CEOs playing the blame game

It's OK for executives to sound off against the government -- if they deliver the goods regardless.

By Jim Cramer Aug 4, 2011 9:24AM

jim cramerthe streetWe all know that Washington, D.C., has become the enemy of business. Its pro-labor orientation, its insistence on more regulation (including environmental rules that are expensive to comply with) and its regular bashing of businesses like banking and tourism (think Vegas or the private jet industry) hurt new hiring and business formation.

 

No one can fault business people for grousing about how Washington has become a big impediment to corporate profits. But does that mean everyone has the right to blame Washington for weaker returns? Does it mean that chief executive officers should be sounding off about Washington headwinds on their conference calls?

 

First, I never mind hearing it. When so many leftists are demanding that big businesses hire more people here, you want execs to point out that when Boeing (BA) decided to build a new plant in a state that's not that hospitable to unions, South Carolina, the National Labor Relations Board went after it with hobnail boots.

 

Can you blame companies for wanting to build factories overseas to contain labor costs rather than subject themselves to the government's attempts to help unions organize?

 

If President Barack Obama believes part of his job is to help unions organize at a time when businesses are trying to figure out where to expand, you have to expect, at a time of tremendous globalization, that the new plants will be built in countries more hospitable to the best returns on investment. It's business, not patriotism, speaking. No goodness of the heart either -- not with public shareholders.

 

Related Articles

I especially don't mind when execs who triumph despite the government sound off about it. You had to admire Steve Wynn, an old Democrat who built Wynn Resorts (WYNN) into the greatest casino company on earth, when he criticized the government for driving his expansions elsewhere. I got a kick out of it when he praised the Communist Chinese for being more capitalistic than our own country's regime.

 

I also like companies that say they make money despite Washington's predilections, as PPG's (PPG) terrific CEO Chuck Bunch said Tuesday night on "Mad Money."

 

But I am not comfortable with someone like David Farr, the CEO of Emerson (EMR), who has missed earnings projections for three straight quarters, sounding off on Washington as one reason business isn't as good as it should be. I think you lose your standing to carp if you haven't executed well, and Emerson has certainly executed poorly compared with others in its cohort.

Don't get me wrong. I thought Farr made sense in his warnings about what's wrong in Washington. But I want to know what's wrong at Emerson. When you blow the quarter away, not only do you get bragging rights, but you get grousing rights. However, when you don't meet expectations, the complaining just doesn't sit well with me.

 

If Farr crushes the numbers next time, I won't mind hearing that the government is in the way. Until then, the whines feel like alibis to me. Steve Wynn, sound off all you want. David Farr, save it for when you're winning.

 

At the time of publication, Cramer had no positions in the stocks mentioned.

 

Jim Cramer is a co-founder of TheStreet and contributes daily market commentary to the financial news network’s sites.

 

Follow Cramer's trades for his Charitable Trust.

16Comments
Aug 4, 2011 12:10PM
avatar
Seems to me the only "People" with money are the corporations.  They won't invest in the USA because the government will not give them license to do what they will (they lost that trust a long time ago).  They also need welfare and tax cuts to make more money than they already make (record year) so they can pat each other on the back with exorbitant bonuses ( they won't work for less than they are).  I guess this is a stalemate and we just continue to spiral down until we the little insignificant people will work for Chinese wages and backstab each other for what jobs exist.
Aug 4, 2011 2:42PM
avatar
> Can you blame companies for wanting to build factories overseas to
> contain labor costs rather than subject themselves to the government's
> attempts to help unions organize?

A big resounding YES. That kind of short term thinking is beyond foolish. Driving their own customers into poverty and then wondering why business is so bad... that's what today's executives are doing.

Not that it's a surprise. Back when I was in college what struck me most was the intellectual chasm between students of hard sciences and business majors. We put the dimwits in charge, now we get what we deserve.
Aug 4, 2011 2:03PM
avatar

Cramer, close up shop, you're through.  You said yesterday or the day before to go on a buying spree, just before the market fell off a cliff that has been clearly been coming via technical analysis.... or at least the risk has been there and has now come true. 

 

Are you delivering the sheeple's money to your hedgie buddies, or are you just bipolar?  My guess is both. 

 

You're done, my friend.

Aug 4, 2011 2:26PM
avatar

I agree with Cramer in part, but would go further.  It is fine for management to make "gobs" of compensation; BUT let them pay respectable taxes.  Since we are currently in 2 wars, I wonder what they would say about the level of taxes during WWII--90% as I recall reading.

 

Perhaps unions can be abusive,  but who else is there to stick up for the working persons?

 

Fortunately we have a President who is doing his best to right a bad situation, but I question his efforts to "carry water on both shoulders".

 

Hopefully all of us can retain our "day jobs" in these troubled times.

 

GALL

@ Seattle

Aug 4, 2011 4:52PM
avatar
Either US corporations are citizens (Citizens United), or they aren't.  Which is it?  If they prefer a Cayman Islands PO Box, then it should be where they relocate all their HQ people.  These people benefit everyday when they use publicly provided infrastructure, benefit from publicly educated employees, advertise to potential consumers over the public airways, benefit from  reliable postal, energy transmission, and top notch medical systems, and every other benefit that accrues to those CEO's who live in this country, as well as their management and staffs.  It is cheaper in China, but how many of them could find all of the above and move there instead?  The ones who complain the loudest worry about what's in it for them.  Why don't we hear that from the Gateses, Warren Buffett's, Bloombergs, etc.?  I'm tired of all of the winning.  They need to man up and move if they don't care about the quality of life the rest of us make sacrifices for each and every day. 
Aug 4, 2011 1:07PM
avatar
Gosh truer words have not been said in the last 18 months....As far back as the 70's when I worked in Hospitals the Unions drove jobs away...Only a certain amount of money was coming in, and the Unions demanded more, so like most Union people they shot themselves in foot and then tried to blame Management. and the Corporations...The Nurses Union in 4 hospitals I worked at did exactly that...The money had to come from somewhere so in order to meet payroll they shut down three floors which was over 100 beds per floor and went to OutPatient care putting 80 Nurses out of work, as well as Nurses Aides, Orderlies, Clerks, Lab Techs, and other assorted personnel...And then they had the gall to blame Hospital Management for the plight....I finally got tired of losing my Job due to the Nurses Union and got a County Job.. Well that County had an Association for years and everyone got at least a COLA every year and they seriously worked to find the best Medical Planst and in some facilties Lunch was provided for cost! Well SEIU came and got the non-producers all riled up and the County went Union and we never got a raise for the next 9 years because their demands were too high..They listened to some blowhard in another State instead of the Rank file so when the money crunch happend guess who suffered and then to add to the Insult the Union raised the dues......Got to love a Lefty....Never taking responsibility for their own screw ups just like our current President....It's those rich Republicans...Well In L.A. there are thousands of Rich Demoncrats, and in fact I recently read the highest concentration of Rich Demoncrats was in Washington D.C. followed by somewhere in Maryland where all the Corporations have offices and Lobbyists....So lets finally admit it..The Demoncrats are financially inept and want everyone else to pay for their mistakes and wrong thinking..It is about time they grew and faced the music they wrote....
Aug 4, 2011 3:06PM
avatar

Cramer  lost  his  cred  in  late  2008  when  he  declared  the recession  over  just as it was  getting  started;   then  during the  same  time  he called a   'buy,buy,buy !'   on Bank  of  America

when  it was starting  to  come  back ,  ignoring  its  bad  mortgages,  and  the  purchase  of Countywide.  B of A's   stock  price  hasn't  gone anywhere.  Heck.  I'm  an amateur  and  knew enough  not  to  make statements like  that.

Aug 4, 2011 2:13PM
avatar
The worst article I have read in a while.
avatar

This is probably one of the best and most articulate articles I have read from Mr. Cramer. It really doesn't sound like he wrote it.   

What makes me think that is there is not enough "Market Technical" jargon or dropped thoughts to give it a "Cramer Flavor".   Ghost writer, perhaps?

 

Aug 4, 2011 10:02PM
avatar

I want our corps. to do swimmingly well, both here and abroad.  I want them to innovate instead of just sitting back and holding onto cash.  Where is the leadership in that?  We have real problems in this country, but where are the solutions?  All those entities who were bailed out...   Where is their contribution now, after all those record profits?  When do they repay their debt and show some responsibility to the entity that gave them a hand up (big government/we the tax payers).  

 

What have they done to break the cycle of this jobless "recovery".  How have they invested to lay the groundwork for a better future, for their own company, which by extension could benefit  this country and its citizens? 

 

We need to challenge our children.  The parents have obviously grown musty and lost their clever edge. 

Aug 4, 2011 1:05PM
avatar

Liberals in government and unions forced businesses out of the country and now want to steal money from people that worked hard to earn it.  The basic problem is many in this country did not take care of their careers, skills and finances and now want to use someone else as their excuse.  Why do you whine about how much money someone else makes? (It is actually very greedy).   If we took every penny from the top 2% of wage earners it would not make a dent in the deficit.  If we did, their would be someone else to rob next, how about grandma and grandpa?

Aug 5, 2011 6:56AM
avatar

CEO's are in the LOOPHOLE Union, and most likely not paying their fair share if US taxes. With such a unique union they should realize as finger pointing goes, the finger is most likely pointing in their direction.  

 

Aug 4, 2011 3:05PM
avatar

hey dumbo...how are your "accidentally high yielders" holding up?

 

how is the much hated by you sds doing ?

 

that's right......yield is not protection......shorting and prudent hedging is the correct way

Aug 5, 2011 4:15AM
avatar
I think you are so anti union that your vision is clouded.
avatar

Apparently is seems there are people here that believe a company should break even at the end of the year.    Corporation and for that matter anyone sell their products for what people are willing to pay for them.   If you were to buy a product and could get it cheaper and just as good somewhere else, where would you buy?   You wouldn't buy just because it is from your own country or your own neighborhood.  

 

They tried that in the Great Depression and put the whole world into a Greater Depression and eventually the Second World War.

 

To keep companies here in America, we need to lower the money they give to the Gov't to less than what other countries are offering them as taxes.   Some countries will actually co-sponsor a company just to have the jobs.    How can a Corporation here in America compete with that when we have one of the highest Corporate Tax Rates in the World?

Aug 4, 2011 10:19AM
avatar

Hi Jim,

 

I do not disagree with you very often, but I might on this one. Here is why...I think the negative affect of the Obama administration goes beyond just the specific regulatory and anti-business actions taken. The mere existance of this type of admininstration cast a dark cloud over the entire economy (and to many is downright scary).  This cloud is like "dark matter" recently discovered in space...you cannot see it but you know it is there.

 

Steve

Cincinnati

Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

DATA PROVIDERS

Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.

STOCK SCOUTER

StockScouter rates stocks from 1 to 10, with 10 being the best, using a system of advanced mathematics to determine a stock's expected risk and return. Ratings are displayed on a bell curve, meaning there will be fewer ratings of 1 and 10 and far more of 4 through 7.

123
123 rated 1
273
273 rated 2
482
482 rated 3
661
661 rated 4
635
635 rated 5
639
639 rated 6
619
619 rated 7
489
489 rated 8
277
277 rated 9
166
166 rated 10
12345678910

Top Picks

SYMBOLNAMERATING
AAPLAPPLE Inc10
ATVIACTIVISION BLIZZARD Inc10
BIDUBAIDU Inc10
CTSHCOGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS10
LUVSOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO.10
More

VIDEO ON MSN MONEY

ABOUT

Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.

Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.

Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.