Amazon's new Kindle threatens Google

The most immediate impact of the Fire will be felt not by Apple, but by competitors such as Research In Motion, Motorola and HTC.

By Trefis Nov 16, 2011 5:38PM
Ever since Amazon (AMZN) announced in September it would sell its Kindle Fire for a mere $199, the tablet has drummed up a lot of interest from developers and consumers alike.

A recent study by Retrevo.com suggests that more people are interested in purchasing the Fire than Apple's (AAPL) tried-and-true iPad this holiday season. We believe this poses a bigger threat to tablets from Motorola (MMI), HTC and other carriers using Google's (GOOG) Android software.

About half of the developers surveyed by Appcelerator and IDC in North America said they considered the Kindle Fire their primary target, on par with interest for the iPad prior to its launch in April 2010. Pre-orders for Amazon's tablet have remained strong and the company may have recently increased its orders to more than 5 million units by the end of 2011. Amazon is shipping the Fire starting this week.


Early signs do indicate that the iPad's first true competitor may well have arrived on the scene. Lending more fuel to speculation that the tablet will suffer at the hands of its latest rival are rumors that Apple has asked suppliers to reduce shipments of supplies for its iPad and iPhone. Those rumors have weighed on the stock recently.


However, we maintain our price estimate of $502 for the Apple stock, which is about 30% above market price. Our estimate for Amazon of $233 is just under 10% ahead of the market price.


See our complete analysis for Apple |Amazon here


Kindle Fire more than just another Android tablet


The Kindle Fire has managed to captivate the consumer electronics industry with its $199 price point, significantly undercutting other tablets. The lower price point, coupled with Amazon's well-known brand and large media library, are poised to turn the Fire into the second hit tablet after the iPad.


There is no doubt that Amazon will shake up the market for tablets, possibly rendering the $500 tablet obsolete gradually. However, we feel that the most immediate impact will be felt not by Apple but by its competitors such as Research In Motion's Playbook and pricey Android rivals such as Motorola's Xoom and HTC's Flyer. Why spend $600 for an Android tablet from present Google partners if you can find most of what you need in a $199 Kindle Fire?


Apple's rivals in the tablet market are sizable but they haven't been able to significantly dent iPad's demand so far. However, most of these tablets, including Kindle Fire, run on Google's Android, which makes Google Apple's major competitor.


On the surface, Kindle Fire should be good news for Android as it runs on Android. The reality is that Kindle Fire is not a pure Android product. Amazon has taken some of the basic code of Android and built its own operating system on top of Android, thereby differentiating itself from the Android pack.


Amazon Kindle Units Sold

Fragmentation a key downside to Android


Fragmentation is the biggest enemy of any operating system. As time goes on and Google continues to develop Android in one direction while Amazon continues to take the Kindle Fire down its own unique path, the two platforms will be less and less alike, forcing developers to choose between Android and Kindle's OS. At some point in the future, Kindle Fire might pose a threat to other tablets running the very operating system it had once drawn its identity from.


Amazon is also not using Google Android Market. Appstore 2.0 from Amazon is fully integrated in Kindle and appears to be a much more user friendly implementation compared to Android Market from Google.


Apple's Average iPad Pricing

While Google and Android-based tablets face the biggest threat from Kindle Fire, Apple will eventually start to feel the effects of a lower-priced competitor. We do not see a 7-inch tablet providing an iPad-like user experience, but as tablets see mass adoption and the market matures to include customers who are far more price sensitive than the early-adopter crowd, Apple may well need to do a rethink on the iPad's price.


16Comments
Nov 16, 2011 7:49PM
avatar
The Fire is nothing more than a glorified reader, designed primarily to consume Amazon content.  On the other end is the iPad.  Kind of a slick little device (and expensive).  Still, it won't do what I want it to do.  So far, I haven't seen a tablet that accommodates my needs with regard to syncing my personal data.  They all want me to adapt to their way of doing things rather than make the tablet adaptable to me.  I'm planning to use my notebook computer into the foreseeable future. 
Nov 17, 2011 10:51AM
avatar

kindlemad  (or anyone):

can't seem to get a good answer on this.  does the kindle handle Flash?

 

That is my wife's bigest complaint about the ipad (we got it as a gift).  A lot of the sites she likes have flash on it and this is frustrating on an ipad.

 

I know why Apple doesn't like Flash, but wonder how Kindle (or any Android based tablet) handles it.

Nov 17, 2011 12:06PM
avatar
There is simply no comparison between and ipad and fire.Each device appeals to a different economic level of consumer and the capability of each differs greatly. 
Additionally, the media keeps touting the Fire's $199 cost. There are already countless tablets from reputable manufacture's that are much more powerful and productive than the Fire and for less cost. Just search the internet on low priced tablets. Try the ViewSonics 7e at buy.com for $169. Has camera, flash and hdmi.  Why doesn't the media mention the availability of these others.  So, I am not understanding in the nonsensical hype about the Fire. Based on its abilities, it is over priced. Bezos it the ultimate used car salesman. 
The Fire competes with Barnes & Nobles Nook Color. A look at the nook, shows that it is far superior.New Nook Color which blows the Kindle away in terms of productivity and performance is only $49 more. And it can be purchased and serviced in a beautiful store. I believe that even a budget conscious consumer would spend a bit more to buy a superior product.
The hype that you hear about the Fire is once again media hype. Amazon actually pays the media to write positive hype articles about their products. The reality is that Amazon has hired the manufacture of Rim's Playbook to make a close copy and Amazon put their name on it. It is an under powered device that is designed to lock a purchaser into buying strictly from Amazon.
That is dictatorship in my opinion. I prefer to buy a device that lets me buy from whoever I want. Wasn't the internet supposed to level the playing field and offer freedom of choice. Amazon want to take that choice away from consumers.
Amazon is perceived as having cheaper prices than competitors.  In reality, they are often more expensive and their price for an item can sometimes change hourly, due to their software which constantly scans for demand. It  then adjusts he price accordingly.  I do not wish to do business with a company that is constantly trying to take advantage of me.
I recently needed to buy several items for the house and could not find them locally. Thus I searched the internet. One of the items I needed had a list price of $199.50. It was listed for sale at Amazon for $159.50 free shipping. Scrolling down a bit further, I found it for $129.99 free shipping at another vendor.Then I went to  "thefind.com"  It gave me a list of all the vendors that had the item. I ended up buying from a vendor for $109.99 free shipping, no sales tax. The same exact item for $50 less than Amazon. The same situation occurred for the other items I needed and collectively I saved nearly $300 by not buying at Amazon.
What if I told you about a company that earned 10 billion in a given quarter. Well what if I told you that out of the ten billion, that same company only gets to keep 140 million, yep million. Thats a profit margin of a grocery store. Then what if I told you that that same company trades at a P/E of 112 times  Would you invest in it. That company is Amazon.  
Just think, on a meager 140 million in profit, Bezos has become a billionaire. How? With the profit that is left at Amazon, he could not take a large salary. You guessed it, he made his billions selling his overvalued stock that has been continually hyped by wall street
I was at Amazon's investor conference in New York and I thought it comical that Bezos was parading around with this kindle Fire in his hand calling it revolutionary. He is laughing all the way to the bank once again taking advantage of naive consumers.He should have said that we are going to lose $50 for every Fire we sell and do you know why? Because we are going to get the consumer to buy it and then lock them into buying everything from Amazon.  
Nov 17, 2011 5:09AM
avatar
The new nook app for Kindle is brilliant - you can get all the Android apps free now!  We got the nook app download instructions from www.kindlemad.com through google.

I love my new Kindle!
Nov 17, 2011 9:50AM
avatar

Not sure from where these data is, but kindle's price is for a 7inch device and the dual core is not a high end one. Its a mere reader that is running on android. Unless its rooted, developers don't have a go to actually develop native apps for it.

 

I would wait for windows 8, its a better platform that will exist amongst most of the devices out there.

Dec 2, 2011 2:32PM
avatar
Beware! KIndle Fire is a US only proposition. Amazon, for some obscure reason, does not let you download apps if you are outside of the US. Apple's iPad does not have that limitation.
I ordered a KF from Chile and I'm stuck.  I hope some clever programmer finds a way around this ****.
Nov 17, 2011 1:40PM
avatar
@AgainstGovernmentWaste

It goes to show exactly how effective Apple's marketing has been when you assume that the tablet market consists only of iPads. I agree with you that, to the largest extent an iPad may seem like it is either an oversized iPhone, or a toy of sorts, but this is simply an opinion with a first blush glance. Compound that with the elite of the GED's (Google Experience Devices) like Motorola's XOOM, which have an even larger capacity for the power user, and I would like to seriously hear from you, what it is you believe that you CAN do on your laptop, that you think you CANT do on a tablet.

Unless you're a developer for Windows based applications, (which to some extent is possible with a simple text editor; tablet has? Check) and need to compile on the fly or while traveling, then the reality of it is, anything you CAN do on your laptop, you CAN do on a tablet.

Couch potatoes? I know personally I'm an avid outdoorsman and use the built-in barometer, GPS, compass, and 4G while trekking through places like the cascades and apalachian's in my XOOM to keep my entire journey well focused AND for life safety. With a built-in barometer, places that start to approach treeline and the mountains creating their own weather make it very unreliable from typical online weather broadcasts and very APPEALING to have a mechanism by which to garner that on-the-spot weather as well as the other functions of trekking AND corporate VPN capability et al, all in one device. I strongly suggest you keep from pigeon-holing others by your own assessment of their leanings if you want credibility as a forum commenter though. While I respect your opinion of the devices themselves, your obvious dislike of anyone who can find value in them soured my opinion of what you had said previously to it.

Nov 17, 2011 1:37PM
avatar
You can already root the Fire.  Although, I don't believe there aren't any ROMS's available yet.  However, that is only a matter of time.  I mean the Cyanogen team released a working version of Android for the HP touchpad only 2 months after the HP firesale.  And that wasn't even running Android to begin with!  There will be custom ROM's for this by the end of the year that will make this as vanilla an Android experience as there is.

The point about fragmentation is moot.  Almost EVERY manufacturer that makes Android products overlays their own proprietary software on top.  HTC, Motorola, Samsung, everyone. 
Nov 17, 2011 11:47AM
avatar
@Midwestmoderate

Android based tablets have an implementation of Flash (now) 11 on them. The Stock browsers for each device, whether it be smartphone or tablet, inherently uses the flash implementation as though you were using a standard browser from their desktop computer. A lot of third party browsers do not have the ability to use the same flash implementation, but most major ones (chrome mobile which is the stock browser on android devices, firefox is now implementating flash, and I hear that dolphin HD will or already has an offering) do or will.

When it comes to the Kindle, as with all bastardized implementations of Android, which could mean non stock ROM implementations or Kindles restructuring or overlay if you will, of the android OS ... whether or not their modified platform will implement flash is entirely up to them and what they do / dont decide to include. If they left enough of the OS alone and left browsing capability at stock, then likely it would handle flash as any other Android device would. But I cannot speak from firsthand knowledge.

Nov 16, 2011 9:09PM
avatar
@ moneyhawk, The Ipad is nothing more than a glorified mp4/ video player. It can't handle MS Office or any actual work applications. So who is more of a moron, one who spends 200 dollars and more at Amazon, or one who spends 500 dollars and more at Apple?
Nov 17, 2011 11:51AM
avatar
Tablets and kindles are toys for coach potatoes.   Nothing like picking up a REAL book and turning a REAL page.    I laugh when they market that you can take more books on vacation,  wow if you need that many books maybe take a vacation in a library?

Apple products are designed to look cool and do one thing, make money for Apple.  If you are a PC power user like me, their products are annoying and you realize real fast that their products are designed for the computer illiterate.

I'll never give up on my laptop where there's a REAL keyboard and you can get work done fast.
Nov 16, 2011 10:55PM
avatar
Jon Garrett:
First off, I'm hardly a noob.  I've been using PC's since the first IBM PC was introduced with an 8086 processor.  How about you? 

Second.... what are you babbling about?  Apple fan boy?  I don't own any Apple products. 

If you want a Fire, go buy several and have a good time.  For my purposes, it's useless. 

Nov 16, 2011 10:59PM
avatar
Michael Coats:
I'm not sure how to answer your "moron" question.  I don't have plans to buy either the Fire or the iPad so I guess I never contemplated the moron issue. 

Nov 16, 2011 9:11PM
avatar
I don't like Laptops and doubtful about tablets. Until they can get the processing and video that my Desktop can play, I'll stick with a desktop for realworld and others for my shiny, (look I'm more important than you toy).
Nov 16, 2011 8:49PM
avatar
@moneyhawk

you're a noob, an apple fan boy and you dont know squat. the Fire runs Android and it's much more than a glorified reader and even if it was, people are choosing it over the iPad so that tells you a lot about how tired people are of iDevices which don't offer much.

Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

DATA PROVIDERS

Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.

Japanese stock price data provided by Nomura Research Institute Ltd.; quotes delayed 20 minutes. Canadian fund data provided by CANNEX Financial Exchanges Ltd.

STOCK SCOUTER

StockScouter rates stocks from 1 to 10, with 10 being the best, using a system of advanced mathematics to determine a stock's expected risk and return. Ratings are displayed on a bell curve, meaning there will be fewer ratings of 1 and 10 and far more of 4 through 7.

131
131 rated 1
262
262 rated 2
442
442 rated 3
602
602 rated 4
720
720 rated 5
585
585 rated 6
612
612 rated 7
456
456 rated 8
279
279 rated 9
124
124 rated 10
12345678910

Top Picks

SYMBOLNAMERATING
ABTAbbott Laboratories10
AIGAmerican International Group Inc10
ATVIActivision Blizzard Inc10
CACA Inc10
CSCOCisco Systems Inc10
More
Fidelity Brokerage Services, Member NYSE, SIPC. (c) 2011 FMR LLC. All rights reserved

VIDEO ON MSN MONEY

ABOUT

Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.

Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.

Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.