22 years ago we were in a similar situation
The fiscal cliff is more like Kuwait than recent economic crises.
Which analogy works best for trading this fiscal cliff resolution, the debt ceiling debate last year, with the hideous declines that ended the moment a deal was at hand, or the European debt talks where we figured that each midweek European Central Bank meeting would bring better news and finally one did?
I think neither. As the president and the Speaker and their retinue start the talks Friday on resolving the crisis, I turn to 1990, specifically to 22 years ago right now, when then President Bush was asking Secretary of State James Baker to hold talks with Iraq about getting Saddam Hussein to pull his troops out of Kuwait.
Believe it or not, at the time we actually thought this could happen. We actually thought that you could sit down with Tariq Aziz, the Iraqi foreign minister, and hammer out some sort of deal.
We always figured it would have to be done in secret, and for some ridiculous reason we thought it would have to be done over the weekend. The shorts had been making a killing ever since Saddam had invaded Kuwait earlier that summer, with the Dow dropping to 2,350 from 2,900 as the stalemate went on. But they always feared the Aziz-Bush talks and didn't want to see that juicy 19% decline from the top be obliterated.
I was one of the shorts. I would dutifully bring in my shorts on Friday so I could sleep well over the weekend, knowing that I wouldn't have to wake up on Monday morning to a headline that says "Saddam Agrees to Pull Back, U.S. Will Rebuild Kuwait." At a certain level you had to believe he would do something rational like that. I mean, did he really think he could beat us in a war?
Fast forward 22 years. Today I believe we will see similar fears by people who are now in my shoes. You can hear their thoughts, same as mine back in 1990. "What happens if they do something rational? What happens if they find common ground? What happens if they start caring about all of the people who will be forced out of work immediately or who will have to pay much more in taxes?"
- Also see: 'Mad Money' recap: all is not lost
Those concerns could cause people to cover their shorts, betting that the consequences of going over the cliff are unthinkable, as unthinkable as what Saddam would face if he had to go to war with the United States.
Of course, it turns out that there never was a deal back then and we had to go to war and we won and that was it. The market was bottoming right then, 22 years ago, because the decline had compensated for the war already, but we didn't know that at the time. We just knew that whenever there was a resolution the market would be higher so why take any chances.
I think that we will be similarly hopeful that the two sides reach some deal and some shorts who have done so well during this 8% decline will feel like they don't want to lose that terrific gain.
But what if both sides were like Saddam, both believing in the principles of their own conviction to the point that everyone gets hurt?
That's what I worry about now.
Of course, it is possible that we are already where we were 22 years ago right now, bottoming as we await a violent resolution to the matter.
But what seems more likely to be the case is that we are at one of those Friday junctures before we hit bottom, perhaps the one at Dow 2,748 or Dow 2,616, or Dow 2,483, all covering levels that led to a false sense of hope along the way to the bottom at 2,360.
We actually don't know yet which level we are at vs, where we will be when this ends -- violently or peacefully -- but 1990 teaches us that you have to respect the hope that springs eternal, or at least on Fridays.
Jim Cramer is a co-founder of TheStreet and contributes daily market commentary to the financial news network's sites. Follow his trades for Action Alerts PLUS, which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust.
More from TheStreet.com
The fiscal cliff has already happened to my neighbor. He works as a machinist for a small potatoes defense contractor and got laid off because the company has no FIRM commitments for contracts in January
Did anybody attack BUSH RIGHT after 9/11 saying why was the damned BOZO asleep the wheel DESPITE the NUMEROUS warnings? Well they SHOULD have given the example of McCain and Graham. What a couple of ****ing hypocrites
If austerity will be a DISASTER for us, why is it not so with Europe? Obviously they are DOOMED because they already went over their cliff with no plans for economic growth whatsoever
MY strategy would be to just go over the damned cliff,and THEN come up with TWO separate NEW tax cut bills, one for the Upper Class and one for Everybody Else. Then vote and let the chips fall where they may for 2014. ANYONE who blocked the Middle Class from getting a tax cut would be toast
"But what if both sides were like Saddam, both believing in the principles of their own conviction to the point that everyone gets hurt?"
Each side would proclaim victory.
Shift those 401k assets into the stable value fund for the next three months.
He did indeed say that! Interesting who those who profited the most post-9/11 are the ones trying to commit us to anarchy now. Anybody besides me think we should be investigating a lot more than Patraeus to see who has betrayed us? Pretty sure bin Laden's prediction was best translated as: just be patient... the GOP can't keep this scam going forever.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Jeremy Siegel is still optimistic about stocks, saying the US economy is the best in the world. Still, he says, we're getting closer to fair values.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.
Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.
Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.