A horrifying new look for cigarettes

The FDA unveils its new packaging requirements. Will the disturbing images help smokers quit?

By Kim Peterson Nov 10, 2010 2:45PM
Credit: Courtesy of US Department of Health & Human ServicesCorpses. Screaming babies. Cancer victims. Cemetery headstones. Grieving relatives. Are these the best images for cigarette packages?

Yes, says the U.S. Food and Drug Association. The FDA is making huge changes to cigarette boxes, plastering gruesome warnings on half of the front and back of each pack.

The FDA is considering 36 label possibilities and has posted them here. The labels have large images on them, many of which are disturbing, frightening and sad -- and that's exactly what the FDA wants.Credit: Courtesy of US Department of Health & Human Services

A man lying in a coffin. A corpse with its chest sewn up. A crying baby in a hospital. A man clutching his chest in the middle of a heart attack.

The FDA plans to choose nine labels by June and will require cigarette companies to place them on packages and advertisements by September, The Los Angeles Times reports.

All in an attempt to cut the smoking rate below the 20% range it's been at for years. Tobacco use kills nearly 450,000 people in the U.S. annually. Post continues after video:
The FDA has hit the industry with other regulations as well. No more free samples. No more advertising in youth-oriented magazines. No more describing cigarettes as "light" and "mild," the Times reports.

These labels aren't sitting well with cigarette makers like Reynolds American (RAI) and Lorillard (LO), who have filed a lawsuit in federal court.

The companies say the new format makes their brands nearly impossible to see, since all logos are shoved to the bottom half of the packaging.

So will the new labels keep people from smoking? One smoker doesn't think so.

"I don't think they're going to be a deterrent at all for people who already smoke," one 27-year-old smoker told The Associated Press. "Most people start smoking when they're young, and I don't think they're going to think about the effects."

I am laughing so hard.....these labels will probably INCREASE the sale of cigarettes....people, especially young people, love "black" humor.
Nov 10, 2010 8:30PM

I watched my mother-in-law die a horrible death from the effects of smoking.


I believe the government is going about this all wrong. Printing out cartoon images to a reality distanced group of people 'just ain't gonna git er done'.


 I think a better deterrent might be for the government to pay the cigarette companies $5 per pack for each pack 'sold'. To 'buy' a pack, the purchaser must accumulate credits. These credits can only come from tending to people who are suffering from the effects of smoking. The health-care industry will receive some much needed assistance caring for people suffering from tobacco related diseases. When the smokers see the effects up close and personal and have to actually work to become like the people they're tending, I believe smoking won't be popular for very long.

Nov 10, 2010 5:18PM

Addiction don't mind no steekin' pictures.


And I think the 10-to-15-year-old set will probably try to collect the whole set of packages. Hell, I don't smoke and I probably will, if they're lurid enough!

Nov 10, 2010 4:58PM
I just don't understand. If the FDA is run by our government and they seem to want everyone to not smoke, then why the hell don't they make cigatettes illegal and shut down their production. All this jacking around with consumer is just ridiculous.
Nov 10, 2010 4:47PM
Why don't we just package cigarettes in black lung tissue and sell them for $200 a pack?
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?


Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.


StockScouter rates stocks from 1 to 10, with 10 being the best, using a system of advanced mathematics to determine a stock's expected risk and return. Ratings are displayed on a bell curve, meaning there will be fewer ratings of 1 and 10 and far more of 4 through 7.

124 rated 1
266 rated 2
452 rated 3
702 rated 4
671 rated 5
604 rated 6
640 rated 7
495 rated 8
267 rated 9
158 rated 10

Top Picks




Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.

Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.

Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.