Trading volume is low, but who cares?

For retail investors, such sleepiness hardly affects anything.

By InvestorPlace Aug 23, 2012 3:23PM

Stock market crash © Kyu Oh/Photodisc/Getty ImagesBy Dan Burrows


Stocks are near a four-year high and yet trading volume, at least on the New York Stock Exchange, is at a five-year low.


Who cares?


Not mom-and-pop investors, that's for sure.


Low volume is largely symptomatic of under-invested portfolio managers who are wisely being cautious with their clients' money, and retail investors who've been slammed by two market crashes in a dozen years.


As for those mom-and-pop investors, low volume is inside baseball.


Trading volume on the NYSE hasn't been this low since September 2007 and it's quiet even for August, when vacations typically bring the doldrums. Volume is down about 30% against the five-year average for this month.


Sure, that's bad for Wall Street -- it means less revenue for exchanges like NYSE Euronext (NYX) and Nasdaq OMX Group (NDAQ). It's also not great for brokerages. From Morgan Stanley (MS) to Charles Schwab (SCHW) to E*Trade (ETFC), lower volume means fewer fees and commissions.


And, yes, low volume makes it harder to get a bead on what the market's doing and where it's headed -- a damn-near impossible task as it is. Technical analysis, for what it's worth, is based on both changes in prices and volume.


Besides, you don’t need to be a chart-watcher to know that any move on low volume is less meaningful (has "less conviction," in the words of the chartists) than a high-volume trend. We naturally have more faith in a big sample of traders and investors, as opposed to a small number of hedge funds and high-frequency traders looking to scalp one another for fractions of pennies.


But for retail investors, low volume doesn't much matter. There's still ample liquidity for the purposes of mom and pop. It's not like they can’t buy or sell General Electric (GE) or Bank of America (BAC) or Coca-Cola (KO) when they want, at prices they want.


And we may as well get used to it this way, because there’s little reason to think volume will come back anytime soon. Why should it? A great mass of investors is fed up with stocks and, well, they should be.


We had the dot-com crash of 2000, and 12 years later the Nasdaq is still 40% below its peak. Then, from 2007 to 2009, the S&P 500 fell more than 50% from peak to trough. Sure, it’s almost back to those 2007 levels -- five long years later -- but loads of folks didn’t stick around for the rebound.


The crash scared investors out of the market at the bottom or darn close. That wealth is gone. Money has been flowing out of domestic stock mutual funds -- the way most retail investors participate in the market -- and into bond funds and foreign funds for four straight years.


Investors have serious scars, ones which only get rubbed raw when things like the Flash Crash, the Facebook (FB) IPO fiasco and JPMorgan's (JPM) London Whale trading loss make the capital markets look like the Keystone Cops.


Furthermore, don’t forget that demographics are economics. The Baby Boomers, that cohort of nearly 80 million Americans born between 1946 and 1964, has been the pig in the economic python for decades, and they are rapidly approaching retirement.


The oldest boomers are turning 66 this year. If they're allocating their assets as they've been instructed -- that is, shifting more of their portfolios toward bonds and away from stocks as they get older -- then naturally that eases demand for equities.


If there's any cure for low volume, it will be lots of time, a much brighter economic outlook and a long period of rising stock prices. After all, there’s nothing like the allure of rising prices to get people hot for everything from tulip bulbs to houses to tech stocks.


Unfortunately, most money enters a bubble right before it bursts. If it takes another period of irrational exuberance to lift volume back to pre-crisis levels, we’re all better off with things staying sleepy.


As of this writing, Dan Burrows held no positions in the securities mentioned here.


More from InvestorPlace

8Comments
Aug 23, 2012 7:53PM
avatar
Are you refering mom and pop to smaller investors,i think that slang is rude and out of line,dis-respectful.So if your not a big outfit,like a huge retailer ,you get called names for be one who makes America,hu? 
Aug 23, 2012 7:22PM
avatar
Wow, the MSN board is alight this evening with investment companies trying to dump these dogs.  Time to short them.......see ya!
Aug 24, 2012 8:43AM
avatar

It sounds like the insiders are getting tired of playing with themselves. Volume is down because mom and pop have left the building and the dealers, traders, market makers, and insiders don’t have anyone left to fleece anymore. That’s the primary reason they big players are trading in the market to begin with. How else do the major banks and financial institutions come up with 100+ perfect trading days in a row? The probability of you or I doing that are about one in a trillion.

 

Without mom and pop to rob, these firms have no reason to be trading in the market either. That’s why volume is down. I bet they would love to have mom and pop jump back in. But, it’s going to take more than an article like this to get me to do it. 

Aug 24, 2012 12:06AM
avatar
If a young person puts their whole retirement deduction and matching funds into a bond fund they will NEVER have enough to beat inflation and retire on. Stocks are close to where they were before the Flash Crash of 2006 and are a bargain. Look how many billions Disney has re-invested back into the company for future growth in the form of more ships, bigger parks, better programming and the Marvel franchise. Only a fool would say we are better off stagnant than having investors get excited about the prospects of making money. Thumbs up for Obama and getting rid of the redneck, bible-totin' do-nothing Congress.
Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

DATA PROVIDERS

Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.

STOCK SCOUTER

StockScouter rates stocks from 1 to 10, with 10 being the best, using a system of advanced mathematics to determine a stock's expected risk and return. Ratings are displayed on a bell curve, meaning there will be fewer ratings of 1 and 10 and far more of 4 through 7.

129
129 rated 1
281
281 rated 2
444
444 rated 3
732
732 rated 4
629
629 rated 5
623
623 rated 6
610
610 rated 7
440
440 rated 8
303
303 rated 9
126
126 rated 10
12345678910

Top Picks

SYMBOLNAMERATING
BBBYBED BATH & BEYOND INC10
FOXATWENTY-FIRST CENTURY FOX Inc CLASS A10
TWXTIME WARNER Inc10
COPCONOCOPHILLIPS9
HDHOME DEPOT Inc9
More

VIDEO ON MSN MONEY

ABOUT

Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.

Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.

Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.