canaccord Genuity, which is maintaining its "sell" rating on the stock.
Some of the concerns revolve around Netflix's push into developing its own programs, a model HBO has done so well with. Netflix describes its first original series, "Lilyhammer," as a "fish-out-of-water story set in Norway." What if that fish flops? Much is riding on the company's push into original content.
It's too early to say that Netflix is back. The company is certainly better off now than it was six months ago, but Netflix has a lot to prove before it becomes the highflying market darling it once was.
| Tags: | earningsKim PetersonNFLX |
Its good to see that Netflix has come to grips with their identity crisis. But the real question is going to remain, will the CONSUMERS come to grips with it? Will the consumers continue to pay for streaming content that gets lighter and lighter, and less and less? Will consumers gobble up a pay subscription service that seems to be leaning towards only original content and/or a very light supplement of other content? Will consumers pay for a subscription service that only offers B grade movies or movies that are really out of date?
I think subscribers numbers are stabilizing with the expectation that Netflix is going to continue in its current form, ie tv shows, older content etc. But if its move is to become an "HBO on the net" I think a lot of those current subscribers will jump ship. I don't see a mass exodus like what occurred recently, but I also do not see current subscribers sticking around if a) there is a move to LESS content with original programming (as Im reading from the article) or b) the current content is all there is and it stagnates.
I know I finally let my membership lapse and I dont think Im going to renew it for the foreseeable future. I'd like to see Netflix continue. But I'd also like to see a low cost alternative to cable where people are not screwed in their quest for entertainment.
Where are all the Netflix haters?
There were plenty here a few months ago.
But just like the people who defended their price change said, they are still a good entertainment value.
Netflix only responded to increased prices charged by content providers. They had to charge more, or cut quality.
And really, what still costs the same today as 5 years ago?
We keep our Netflix for two reasons, we love British TV programming and we go thru a Mystery series as these two elders wakeup thru the evening hrs. We each throw in a oldie but goodie movie now and then.
Speaking for myself, I love the Docs' from NGS to Nova and the Masterpiece series rarely disapoint. As long as I can get past years in viewing in a short time for this cost I will be a subscriber as I can afford it.
However, I want to remind Netflix they are, like Tivo and others, on top of the cost of access that is also getting out of control for this restricted dead income senior. My business model is set, your choice is if you turn me off or not in the future.
I do not miss the same ole same as DVD availibility as much as I thought, you can only watch so much and we have more time than most.
So some writers on this site will be bearish on Netflix (or Apple or any other stock) and others will be bullish. Readers are encouraged to agree or disagree, as you did with Netflix. And in the end, as you said, the best thing to do is keep thinking for yourself, research the heck out of something and make your own decisions.
MORE ON MSN MONEY
DATA PROVIDERS
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.
Japanese stock price data provided by Nomura Research Institute Ltd.; quotes delayed 20 minutes. Canadian fund data provided by CANNEX Financial Exchanges Ltd.
LATEST POSTS
Try as the bears might, they couldn't break U.S. stocks. But investors still face frothy prices and considerable headwinds.
FIDELITY VIEWPOINTS
- How to sell covered calls - Fidelity Investments
- Savvy year-end tax moves to consider now - Fidelity Investments
- Seven ways to prepare for tax changes
- Five reasons an annual review is crucial - Fidelity Investments
- Take a look at mid caps now - Fidelity Investments
- State of the sector: Health care - Fidelity Investments
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
ABOUT
Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.
Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.
Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.

