How to be greedy when others are fearful
Good investors often load up on what others are avoiding.
The nonstop headlines about the European debt crisis have led many investors to cash out a good chunk of their U.S. stock holdings over the past few months. From March through May, investors collectively pulled a net of about $44 billion from U.S. domestic equity mutual funds, according to the Investment Company Institute.
It's easy to understand why, with ever-increasing fears that Europe's woes would push an already slowing U.S. economy into recession. But if you want to beat the market over the long haul, doing what most investors are doing is a very bad recipe.
Whitney Tilson understands that very well. Tilson's hedge fund has produced exceptional long-term returns, and he's done it by sticking to a disciplined, value-focused approach and by not being swayed by the crowd. It should be no surprise then that as the market has headed lower -- and his own portfolio has taken a hit -- Tilson hasn't been heading for the door but instead has been adding to some of his favorite positions as they've fallen.
In fact, asked in a recent CNBC interview when he cuts his losses on holdings that fall in the short term, Tilson responded: "We don't. If we still have conviction in the stocks we hold, we selectively add to them, and that's what we've been doing."
Many of the world's other most successful investors have practiced such an approach -- after all, if you like a stock at, say, $40 a share, shouldn't you like it even more at $30 a share? Provided that the stock's fundamentals remain similar, it simply means you're getting a better deal with bigger potential returns. Most investors, however, don't have the emotional fortitude to buy more of a stock that is tumbling lower. They sell falling shares at a loss and then miss out when the stock rebounds (which is what often happens if the stock is financially and fundamentally sound).
The most well-known advocate of such an approach is probably Warren Buffett. Buffett has famously said that investors should be greedy when others are fearful and fearful when others are greedy. He's even acknowledged that he will root for some of his holdings to fall in the short term so he can buy more of them.
In the dozen-plus years that I've been studying history's most successful investors, I've found that far more often than not they use an approach like Buffett's or Tilson's.
Most of my Guru Strategies, each of which is based on the approach of a different investing great, reflect this. Given the market's recent declines, I thought it would be a good time to look at some stocks in the U.S. and Canada that have been falling in price but that continue to get high marks from my models. Some of them have started to bounce back in the past week, but after the past few months, it still takes courage to jump into beaten-down stocks like these. Over the long run, you could reap great benefits from them, however.
The Mosaic Co. (MOS): Based in Minnesota, Mosaic is the world's leading producer and marketer of concentrated phosphate and potash, key nutrients involved in growing crops. The $21 billion market cap company's shares have fallen about 9.5% since April 1, while the S&P 500 has fallen about 6.6% (through June 21). But the model I base on the writings of Benjamin Graham -- the man known as the Father of Value Investing -- remains high on the stock. It likes Mosaic's 3.7 current ratio (a sign of good liquidity), strong balance sheet ($4.3 billion in net current assets vs. $1.0 billion long-term debt), and cheap shares (it trades for 11.8 times three-year average earnings).
Guess. (GES): Based in Los Angeles, this trendy clothing and accessories maker's shares have fallen about 9.5% since April 1. But its fundamentals remain strong. The strategy I base on the writings of mutual fund legend Peter Lynch considers it a "fast-grower" -- Lynch's favorite type of investment -- thanks to its impressive 39.3% long-term earnings per share growth rate. (I use an average of the three-, four-, and five-year earnings per share growth rates to determine a long-term rate.) Lynch famously used the price-to-earnings-to-growth ratio to find bargain-priced growth stocks, and when we divide Guess's 10.5 price-to-earnings ratio by its long-term growth rate, we get a PEG of just 0.27. That falls into this model's best-case category (below 0.5).
Domtar Corp. (UFS): Based in Montreal, most of this company's business involves the paper and pulp industry, and it is the largest integrated marketer of uncoated freesheet paper in North America. It also owns a network of strategically located paper and printing supplies distribution facilities and makes incontinence care products marketed under the Attends brand name.
Domtar has been hit hard in the past few months, with its shares falling about 20%. But it gets high marks from my Kenneth Fisher-based model. In his 1984 classic Super Stocks. Fisher pioneered the use of the price-to-sales ratio (PSR) as a valuation metric, finding it to be a better indicator than the more popular price-to-earnings ratio. This model looks for cyclical and industrial-type firms to have PSRs below 0.8, and Domtar's is a solid 0.59. The model also likes the company's reasonable 32% debt-to-equity ratio, $17.16 in free cash per share, and three-year average net profit margins of 7.5%.
I'm long MOS, UFS, and GES.
John Reese is the founder and CEO of Validea Capital Management and Validea.com and the author of The Guru Investor: How to Beat the Market Using History's Best Investment Strategies.
I agree it's extremely difficult to buy stocks when everyday they seem on a downward trend. Good stocks with strong fundamentals PLUS a long record of paying a healthy dividend in my opinion is the way to go.
This is especially true when you consider the current interest you receive on cd's, savings accounts, etc.
There are alot of great companies out there that are currently and have a long track record of paying a very nice dividend.
We have something that I call GOVERNMENT RISK.
Obama is the master of the simple slogan used to control a mob mentality. Hitler called it the BIG LIE.
Obama won his first election with the simple message,"change,"and the mob did not even ask change to what. In the next election Obama will again chant a simple message, "Tax the Rich." The democrats have made it a point to say that Romney pays little tax as most of his income comes from dividends.
I don't know what has happened to this country that I love. In the next election Obama a total failure will attack Romney for being a success hoping that once again count on a mob mentality to win re-election..
I am close to retirement. 43 years is not my age but as I've used it for a while it is a few years less than I have been working. I too am buying dividend stocks and plan on living on those dividends in retirement. Obama now has 61% of the population on some form of government aid. Obama has added 25% to the national debt.
PreOBAMAOMICS, treasuries paid 2% more than the rate of inflation, You would create a tressury bond ladder have little risk and could live on Treasuriy divdends. The rate of inflation is quoted at 3% Treasuries should be paying 5% not less than 2%. So I've taken on way more risk than I should.and bought dividend stocks.
Should Obama get re-elected I doubt he will let all Bush tax cuts expire but he is drooling over dividend income.
I find that I do agree with Obama's,"Change Song." He has failed in EVERYTHING HE HAS DONE AS PRESIDENT. It is time for a CHANGE.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Traders might want to bite on BABA, but long-term investors have reasons to wait.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.
Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.
Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.