When the prosecution always rests

It is pathetic that the SEC doesn't have the gumption or the horsepower to pursue the Lehman case.

By Jim Cramer May 25, 2012 9:35AM

Can you believe the SEC worked for three years on a probe of Lehman Bros. and decided there was nothing there? No wrongdoing?


Is it really possible to hide all of that debt, lie about it consistently and not have that be illegal? Is it possible that the main thing Lehman did wrong was simply have the market go against it and we can't prosecute people for being stupid?


When I read this, it reminded me a lot of the guys at AIG (AIG), who also got away with blowing up the western world and didn't tell the truth about their positions or their leverage.


I like prosecutors. I love the U.S. attorney for the Southern District. That guy sees wrongdoing, and he figures out how to punish people.


The SEC sees wrongdoing and it shrugs.


Related Articles

Earlier in the week when we were talking about how Morgan Stanley (MS) claimed that it was doing business as usual -- informing the big clients on the buy side to be careful because numbers were coming down on Facebook (FB) and letting the big guys sell more on the deal -- I had to marvel how people quickly defended that by saying the law says it is OK.


I've got bad news for anyone who knows how to deal with the legal system. It isn't up to the professors or the people who work at these banks to say it is OK. It is up to the prosecution.


We've got a ton of laws on the books that could easily allow a civil case to be brought and some that could allow a criminal case to be brought.


But the prosecutor has to be zealous. Not overzealous but zealous and also enterprising. He or she has to start from a presumption that someone is peddling merchandise to one group on a caveat emptor basis but is telling the other group that you will need a warranty because the merchandise is damaged.


Imagine you go into a auto showroom for a BMW 750. You are a regular customer. You want to buy one. The salesperson tells you: "Listen, that car's not as good as you think. In fact, it might be a lemon. We're dumping them on people who aren't good clients and warning our good ones."


Imagine I have you on tape saying that to me.


Now next customer is some buffoon who believes that the 750 is a good car. He comes in and the dealer's salesperson says: "None better, top-rated. Probably have to pay a premium to sticker, and it is worth it."


It is entirely possible that someone from BMW is willing to say that's perfectly legal. It is entirely possible that it might actually be legal. But I bet an enterprising U.S. Justice Department lawyer might decide, "You know what, I think that stinks, I think they committed fraud, the statute gives me wide latitude, and I am going to go after them."


Do you think someone could stop that prosecutor? Do you want to stop him?


Sometimes it comes down to toughness versus laziness, inventiveness and risk taking versus the status quo and lack of resources.


Let me play with an open hand. I graduated from Harvard Law in 1984 and immediately passed the bar and became a lawyer before going on to Goldman Sachs. I mention it only because the people who are now running these Justice Department Districts or the people who are defending against these prosecutors all know how selective and how enterprising some prosecutors are than others.


Some would say: "OK, Dick Fuld and Angelo Mozillo have to be guilty of something. Let's get them." Others would say: "Wow, I wish we had a better case. We don't have a lot on them. Let's just give up, cause we don't have a smoking gun."


And they get away with it.


That's how it happens. You have to trust me, as an insider, that is how it happens.


No, I am not asking for a "Get Hoffa" squad like Bobby Kennedy set up in the Justice Department in the 1960s. But a major financial crimes unit like President George Bush created to nail the Enron people would certainly be desirable.


This president sets the tone. He needs to tell the Justice Department that it is unacceptable to allow these vast frauds to go unpunished. He's a lawyer, for heaven's sake, and believe me, he knows it is possible.


To me it is a travesty of justice that Justice didn't take up this banner, and it is pathetic that the SEC doesn't have the gumption or the horsepower to pursue the case.


Sometimes I wish I had just gone the way of the prosecution. I know right now I wouldn't sleep until the case is built. But with this SEC? The prosecution always rests.


Jim Cramer is a co-founder of TheStreet and contributes daily market commentary to the financial news network's sites. Follow his trades for Action Alerts PLUS,  which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust, and is long AIG.

Well, America is currently being sold to the highest bidder. Imagine what a free for all will occur if Romney wins, and the Republicans take the Senate!!! Wall Street will be dancing in the streets!!!
May 25, 2012 10:28AM
All government agencies are a pathetic farce in terms of executing their responsibilities in an efficient manner. It is the essence of their "mission statement" and will always be that way because the vast majority of citizens are too apathetic to do anything about it. 
May 25, 2012 12:43PM

I normally don't bash Mr. Cramer, but this line is a classic:


"You have to trust me as an insider, that is how it happens."


I'm not sure whether to laugh or cry.


Duh the SEC is in bed with these people they are paid off by the same people they are suppose to oversee.


You get some normal people in there and see how fast the mess will get cleaned up.

May 25, 2012 3:15PM
cramer is right...if the sec was doing its job he would be in jail
May 25, 2012 3:18PM
and it was no wrong doing when you told your idiot followers that lehman was safe?
May 25, 2012 4:12PM
Morgan Stanley fits right in to the Lehman category too. They are as crooked as a fart- that is aimed at the heels but still hits your nose!
 Nobody will miss Morgan Stanley when it is gone. At least EF Hutton had a great commercial even if the insiders were on the phone to the hedge funds before the meetings were even over!
May 25, 2012 2:06PM
May 25, 2012 11:46AM
The movie "Boiler Room" comes to mind.

May 25, 2012 3:17PM
believe me...if cramer was an insider like he wants you to think.......he wouldn't need to be selling newsletters
May 25, 2012 10:22AM
May 25, 2012 11:34AM
May 25, 2012 8:09PM
Cramer, go home and quit whining.  Morgan Stanley did nothing wrong - if there were enough idiots to buy at $100, they should have sold it there.  If you're buying anywhere north of about $5, you're totally speculating!  You think retail investors are going to research and trade this thing off fundamentals?  LOL.  $38 makes about as much sense as $50 or $100 or $25, so what's the difference?  Either way, the stock trades at a ridiculous multiple.  If people speculate, buy and lose money, too bad!!!  Now, if the Nasdaq couldn't confirm trades, thereby not allowing investors to know what they owned or didn't own, that's a different story.  But don't give me this BS about buyer's remorse.  If the stock went to $50, nobody would be complaining!  BTW, I bought some at the open at $43, and sold out at $38.25.  I speculated.  I lost money.  I've moved on.  I'm so tired of these whining losers - so typical of society these days.  When you lose, it's always someone else's fault.  SHUT UP!!!!!
May 29, 2012 7:53AM
I totally agree with you, Jim.  If it looks like a crime and smells like a crime and was perpetrated with criminal intent, it probably was a crime.  And I'm sure the American public sees it as a crime.  Now, how the heck can we get the SEC and Justice Department to get off their dead butts and follow the will of the people instead of just sitting around collecting their big salaries while doing as little real work as possible?
May 25, 2012 8:04PM
Your playing like your shocked very well ...you win the Pulitzer award....and the nominee for the best used car salesman goes to Cramer!
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?


Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.


StockScouter rates stocks from 1 to 10, with 10 being the best, using a system of advanced mathematics to determine a stock's expected risk and return. Ratings are displayed on a bell curve, meaning there will be fewer ratings of 1 and 10 and far more of 4 through 7.

125 rated 1
264 rated 2
485 rated 3
679 rated 4
640 rated 5
617 rated 6
632 rated 7
493 rated 8
276 rated 9
153 rated 10

Top Picks

TAT&T Inc9



Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.

Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.

Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.