Microsoft's first loss is traders' gain

Excluding a massive write-down, the tech giant killed Wall Street estimates.

By InvestorPlace Jul 19, 2012 7:31PM

By Dan Burrows


You'd think the world was ending by the way commentators were screeching about Microsoft's (MSFT) second-quarter results. Yes, the software giant reported its first-ever loss late Thursday, but don't worry: Microsoft and that nice Mr. Gates won't be selling oranges by the highway.


When it comes to earnings, there are losses, and there are losses -- and Microsoft got slammed with the former, non-cash, silly-but-serious accounting of net income kind. The company swung to a quarterly net loss of $492 million, or 6 cents a share, compared with a year-earlier profit of $5.87 billion, or 69 cents a share.


Sounds ugly, except the market doesn't count like normal people do. Microsoft booked the net loss because back in 2007 it acquired online-advertising agency aQuantive for $6.3 billion.


Cut to 2012 and it turns out the accountants say that the aQuantive business is now worth, oh, maybe a hundred million bucks. Microsoft had to write off $6.2 billion in goodwill for the bad move, essentially admitting that it overpaid for aQuantive by almost the full amount it shelled out for the firm.


It was a boneheaded deal, no doubt. The write-off proves as much. But the only hit to the bottom line today is in the form of a non-cash charge. The money is long gone -- this is just the way of playing catch-up with the books.


And the market -- as dumb as it might turn out to be the long run -- doesn't care much about niceties like net income. Net income is for bores or long-term value investors or grannies like Warren Buffett.


No, the market -- right now, after-hours on a Thursday -- cares about things like operating earnings or earnings from continuing operations. Stuff that's throwing off cash now and will continue to pump out more this quarter and the next.


So after excluding that write-down and another half-billion-dollar item for deferred revenue, Microsoft didn't lose 6 cents a share. Nope, hallelujah, it earned 73 cents -- which clobbered Wall Street's forecast by 11 cents a share.


Because analysts typically ignore things like one-time, non-cash charges like the aQuantive goose egg. And the Street was able to model it in (and then some), since MSFT told everyone it'd be taking the big hit weeks ago.


Yes, it does make a flashy headline that Microsoft posted a loss. And, yes, net income does matter -- or at least it should matter a heck of a lot more.


But public companies are held accountable in three-month increments, and by that measure, Mr. Softee beat the Street by a wide margin in the latest quarter.


Operating income trumps net income every time, at least with traders. That's why shares rallied after-hours trading, despite the company's historic loss. (Microsoft owns and publishes Top Stocks, an MSN Money site.)


As of this writing, Dan Burrows did not hold a position in any of the aforementioned securities.


More from InvestorPlace

1Comment
Jul 20, 2012 1:02PM
avatar

You've got to be kidding me !  You don't think strategic losses are part of "silly but serious" accounting?  MicroSoft made a strategic purchase, paying billions for a company worth millions, and we should over look it ?  Two things happened, either they lost a lot of cash, or paid via stock and the stockholders lost a lot of value thru dilution. 

 

FYI - Extraordinary charges are a great way to judge the competent of upper management and the board.  If you see steady and large charges, stay away from the stock.  They usually have a way or reoccuring ever few years.

Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

DATA PROVIDERS

Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.

Japanese stock price data provided by Nomura Research Institute Ltd.; quotes delayed 20 minutes. Canadian fund data provided by CANNEX Financial Exchanges Ltd.

STOCK SCOUTER

StockScouter rates stocks from 1 to 10, with 10 being the best, using a system of advanced mathematics to determine a stock's expected risk and return. Ratings are displayed on a bell curve, meaning there will be fewer ratings of 1 and 10 and far more of 4 through 7.

137
137 rated 1
298
298 rated 2
469
469 rated 3
654
654 rated 4
591
591 rated 5
592
592 rated 6
690
690 rated 7
490
490 rated 8
318
318 rated 9
150
150 rated 10
12345678910

Top Picks

SYMBOLNAMERATING
NRGNRG Energy Inc9
STEIStewart Enterprises9
MRVLMarvell Technology Group Ltd8
ONNNON Semiconductor Corporation8
DHID.R Horton Inc8
More
Fidelity Brokerage Services, Member NYSE, SIPC. (c) 2011 FMR LLC. All rights reserved

VIDEO ON MSN MONEY

ABOUT

Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.

Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.

Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.