Have weak sales hurt Wal-Mart's value?

The retail giant doesn't always get the credit it deserves for operating one of the most efficient businesses in the world.

By TheStreet Staff May 23, 2013 2:27PM

Wal-Mart store in Secaucus, New Jersey, Jin Lee, Bloomberg via Getty Imagesthestreet logoBy Richard Saintvilus


On April 2, when we last discussed (TheStreet) retail giant Wal-Mart (WMT), I made a case for why I thought the stock was undervalued despite (at the time) posting 12% gains.

In that article, while comparing the relative performances of rivals Costco (COST) and Target (TGT), I said:

"For now, from an investment perspective, the stock is still trading at an attractive valuation. When compared to Costco and Target, which are both trading at higher P/E ratios, a case can be made that Wal-Mart is undervalued by at least 10%. With continued operational improvements and a recovering economy, patient investors should expect shares to approach the lower $80s by the second half of the year."

Since then, the stock has gained as much as 6% when factoring the 52-week high of $79.96 reached on May 15. While I'm not ready to change direction on my bullish sentiment, I was nonetheless disappointed by Wal-Mart's weak first-quarter sales, which prompted shares to fall by as much as 3%.


Consolidated revenue was just 1% higher year over year to $113.4 billion. The company was slightly affected by currency exchange rate, which otherwise would have boosted revenue closer to 2%. It's still not a huge number, but given the massive global reach of this company revenue results needs to be kept in perspective. Besides, once you've reached the maturity level of Wal-Mart, it's the bottom line that carries the stock.


Nevertheless, despite decent growth (relative to expectations), theretail giant saw weak sales in its U.S. stores, with no growth. For that matter, the company's dominant Sam's Club, which rivals large discount outlets like Costco, posted an anemic year-over-year growth of half of 1% (when excluding fuel). However, the weakness in U.S. was partially offset by better results abroad. 

International operations posted 2.9% revenue growth, which nearly doubled in constant currency. "Comps," which is another way to say "same-store sales" -- the metric that tracks revenue results of stores that have been opened at least one year, declined in the U.S. by 1.4%. Here again, this could be a macro issue and not necessarily reflective of poor performance by management. Bears might disagree.


However, I'm willing to excuse Wal-Mart here because even strong brands like McDonald's (MCD) posted a 1% decline in U.S. comps. I don't think anyone is ready to say that McDonald's long-term outlook is on the decline. Even with Wal-Mart's 2% decline in store traffic, the company still reported diluted earnings per share of $1.14, up close to 5% year over year.


What this means is that management is doing a great job navigating this rough patch - helped (in part) by an aggressive cost control, which helped stabilize operating margin, while yielding a 1% improvement in operating income.


The question here is, how much of Wal-Mart's first-quarter results should be blamed on recent macro events such as the 2% increase in the Social Security payroll tax rolled out at the beginning of the year? Not to mention there was the delay in income tax refunds; the company warned back in January that its earnings results may be adversely affected.


These two events point to one thing: consumer spending, which always matters to Wal-Mart. While the 2% decline in store traffic is discouraging, investors realize that "this is Wal-Mart." What I mean is, we've been here before and the company has overcome much worse. The fact is people aren't going to suddenly stop shopping for food and household goods. Not many stores can compete with Wal-Mart on pricing and convenience. 

For that matter, management said Wal-Mart was able to gain market share in categories like food, consumable and health and wellness products. This is the second consecutive quarter in which Wal-Mart has done so.


Management also expects modest improvements going forward as earnings-per-share guidance for the second-quarter expected to come in the range of $1.22 to $1.27, which represents year-over-year growth of 3% to 7%.

Bottom line

Macro concerns can weigh heavily on Wal-Mart, which would then impact upon the stock. But given the company's immense size, which serves as protection, the shares are not going to sway that drastically from one quarter to the next. Besides, Wal-Mart doesn't always get the credit it deserves for operating one of the most efficient businesses in the world.


The fact that shares are trading at just 13 times fiscal 2014 EPS estimates, which is almost two points below the industry P/E average, presents not great but decent value. The stock's 16% year-to-date gains notwithstanding, over the course of the next six to 12 months, investors should expect additional gains of 5% to 7%.


At the time of publication the author had no position in any of the stocks mentioned.


More from TheStreet.com

May 23, 2013 3:32PM
Seems like these days Wal-Mart isn't any better of a deal than a lot of other places.  Did the other places just lower their prices or did wal-mart raise theirs?
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?


Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.


StockScouter rates stocks from 1 to 10, with 10 being the best, using a system of advanced mathematics to determine a stock's expected risk and return. Ratings are displayed on a bell curve, meaning there will be fewer ratings of 1 and 10 and far more of 4 through 7.

123 rated 1
262 rated 2
480 rated 3
651 rated 4
649 rated 5
629 rated 6
616 rated 7
496 rated 8
346 rated 9
111 rated 10

Top Picks

TAT&T Inc9



Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.

Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.

Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.