Amazon slumps on Kindle Fire worries
The 'Edsel' of tablets? It's too early to say.
As the Times noted, the Kindle Fire is enduring a torrent of negative reviews on the company's website, of all places. This is a huge headache for Amazon, which is counting on the Fire to fuel future growth. "Slightly more than a third of the 4,500 reviewers of the Fire on Amazon have given it mixed to negative reviews, three stars or fewer," according to the newspaper.
Analysts had high hopes for the Kindle Fire when it launched in November, forecasting sales of 5 million by year's end. One of the reasons why Wall Street was so bullish was the tablet's price -- $199 versus the $499 entry-level price for the Apple(AAPL) iPad. The problem with such a notion is that it's not a fair comparison. Remember, the iPad can do everything that a Fire can, but not vice versa.
My wife and I decided this weekend to buy an iPad. Although it is twice as expensive as the Fire, it is also twice as good. We found the Barnes & Noble (BKS) Nook to be inferior to the Fire. Like many consumers, we are not oblivious to price. Quality, though, is important. The iPad, to many minds -- ours included, is by far the best product.
After reading the Timesstory, I realized that we made the right decision. One surprising tidbit was that some people found the Kindle Fire's performance as an e-reader to be worse than the original Kindle. Amazon, of course, told the Times that fixes were in the works.
The parallels to the Edsel, a car brand that flamed out during the 1950s, are hard to avoid. Like the Kindle Fire, Ford Motor's (F) Edsel over-promised and under-delivered. The Edsel was hurt by quality problems that earned it the nickname: "Every Day Something Else Leaks." Owners of the Kindle Fire are complaining about the device's lack of an external volume control and the poor placement of the "off" switch, according to the Times.
Ford pulled the plug on Edsel after three model years (1958, 1959 and 1960) and about 118,000 vehicles. According to Failure magazine, Ford learned from its mistakes. "Many of the new technologies developed for and charged to the Edsel’s budget were applied to future Ford models," the publication says. "For instance, the Edsel was the first car to have self-adjusting brakes; by 1962 all Fords were equipped with self-adjusting brakes."
The next few months will be critical for the Kindle Fire. Early adapters are a key constituency for tech companies because their opinions are solicited by potential customers. Amazon had better figure out a way to make its aggrieved tablet owners happy or risk having the product wind up on the scrap heap of technology history -- along with Microsoft's (MSFT) Zune, the LaserDisc and the Apple Lisa.
--Jonathan Berr expects that his 5-year-old son will not be eager to share the family iPad.
Get with the program MSN and allow review material that is factual, this is garbage! Comparing to the Edsal? You have to be kidding me!
Edit for the above post by JFW3: Yes, you're right... it's the difference between a Mercedes and a Honda. BUT, there's something to be said about the average consumer who can't afford the Mercedes you speak of. Honda? Last time I checked, it was one of the most sold vehicles on the planet. Thanks for solidifying the Fire's usefulness to the average consumer. Your issues are well... eh, trivial. You get all those "nice and advanced" features when you buy a Mercedes.
I've had no wifi connectivity issues with the Fire, camera means nothing, app selection is pretty decent (and will continue to get better), touch screen seems to work ok and bluetooth didn't matter since we only used it for an e-reader (which is what it is) while using the other functions it has.
My question is... why are people comparing this to the iPad to begin with? There really is no comparison. They're two totally different units aimed at two different users. Those of you who think this is an iPad killer have not used an iPad.
No harm intended jfw3, I hear what you're saying. But people need to understand... you get what you pay for.
I do not yet have my Kindle Fire but I will soon. I agree that they are not comparing apples to apples. First off the wonderful(haha choke choke) ipad is a tablet!, the Fire is a get this...an e-reader! Above all else it is an e-reader with bonus features. The ipad is a tablet that can be used as an e-reader. Everyone needs to stop comparing the Fire to every other tablet, they are not even in the same category.
i would like to start by mentioning i'm an avid apple fan and ipad lover. but i also have the kindle fire and like it very much too . i actually took the time to research what it 's capable of doing and not doing before i purchased it. i'm what's called a "informed buyer" and i got what i paid for. the problem with the NY times article and most of the dissatisfied customers is that they want ipad functionality but are to CHEAP to pay for it. i compared google searches on both my ipad2 and fire, there was little difference in speed if any. the fire plays video well and the picture is great. what else do people want for $200.00? dont buy a ford focus and expect bmw 5 series quality. the same goes for the ipad vs the fire. know what you are purchasing and chances are you will be happy.
What a biased article. Why not compare the iPad to my laptop computer, they are both portable devices. My laptop has a bigger screen, more memory, more storage, better video, better sound and costs about the same. Although it might be a bit heavier it beats the iPad in just about every category. Oh wait, this would be like comparing apples (no pun intended) to oranges just like this author did.
Almost every reputable tech reviewer has given the Kindle Fire a big thumbs up. I'll stick with the expert opinions, review the devices myself and then make an educated decision on buying a product.
I am one happy Fire customer!!!!
Note to Amazon Staff - keep up the good work! PS I have purchase two more for my teenaged kids as xmas gifts.
READ THIS REVIEW, IF YOU ARE THINKING OF BUYING...
Okay, here is the deal, I arrived at the decision to purchase the FIRE in the same way that many of you probably did. I was wanting to purchase a "reader" for our family. NOT another computer, BUT a reader. We already had computers and smart phones (mini computers) galore in our home. While looking at readers and comparing prices, you cant help but be drawn to all the extra stuff this reader does for $199. You mean to tell me for an extra $50-$100, depending on the reader price, I can get the FIRE and not only read virtually anything, but be able to play all the cool games with my kid and surf the net..? DANG, its a no brainer! I am not looking to buy another computer for the house that will defeat the purpose of having the others that we use for business and bill pay. I dont care that it is not an iPAD, its not important to me to put my nose in the air and tell everyone "my farts dont stink because I have an apple and that makes me better than you"!
Bottom line: $199 is a GREAT DEAL for this fun device. Very happy with purchase.
By the way sir, read your article and something does stink...
I pre orderd and got my fire on the 16th of November, I could not be more pleased with the way it performs. I looked at several different things before I ordered and the fire fit my needs. I dont need a computer to carry around, nor do I want a phone pad. As of yet I have not found anything that it is supposed to do and won't. PEOPLE YOU GET WHAT YOU PAY FOR!!!. I am very happy with it. Before you order, do your own homework and make up your mind. This article must have been written by someone who plans to make Orange juice from Apples or an agenda of their own.
Amazon, if you are reading this thanks and keep up the good work.
as always, just another comparison to the iPad by someone who loves iCrap.
Most of the 1st person reviews I've gotten rave about the new kindle
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
Bill Stiritz owns more than 5% of the company, and has experienced an estimated $145 million in paper losses on his investment.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.
Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.
Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.