Consumer Reports has harsh words for GM's new Volt

The magazine criticizes General Motors' flagship car for its inefficiency, its short range and its 'annoying' charge time.

By Kim Peterson Mar 1, 2011 4:11PM
Chevrolet Volt (© ROBYN BECK/AFP/Getty Images)Consumer Reports magazine just dropped a bomb on General Motors' (GM) flagship car.

The Chevrolet Volt, which GM has put its heart and soul into since emerging from bankruptcy, isn't that great of an electric or gas vehicle, said David Champion, senior director of Consumer Reports' auto testing center, according to The Detroit News.

"When you are looking at purely dollars and cents, it doesn't really make a lot of sense," Champion added. "This is going to be a tough sell to the average consumer."

Ouch. And so ends the Volt's honeymoon. The plug-in car had a great coming-out party, winning the coveted "car of the year" award in January at the North American International Auto Show. It was also named car of the year by Motor Trend Magazine.

Post continues after video:
But the magazine that the Volt really needed in its corner -- Consumer Reports -- was not as easily thrilled. In its testing, Consumer Reports said the Volt only made it 25 to 27 miles on electric power alone, the News reports. That testing was done during a harsh winter in Connecticut.

GM says that in better weather, the Volt can get at least 40 miles on electric power. The car has a gasoline engine that can pick up where the electric power fails.

Consumer Reports wasn't done yet. Champion said that a hybrid like the Prius from Toyota (TM) may be more suitable. If you drive 70 miles, he said, the Prius will get you more miles to the gallon than the Volt, the News reports.

And the five-hour recharge time on the Volt was "annoying," he said. He also said the heating system in the car was less than ideal.

"You have seat heaters, which keep your body warm, but your feet get cold and your hands get cold," he said, according to the News.

But Consumer Reports isn't going to make a recommendation on the Volt yet. To do so, it needs data from at least 100 subscribers, and a year of reliability studies, the News reports.

Tags: gm
14Comments
Mar 1, 2011 5:14PM
avatar
THose awards "car of the year" are not "deserved", but simple marketing scam to mislead potential buyers. Consumer Reports is the only valuable source for product reliability, and people should use that as guide...
Mar 2, 2011 8:59AM
avatar

Consumer Reports does not rely on advertising income, all those other reviews were for magazines that derive most of their income from automobile industry advertising.

 

So while Consumer Reports may not have the most scientific sampling paradigm, I trust  them way more than the other magazines, at least they are not in the pay of the people they are reviewing.

Mar 1, 2011 10:12PM
avatar

another GM junk pony.   This is why we will wind up kissing 50 billion goodbye, shareholders will kiss 30 billion goodbye and the UAW will tell you why you need them to keep the economy going and another 50 billion please. 

Mar 2, 2011 12:30PM
avatar
I remember another brand new Chevy that won MT's prestigious COTY award. The 1980 Citation.  They sure nailed that one.  [/Sarcasm]

:)
Mar 2, 2011 2:06AM
avatar
I like Consumer Reports.  They typically know what they are talking about.  I have used their car advice before buying for over 20 years and I have NEVER  been let down.  I didn't need them to tell me the VOLT is a turd.  Anyone with any sense can see that.  For $22k  the Prius gets better mileage for half the price.  Only a fool or maybe a UNION FOOL would buy the Volt.  The only people pushing this car are the ones making it or those who stand to gain from its sales.  Don't be a fool, stay away from it.
Mar 2, 2011 9:35AM
avatar

motortrend car of the year

thats a joke right?  theyre car of the year has been for sale for as long as i can emember

Mar 2, 2011 4:26PM
avatar
Why would anyone buy a Volt for $42,000 when you could get a Prius for $22,000? Sure, Uncle Sam will provide a credit for &7,000, but that is still about $12,000 more. And the Volt certainly isn't any better.
Mar 1, 2011 9:17PM
avatar

The Volt is not a good product for GM  as it cost is very high and the electric range is very short.

GM should have made a smaller car costing much less.  GM don't need another sports car.

They need a consumer car and sell hundreds or thousands of them and make a lot of profit.

GM is not a Custom Shop.

Jan 15, 2013 5:28PM
avatar

The car might be ok for some one that drives very little, but for some one that drive constanly, There will be no time to charge the car.

Sorry, But I am not impressed.

plus the 220V, it sounds like that car was designed for Europe and not the US

Mar 5, 2012 6:07PM
avatar

I used Consumer Reports when I bought my TV, Blu-ray player, and tires for my truck. Every recommendation was spot on. That is the only unbias reporting service I will read.

The Volt is a POS.

Mar 8, 2011 5:23PM
avatar
As for AAA1000, their opinions are not all "wrong". They're all "bought".
Mar 2, 2011 12:44PM
avatar

If the Volt was a Toyota consumers reports would have nothing but praise for it left and right. 

 

Toyota can do nothing wrong and GM can do nothing right to consumers reports.

 

Thank god most people have seen the light of day when it comes to this sorry excuse for a rating agency and stopped listening to their BS reports.

Mar 1, 2011 6:36PM
avatar
I will NEVER use any advice from Consumer Reports, especially when it comes to autos.   They only collect data from subscribers, which is an unscientific method of collecting data.  How come Motor Trend and other knowledgeable sources of car reviews speak so highly of the Volt?  Are they all wrong?
Mar 1, 2011 9:10PM
avatar
Consumer Reports like to praise  all the Asian cars while criticising American vehicles!!  They Suck
Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

DATA PROVIDERS

Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.

STOCK SCOUTER

StockScouter rates stocks from 1 to 10, with 10 being the best, using a system of advanced mathematics to determine a stock's expected risk and return. Ratings are displayed on a bell curve, meaning there will be fewer ratings of 1 and 10 and far more of 4 through 7.

113
113 rated 1
279
279 rated 2
416
416 rated 3
647
647 rated 4
548
548 rated 5
513
513 rated 6
669
669 rated 7
516
516 rated 8
317
317 rated 9
113
113 rated 10
12345678910

Top Picks

SYMBOLNAMERATING
KOGKODIAK OIL & GAS Corp10
UPLULTRA PETROLEUM Corp10
TAT&T Inc9
COPCONOCOPHILLIPS9
DVNDEVON ENERGY CORPORATION9
More

VIDEO ON MSN MONEY

ABOUT

Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.

Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.

Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.