How to be greedy when others are fearful

Good investors often load up on what others are avoiding.

By John Reese Jun 25, 2012 9:47AM

The nonstop headlines about the European debt crisis have led many investors to cash out a good chunk of their U.S. stock holdings over the past few months. From March through May, investors collectively pulled a net of about $44 billion from U.S. domestic equity mutual funds, according to the Investment Company Institute.

 

It's easy to understand why, with ever-increasing fears that Europe's woes would push an already slowing U.S. economy into recession. But if you want to beat the market over the long haul, doing what most investors are doing is a very bad recipe.


Whitney Tilson understands that very well. Tilson's hedge fund has produced exceptional long-term returns, and he's done it by sticking to a disciplined, value-focused approach and by not being swayed by the crowd. It should be no surprise then that as the market has headed lower -- and his own portfolio has taken a hit -- Tilson hasn't been heading for the door but instead has been adding to some of his favorite positions as they've fallen. 


In fact, asked in a recent CNBC interview when he cuts his losses on holdings that fall in the short term, Tilson responded: "We don't. If we still have conviction in the stocks we hold, we selectively add to them, and that's what we've been doing."

 

Many of the world's other most successful investors have practiced such an approach -- after all, if you like a stock at, say, $40 a share, shouldn't you like it even more at $30 a share? Provided that the stock's fundamentals remain similar, it simply means you're getting a better deal with bigger potential returns. Most investors, however, don't have the emotional fortitude to buy more of a stock that is tumbling lower. They sell falling shares at a loss and then miss out when the stock rebounds (which is what often happens if the stock is financially and fundamentally sound).

 

The most well-known advocate of such an approach is probably Warren Buffett. Buffett has famously said that investors should be greedy when others are fearful and fearful when others are greedy. He's even acknowledged that he will root for some of his holdings to fall in the short term so he can buy more of them.

 

In the dozen-plus years that I've been studying history's most successful investors, I've found that far more often than not they use an approach like Buffett's or Tilson's.


Most of my Guru Strategies, each of which is based on the approach of a different investing great, reflect this. Given the market's recent declines, I thought it would be a good time to look at some stocks in the U.S. and Canada that have been falling in price but that continue to get high marks from my models. Some of them have started to bounce back in the past week, but after the past few months, it still takes courage to jump into beaten-down stocks like these. Over the long run, you could reap great benefits from them, however.

 

The Mosaic Co. (MOS): Based in Minnesota, Mosaic is the world's leading producer and marketer of concentrated phosphate and potash, key nutrients involved in growing crops. The $21 billion market cap company's shares have fallen about 9.5% since April 1, while the S&P 500 has fallen about 6.6% (through June 21). But the model I base on the writings of Benjamin Graham -- the man known as the Father of Value Investing -- remains high on the stock. It likes Mosaic's 3.7 current ratio (a sign of good liquidity), strong balance sheet ($4.3 billion in net current assets vs. $1.0 billion long-term debt), and cheap shares (it trades for 11.8 times three-year average earnings).

 

Guess. (GES): Based in Los Angeles, this trendy clothing and accessories maker's shares have fallen about 9.5% since April 1. But its fundamentals remain strong. The strategy I base on the writings of mutual fund legend Peter Lynch considers it a "fast-grower" -- Lynch's favorite type of investment -- thanks to its impressive 39.3% long-term earnings per share growth rate. (I use an average of the three-, four-, and five-year earnings per share growth rates to determine a long-term rate.) Lynch famously used the price-to-earnings-to-growth ratio to find bargain-priced growth stocks, and when we divide Guess's 10.5 price-to-earnings ratio by its long-term growth rate, we get a PEG of just 0.27. That falls into this model's best-case category (below 0.5). 

 

Domtar Corp. (UFS): Based in Montreal, most of this company's business involves the paper and pulp industry, and it is the largest integrated marketer of uncoated freesheet paper in North America. It also owns a network of strategically located paper and printing supplies distribution facilities and makes incontinence care products marketed under the Attends brand name.


Domtar has been hit hard in the past few months, with its shares falling about 20%. But it gets high marks from my Kenneth Fisher-based model. In his 1984 classic Super Stocks. Fisher pioneered the use of the price-to-sales ratio (PSR) as a valuation metric, finding it to be a better indicator than the more popular price-to-earnings ratio. This model looks for cyclical and industrial-type firms to have PSRs below 0.8, and Domtar's is a solid 0.59. The model also likes the company's reasonable 32% debt-to-equity ratio, $17.16 in free cash per share, and three-year average net profit margins of 7.5%.

 

I'm long MOS, UFS, and GES.


John Reese is the founder and CEO of Validea Capital Management and Validea.com and the author of The Guru Investor: How to Beat the Market Using History's Best Investment Strategies.

Tags: GESMOSUFS
6Comments
Jun 25, 2012 11:56AM
avatar

I agree it's extremely difficult to buy stocks when everyday they seem on a downward trend. Good stocks with strong fundamentals PLUS a long record of paying a healthy dividend in my opinion is the way to go.

This is especially true when you consider the  current interest you receive on cd's, savings accounts, etc.

There are alot of great companies out there that are currently and have a long track record of paying a very nice dividend.

Jun 25, 2012 1:52PM
avatar
Very true for younger investors. I hear alot of people who demonize the idea of holding to grab those short term gains or avoid large losses. A great company shouldn't be judged by their daily movement, speculation or the latest headline.
Jun 25, 2012 2:58PM
avatar
Normally, I agree with this investment strategy, however, I do not believe we are in a "normal" investing cycle.  The "Great Recession" and the uncertain US and world economies may have very well changed the validity of this philosophy, especially for people within 10 years of retirement.  Many of these investors lost between 25% - over 50% of their portfolio values and they are still losing money!
Moreover, it's a travesty (joke) to call Ken Fisher an investing guru and to imply that he is in the same class as REAL investing gurus -- Philip Fisher, Benjamin Graham and Warren Buffett.
From early 2008 - mid 2012, I had over $600,000 invested with (Ken) Fisher Investments.  When I finally "cashed out" this month, the total value was only $509,000 -- a loss of over $91,000 + approx. $24,000 investment advisor fees paid, (total loss = $115,000)!
Furthermore, Fisher Investments manage the Purisima Total Return Fund (Purix) which has a 5 year return of minus (-) 4.18%.
  
Jun 25, 2012 2:34PM
avatar

We have something that I call GOVERNMENT RISK.

 

Obama is the master of the simple slogan used to control a mob mentality.  Hitler called it the BIG LIE.

 

Obama won his first election with the simple message,"change,"and the mob did not even ask change to what.  In the next election Obama will again chant a simple message, "Tax the Rich."  The democrats have made it a point to say that Romney pays little tax as most of his income comes from dividends.

 

I don't know what has happened to this country that I love.  In the next election Obama a total failure will attack Romney for being a success hoping that once again count on a mob mentality to win re-election..

 

I am close to retirement.  43 years is not my age but as I've used it for a while it is a few years less than I have been working.  I too am buying dividend stocks and plan on living on those dividends in retirement.  Obama now has 61% of the population on some form of government aid.  Obama has added 25% to the national debt.

 

PreOBAMAOMICS, treasuries paid 2% more than the rate of inflation,  You would create a tressury bond ladder have little risk and could live on Treasuriy divdends. The rate of inflation is quoted at 3% Treasuries should be paying 5% not less than 2%.  So I've taken on way more risk than I should.and bought dividend stocks. 

 

Should Obama get re-elected I doubt he will let all Bush tax cuts expire but he is drooling over dividend income. 

 

I find that I do agree with Obama's,"Change Song." He has failed in EVERYTHING HE HAS DONE AS PRESIDENT.  It is time for a CHANGE. 

 

  

Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

DATA PROVIDERS

Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.

STOCK SCOUTER

StockScouter rates stocks from 1 to 10, with 10 being the best, using a system of advanced mathematics to determine a stock's expected risk and return. Ratings are displayed on a bell curve, meaning there will be fewer ratings of 1 and 10 and far more of 4 through 7.

105
105 rated 1
271
271 rated 2
420
420 rated 3
633
633 rated 4
492
492 rated 5
532
532 rated 6
725
725 rated 7
515
515 rated 8
343
343 rated 9
140
140 rated 10
12345678910

Top Picks

SYMBOLNAMERATING
UPLULTRA PETROLEUM Corp10
EOGEOG RESOURCES Inc10
SWNSOUTHWESTERN ENERGY COMPANY10
TAT&T Inc9
COPCONOCOPHILLIPS9
More

VIDEO ON MSN MONEY

ABOUT

Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.

Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.

Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.