Amazon's new Kindle threatens Google
The most immediate impact of the Fire will be felt not by Apple, but by competitors such as Research In Motion, Motorola and HTC.
A recent study by Retrevo.com suggests that more people are interested in purchasing the Fire than Apple's (AAPL) tried-and-true iPad this holiday season. We believe this poses a bigger threat to tablets from Motorola (MMI), HTC and other carriers using Google's (GOOG) Android software.
About half of the developers surveyed by Appcelerator and IDC in North America said they considered the Kindle Fire their primary target, on par with interest for the iPad prior to its launch in April 2010. Pre-orders for Amazon's tablet have remained strong and the company may have recently increased its orders to more than 5 million units by the end of 2011. Amazon is shipping the Fire starting this week.
Early signs do indicate that the iPad's first true competitor may well have arrived on the scene. Lending more fuel to speculation that the tablet will suffer at the hands of its latest rival are rumors that Apple has asked suppliers to reduce shipments of supplies for its iPad and iPhone. Those rumors have weighed on the stock recently.
However, we maintain our price estimate of $502 for the Apple stock, which is about 30% above market price. Our estimate for Amazon of $233 is just under 10% ahead of the market price.

Kindle Fire more than just another Android tablet
The Kindle Fire has managed to captivate the consumer electronics industry with its $199 price point, significantly undercutting other tablets. The lower price point, coupled with Amazon's well-known brand and large media library, are poised to turn the Fire into the second hit tablet after the iPad.
There is no doubt that Amazon will shake up the market for tablets, possibly rendering the $500 tablet obsolete gradually. However, we feel that the most immediate impact will be felt not by Apple but by its competitors such as Research In Motion's Playbook and pricey Android rivals such as Motorola's Xoom and HTC's Flyer. Why spend $600 for an Android tablet from present Google partners if you can find most of what you need in a $199 Kindle Fire?
Apple's rivals in the tablet market are sizable but they haven't been able to significantly dent iPad's demand so far. However, most of these tablets, including Kindle Fire, run on Google's Android, which makes Google Apple's major competitor.
On the surface, Kindle Fire should be good news for Android as it runs on Android. The reality is that Kindle Fire is not a pure Android product. Amazon has taken some of the basic code of Android and built its own operating system on top of Android, thereby differentiating itself from the Android pack.

Fragmentation a key downside to Android
Fragmentation is the biggest enemy of any operating system. As time goes on and Google continues to develop Android in one direction while Amazon continues to take the Kindle Fire down its own unique path, the two platforms will be less and less alike, forcing developers to choose between Android and Kindle's OS. At some point in the future, Kindle Fire might pose a threat to other tablets running the very operating system it had once drawn its identity from.
Amazon is also not using Google Android Market. Appstore 2.0 from Amazon is fully integrated in Kindle and appears to be a much more user friendly implementation compared to Android Market from Google.
While Google and Android-based tablets face the biggest threat from Kindle Fire, Apple will eventually start to feel the effects of a lower-priced competitor. We do not see a 7-inch tablet providing an iPad-like user experience, but as tablets see mass adoption and the market matures to include customers who are far more price sensitive than the early-adopter crowd, Apple may well need to do a rethink on the iPad's price.
kindlemad (or anyone):
can't seem to get a good answer on this. does the kindle handle Flash?
That is my wife's bigest complaint about the ipad (we got it as a gift). A lot of the sites she likes have flash on it and this is frustrating on an ipad.
I know why Apple doesn't like Flash, but wonder how Kindle (or any Android based tablet) handles it.
Not sure from where these data is, but kindle's price is for a 7inch device and the dual core is not a high end one. Its a mere reader that is running on android. Unless its rooted, developers don't have a go to actually develop native apps for it.
I would wait for windows 8, its a better platform that will exist amongst most of the devices out there.
It goes to show exactly how effective Apple's marketing has been when you assume that the tablet market consists only of iPads. I agree with you that, to the largest extent an iPad may seem like it is either an oversized iPhone, or a toy of sorts, but this is simply an opinion with a first blush glance. Compound that with the elite of the GED's (Google Experience Devices) like Motorola's XOOM, which have an even larger capacity for the power user, and I would like to seriously hear from you, what it is you believe that you CAN do on your laptop, that you think you CANT do on a tablet.
Unless you're a developer for Windows based applications, (which to some extent is possible with a simple text editor; tablet has? Check) and need to compile on the fly or while traveling, then the reality of it is, anything you CAN do on your laptop, you CAN do on a tablet.
Couch potatoes? I know personally I'm an avid outdoorsman and use the built-in barometer, GPS, compass, and 4G while trekking through places like the cascades and apalachian's in my XOOM to keep my entire journey well focused AND for life safety. With a built-in barometer, places that start to approach treeline and the mountains creating their own weather make it very unreliable from typical online weather broadcasts and very APPEALING to have a mechanism by which to garner that on-the-spot weather as well as the other functions of trekking AND corporate VPN capability et al, all in one device. I strongly suggest you keep from pigeon-holing others by your own assessment of their leanings if you want credibility as a forum commenter though. While I respect your opinion of the devices themselves, your obvious dislike of anyone who can find value in them soured my opinion of what you had said previously to it.
The point about fragmentation is moot. Almost EVERY manufacturer that makes Android products overlays their own proprietary software on top. HTC, Motorola, Samsung, everyone.
Android based tablets have an implementation of Flash (now) 11 on them. The Stock browsers for each device, whether it be smartphone or tablet, inherently uses the flash implementation as though you were using a standard browser from their desktop computer. A lot of third party browsers do not have the ability to use the same flash implementation, but most major ones (chrome mobile which is the stock browser on android devices, firefox is now implementating flash, and I hear that dolphin HD will or already has an offering) do or will.
When it comes to the Kindle, as with all bastardized implementations of Android, which could mean non stock ROM implementations or Kindles restructuring or overlay if you will, of the android OS ... whether or not their modified platform will implement flash is entirely up to them and what they do / dont decide to include. If they left enough of the OS alone and left browsing capability at stock, then likely it would handle flash as any other Android device would. But I cannot speak from firsthand knowledge.
First off, I'm hardly a noob. I've been using PC's since the first IBM PC was introduced with an 8086 processor. How about you?
Second.... what are you babbling about? Apple fan boy? I don't own any Apple products.
If you want a Fire, go buy several and have a good time. For my purposes, it's useless.
MORE ON MSN MONEY
DATA PROVIDERS
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.
Japanese stock price data provided by Nomura Research Institute Ltd.; quotes delayed 20 minutes. Canadian fund data provided by CANNEX Financial Exchanges Ltd.
LATEST POSTS
Try as the bears might, they couldn't break US stocks. But investors still face frothy prices and considerable headwinds.
FIDELITY VIEWPOINTS
- How to sell covered calls - Fidelity Investments
- Savvy year-end tax moves to consider now - Fidelity Investments
- Seven ways to prepare for tax changes
- Five reasons an annual review is crucial - Fidelity Investments
- Take a look at mid caps now - Fidelity Investments
- State of the sector: Health care - Fidelity Investments
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
ABOUT
Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.
Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.
Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.


